Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Herrick

Chuck Schumer likes to imagine how his politics play with an imaginary middle-class middle-aged couple on Long Island, but I don't think he realizes that couple is currently constructing a guillotine in their suburban backyard and stockpiling Molotov cocktails.

3 weeks ago 5376 1140 102 39

“Everywhere I went in New York people openly loathed the very sight of me. So naturally I concluded that the entire city had gone crazy and I left. There was no other possible explanation.”

1 month ago 8869 1200 333 52

If you're one of those guys saying "The Supreme Court just did Republicans a big favor!" you are obligated to explain (a) the world in which Trump just says "oh well" and doesn't try to do tariffs some other way; and (b) the world in which Republicans oppose him in those (or any) efforts.

2 months ago 94 9 9 0

If someone had told me ten years ago that in 2026, there could be evidence of the president raping and threatening to kill children, and he would *still* be allowed to stay in office, I would have politely asked them to put down the meth pipe.

2 months ago 22741 5987 804 268
There is no exception to the major questions doctrine for emergency
statutes. Nor does the fact that tariffs implicate foreign affairs render
the doctrine inapplicable. The Framers gave “Congress alone” the
power to impose tariffs during peacetime. Merritt v. Welsh, 104 U. S.
694, 700. And the foreign affairs implications of tariffs do not make it
any more likely that Congress would relinquish its tariff power
through vague language, or without careful limits.

There is no exception to the major questions doctrine for emergency statutes. Nor does the fact that tariffs implicate foreign affairs render the doctrine inapplicable. The Framers gave “Congress alone” the power to impose tariffs during peacetime. Merritt v. Welsh, 104 U. S. 694, 700. And the foreign affairs implications of tariffs do not make it any more likely that Congress would relinquish its tariff power through vague language, or without careful limits.

(a) IEEPA authorizes the President to “investigate, block during the
pendency of an investigation, regulate, direct and compel, nullify, void,
prevent or prohibit . . . importation or exportation.” §1702(a)(1)(B).
Absent from this lengthy list of specific powers is any mention of tariffs
or duties. Had Congress intended to convey the distinct and extraordinary power to impose tariffs, it would have done so expressly, as it
consistently has in other tariff statutes.
The power to “regulate . . . importation” does not fill that void. The
term “regulate,” as ordinarily used, means to “fix, establish, or control;
to adjust by rule, method, or established mode; to direct by rule or restriction; to subject to governing principles or laws.” Black’s Law Dictionary 1156. The facial breadth of this definition places in stark relief
what ”regulate” is not usually thought to include: taxation. Many statutes grant the Executive the power to “regulate.” Yet the Government
cannot identify any statute in which the power to regulate includes the
power to tax. The Court is therefore skeptical that in IEEPA—and
IEEPA alone—Congress hid a delegation of its birth-right power to tax
within the quotidian power to “regulate.”
While taxes may accomplish regulatory ends, it does not follow that
the power to regulate includes the power to tax as a means of regulation. Indeed, when Congress addresses both the power to regulate and
the power to tax, it does so separately and expressly. That it did not
do so here is strong evidence that “regulate” in IEEPA does not include
taxation.

(a) IEEPA authorizes the President to “investigate, block during the pendency of an investigation, regulate, direct and compel, nullify, void, prevent or prohibit . . . importation or exportation.” §1702(a)(1)(B). Absent from this lengthy list of specific powers is any mention of tariffs or duties. Had Congress intended to convey the distinct and extraordinary power to impose tariffs, it would have done so expressly, as it consistently has in other tariff statutes. The power to “regulate . . . importation” does not fill that void. The term “regulate,” as ordinarily used, means to “fix, establish, or control; to adjust by rule, method, or established mode; to direct by rule or restriction; to subject to governing principles or laws.” Black’s Law Dictionary 1156. The facial breadth of this definition places in stark relief what ”regulate” is not usually thought to include: taxation. Many statutes grant the Executive the power to “regulate.” Yet the Government cannot identify any statute in which the power to regulate includes the power to tax. The Court is therefore skeptical that in IEEPA—and IEEPA alone—Congress hid a delegation of its birth-right power to tax within the quotidian power to “regulate.” While taxes may accomplish regulatory ends, it does not follow that the power to regulate includes the power to tax as a means of regulation. Indeed, when Congress addresses both the power to regulate and the power to tax, it does so separately and expressly. That it did not do so here is strong evidence that “regulate” in IEEPA does not include taxation.

Supreme Court absolutely bodies Trump on IEEPA.

Just complete groin kicking.

They could have said that IEEPA lets him impose tariffs in an emergency but that this didn't qualify as one of those, or he failed to define one.

