I get that people want what they want, but have some self awareness. All the increase in value isn't down to "hard work", so that line is the chef's kiss.
If it's work do you want to pay income tax on it? Capital gains?
Thought not.
Without bothering to ask how long the US was involved.
Someone forgot that the US wasn't in the First World War until 6th April 1917, so one year seven months and 5 days and wasn't in the Second World War until December 7th 1941 so three years eight months and 26 days.
If he's using this counting method it's 47 years or so, isn't it?
As you do, I checked out Gunner Arthur William Loney - he was 25, not 20, never served in 3rd Ypres so not "died at Passchendale" and then looking at the 32nd division TBM war diary found out he was accidently shot by one of this own comrades.
She does the research, doesn't she?
The one soldier she mentions by name? She gets the details completely wrong.
He was 25 not 20
32 division RFA weren't part of 3rd Ypres until October 1917
If only she's named Sapper Arthur Philip Oyns 50th Search Light Company, Royal Engineers, executed for murder 20/10/1917 also in Croyde.
Alternatively go and ask ChatGTP or whichever LLM you prefer, though fuck knows what answer you'll get from Grok.
The cotton gin, automation, was the largest boost to chattel slavery. Throw in the demand side from the mills and your whole satire is based on a piss poor understanding of the Industrial Revolution.
Automated cotton pickers didn't appear until the 1920's ffs. Learn some history.
Anthropic doing AI boosting is your go to?
And you believe them? Their whole business model is based on "this stuff is so dangerous only we should be doing it" which is the story they've been pushing forever.
"Be afraid, be very afraid"
share.google/5JVuHiv25h8S...
There were clear use cases for digitising the workplace and there were profitable companies by this stage in the cycle.
LLM's have been around 2018 and here we are 8 years later and can you point me to a profitable business model?
The civil war was over mechanising agriculture? Really?
Yes, because those who pointed out the issues with digital obsolescence have been proved to be totally wrong?
share.google/OLHhxhd5ETJB...
He was approved by Olly Robins - who had that statutory role.
I'm not aware that Starmer blamed the agency, do you have a link supporting that assertion?
I think the Cash/Berry case which was linked to the Tories was a larger lapse of security.
Profumo's was a lapse in judgment, not security.
He has a country to run, is he supposed to check everyone else's working?
Until we know precisely what he was told you're jumping to conclusions
Security vettings contain details that are quite private - unless there is a good reason you wouldn't necessarily want all the gory details
He was approved
If he was told that Mandelson had been approved how was he "lying"?
No, but maybe the first question should have been "can Trump and Netanyahu legally attack Iran?"
Missed opportunity IKEA, missed opportunity.
As much of an understanding of the powers of local government as that had of the European Commission it appears.
How will a vote on Essex county council "get Starmer out"?
Frank Furedi born 1947, that would make him a boomer.
Or are you going to insist that the boomer generation cannot be described as such?
Literally is.
Care to point to these specific regulations? The issue is, and always has been that the light truck market is protected by the chicken tax and so Detroit does everything to skew regulations like CAFE to favour those and the administrations play along.
The Chicken tax is Johnston era.
The article was blaming "the kids".
The comment was in line with that.
Sow the wind...
Mini bloat...
There's a place in the UK that has cars from the 1930's to 1990's that you can drive. There's a reason modern cars are the size and cost they are. Crumple zones, airbags, emissions regulations, etc.
Get in a 1980's econobox and you'll see why they have disappeared.
drivedadscar.com
Now why would you crop off the source?
Saudi where the majority of the 9-11 perpetrators came from suggests the US occupies a country where none of them did.
What is war for, if not profit?
Maybe I've got too used to Norwegian busses and exiting at the middle. 🤷🏻♂️
In line with the "things that never happen" of
‘The passengers on the bus say “Thank you very much”.’
The ULEZ cameras go flash, flash, flash...
Which is why they won't ratify UNCLOS?
Freedom for me but not for thee.
No he's extrapolating from that to assume that the issue is the cost of labor so the middle classes find certain things more expensive to obtain without showing data that is the case.
He's vibing that this must explain it without showing that it does.
Does the spending growth support the claim?
