You are still defending Depp

"I'm not defending Depp."

>Defends Depp

Have you read them in detail?

Gonna presume there was maybe a question of chain of custody for him (just based on experience) to avoid that on seen and they've been hopefully building an airtight case against him they can act on now

Sorry, I was a thousand miles away

Nick *does* give good sport

Eh, y'know what?

Allowing it

Is there a little asterisk next to that?

He just kept calling me trans.

I told him it was almost the worst argument he'd ever made, but at least our facebook spat hadn't left a client 6 figures in the hole

Says so much about those two I have to ask "which one?"

Ty Beard came for me on Facebook last year! Totally out of the blue, I had to double take when I saw who was posting

He was also caught with cocaine in his children!

Oh, *remarkably* so. Were I his lawyer I'd also advise him not to put on shades ans make videos boasting how clean he is while he's missing drug tests, buuuut...

With Nick, there isn't much a bottom. One of his buddies is Andrew Branca, a raving white nationalist psycho

It's better to fail the test. Almost every time. You go in, you own up, you say you need more help.

It's better than skipping out because now you look more dishonest

If anyone is capable of depleting that store of chances, it is Nick Rekieta

Nick Rekieta did indeed violate his probation.

Not sure he's been honest about that whole "I am one year sober" thing he was posting yesterday.

"Silly liberals, Trump's not a king!"

Trump: I have the authority to create a new Captivity of Avignon and appoint my own antipope should the Pontiff question me

Glad to share!

O Captain my Captain.

Awww, you're the best. Un momento

Hearing Nick Rekieta may have violated his probation.

There were allegations against him years ago that went nowhere. Absolutely horrific

Why do you think anyone's silence is indicative of his innocence?

You're gonna need more evidence than a "sneaky feeling" because the evidence to the contrary is a whole lot of resignations and a letter from remaining employees.

At a certain point, believing his innocence requires the belief in a conspiracy among his staff and multiple women who haven't met all telling similar stories.

Believing his guilt requires believing a powerful dude is a creep

You don't get out much, do you?

A lot of people never spoke up about Cosby, Weinstein or other prolific predators.

You also miss my point. Many of his staff likely know the victims and find them credible

Who can't? It's so good

I guess we're not getting forgivemogged for this

I also guarantee many of them know the accusers and find them very credible. He targeted staffers, the staff know those women aren’t liars