It didn't.

It ruled IEEPA doesn't let him impose tariffs at all.

2 months ago 1339 300 29 28
Post image

🚨🚨 Trump MURDERED an ICU nurse THEN called him a terrorist!

Alex Pretti saved lives for a living!!

Trump repaid this American citizen by pumping 10 BULLETS into him and is now lying about it

Anyone who supports this brutal lynching should be considered an accomplice and dealt with accordingly 🚨🚨

2 months ago 800 268 10 3
Post image

Same block. Gluten free heaven apparently

2 months ago 0 0 0 0
Advertisement
Post image

@craigcalcaterra.bsky.social I tried buddy.

2 months ago 1 0 3 0

My operating assumption is that he tried to do a hasty coup in 2020 that failed, and so everything he does in his second term should be understood as laying the groundwork for a second coup to succeed.

2 months ago 4477 1191 22 50

Deep cut

2 months ago 0 0 0 0

If the regime was even half savvy and/or cared about democracy in any way they'd serve up the ICE agents who murdered Alex Pretti on a platter for prosecution. They're not, though, because everyone is absolutely fucking high on their own supply and they're fully committed to authoritarianism.

2 months ago 213 35 10 0

The choice is impeachment and removal or calamity for the United States. I don't see how anybody watching Trump's speech in Davos can draw any other conclusion. He's a senile madman.

3 months ago 23491 6862 1037 379

Same Buddy. They can't get us all.

3 months ago 0 0 0 0

I hope this lying fuckhead rots in prison one day. And I view that as a worst-case scenario for me. I can totally imagine better outcomes from my perspective. bsky.app/profile/atru...

3 months ago 141 8 6 2
Video

I did a crisper version of this Andor remix if anyone is a completist.

3 months ago 175 66 7 13
Advertisement

Watching this coverage on the BBC and it’s wild to actually see people talking direct shit about Trump in ways you never ever see on US news. It’s like 5% as pointed as it should be but it’s more than you ever see at home.

3 months ago 117 21 3 1

What we’re being told is that a guy who is an adjudicated rapist, who was credibly accused of sexual assault by dozens of women, who paid hush money to a porn star, who cheated on all his wives, who is mentioned hundreds of times in the Epstein files, couldn’t possibly be a sexual predator.

3 months ago 14263 4505 548 245

Was worth it.

3 months ago 1 0 0 0

Oh shit. Closing tab, going home.

3 months ago 1 0 1 0

And to Tiny Tim, who did NOT die. He was unable to. He still walks among us, cursed to remember in a world where everyone has forgotten. He’s out there now, just beyond the light your lantern throws,

3 months ago 1515 296 31 12
Post image
4 months ago 1 0 0 0

There’s a lot of political commentary about Marjorie Taylor Greene resigning, but one important point is this: she entered Congress in 2021 with an estimated net worth of about $700,000, and is leaving in 2025 with a net worth of roughly $25 million.

4 months ago 224 124 10 6

Me, watching as children's motrin magically lowers Littler Girl's fever from 104.x down to 100.x, easing her very obvious discomfort and allowing her to get the sleep she desperately needs:

"I don't think this is doing anything and maybe it's dangerous. Probably better for her to burn up?"

5 months ago 1077 121 63 5
Video

Maria Bartiromo defends an immigration agent who was filmed brutalizing someone on camera in Evanston, saying they were "defensive strikes"

5 months ago 1093 366 223 63

This is the Trump/Johnson Epstein Shutdown

If Johnson swears-in Adelita Girjalva, the House will
override his scheme to block a vote demanding release of ALL the Epstein files

Clearly whatever is in the Epstein files about Trump & his pals is really, really, really bad!!

5 months ago 526 252 24 9
Advertisement
Video

NYPD Cop is sick and tired of TEMU cops AKA ICE GOONS racial profiling and harassing him.

5 months ago 6519 2821 359 199
Post image
5 months ago 97 13 5 0
Preview
Nobel Peace Prize 2025 The Nobel Peace Prize 2025 was awarded to Maria Corina Machado "for her tireless work promoting democratic rights for the people of Venezuela and for her struggle to achieve a just and peaceful transi...

This sounds like a direct shot at the whiny baby who has spent years demanding the Nobel Peace Prize just because Obama got one: www.nobelprize.org/prizes/peace...

6 months ago 7 1 0 0
Video

Vladdy: "DAAAAAA YANKEES LOSE!"

6 months ago 1611 494 15 213

Ortiz was absolutely loving this sitting between AROD and Jeter

6 months ago 1572 386 23 102