Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by David Clayton

Utter bollocks

1 day ago 0 0 0 0

Well if you get really lucky Starmer will be out by Friday .....

3 days ago 0 0 0 0
Video

Magyar takes on a hostile press with style. Lessons for us in the UK here (and the US?), methinks.

6 days ago 28 16 1 0

I can’t hear anyone saying that - apart from anyone except Starmer and Reeves. They are trying to make the existing system work. Not sure it ever will but it’s more honest that the simplicities of Polanski and Farage. The Greens need to start being honest about their programme.

1 week ago 0 0 1 0

Agree - but once that is announced voters will think twice. It is the trap that the labour left have been in for decades. And that’s before we start taking the climate disaster seriously. Things need to change in years not decades …. Even months. And the will in voters is simply not there.

1 week ago 0 0 1 0

All true but even with that you still need to raise taxes. Only the Lib Dems have tried being honest about this woth hypothecated tax promises. Labour should have in 2024. Tax needs to go up and the thresholds need to rise. And they need to be open about it and stop all this populist ‘soak the rich’

1 week ago 1 0 1 0

And no party - including the greens is honest enough to say this. Polanski constantly hammers Labour for not spending but they have learned the electoral consequences of unfunded spending promises. … and they have aimed a lot lower

1 week ago 0 0 1 0
Advertisement

I agree with all these policies but the reality is general taxation to achieve this needs to rise. When social services were well funded income tax was 30% it is now 20. The reality is you can’t fund public services on 20% even if you do expand the economy- and greens are rightly suspicious of that

1 week ago 1 0 2 0

The Greens are not promising anything substantial at the moment - wisely. But the Green Party is highly democratic and policy is decided by the party and party conference not the leadership. As it stands they are committed to UBI, nationalisation, increased spending across social services and more.

1 week ago 2 0 1 0

And if that was the two choices you would be right. But the greens will need more than a wealth tax to raise the large sums needed for their programme. Nationalisation, social justice, UBI….

1 week ago 1 0 1 0

‘The masses’ might have ideas of their own :-)

1 week ago 0 0 1 0

…… haven’t flown anywhere in years and take all my holidays in UK, try again…. Oh and if you are arguing with people try find a better counter than calling them ‘delusional’. It rarely works.

1 week ago 0 0 2 0

Agreed - it’s shit. If it was that easy to deal with it would have been done a long time ago. I am in favour of everything the Greens are trying to achieve and who knows the electorate might just go for a radical programme of tax increases, increased spending, defence cuts a social justice.

1 week ago 0 0 1 0

It is tedious but it is about taxes and how they are spent. As soon as real decisions are made the Greens will rip themselves apart. And calling Labour Farage in a red rosette, red Tories and all the other tedious stuff won’t help. Green Party conference decides policy - but not how to pay for it.

1 week ago 0 0 3 0
Advertisement

Because they are light on policies and haven’t to do anything. Same position Labour were in before the election. A general election campaign promising tax increases will introduce the Greens to the dilemma Labour has faced for decades. Increase taxes, please the followers don’t get elected.

1 week ago 0 1 1 0
2 weeks ago 110 31 4 0

Phenomenal

1 month ago 1 0 0 0

Cruel but very accurate

1 month ago 1 0 0 0

Wow

1 month ago 1 0 1 0

More gossip.

1 month ago 0 1 0 0

It certainly is. The lack of access to law and lawyers makes it a tool for the wealthy.

1 month ago 0 0 1 0

So you literally said that some people shouldn’t get an experience lawyer because you don’t like them? I don’t like him but that is no reason Blair can’t argue his case

1 month ago 0 0 0 0
Advertisement

so people you don’t like shouldn’t have capable lawyers? Ok I get the argument…… so who are on the list not to be entitled to decent lawyers?

1 month ago 0 0 2 0

That’s a poor argument and I am surprised a lawyer would put it forward. Care to list the categories of people who are more/less entitled to a fair trial? Or is it everyone? Even if they are obnoxious and corrupt.

1 month ago 1 0 1 0

Great album - great band

1 month ago 1 0 2 0
Preview
UK energy prices are soaring – and propagandists want to sell you a false reason why | George Monbiot The war on Iran has put fossil-fuel prices centre stage, but don’t believe those who tout ‘maximising the North Sea’ as our salvation, says Guardian columnist George Monbiot

If it's sometimes hard to tell the difference between fossil-fuel lobbyists and the billionaire press, that's because there isn’t one.
My column on the politicians, journalists and junktanks using the Iran crisis as an excuse to extract our remaining gas and oil.
www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...

1 month ago 1063 442 40 26
Post image

This very straight news piece buried deep within the FT never uses words like corruption or insider dealing but every detail is quietly devastating. Why is the FT virtually alone in the UK media in covering this important story?

1 month ago 1740 877 70 48

The real world is so much trickier than the one journalists seem to inhabit.

1 month ago 11 1 1 0

And next week it’s something else. Or someone. This stuff is noise not news

1 month ago 4 0 0 0
Advertisement

It is. The lesson is not to fall out in public. By elections are rarely good for governments. The local elections will be a mess as well. They won’t matter in three years……
A divided and warring Labour Party will.

1 month ago 1 0 0 0