Putting strict limits on the definition of treason and significant requirements for its proof was one of the smartest things the Founders did.

Donald J. Trump @realDonald Trump Treason!!! President DJT

Well when you put it this way

Encouraging development in one of the Trump administration’s attacks on free speech. Proud that my Cato colleagues filed an amicus brief.

You know when you consider the alternative is fleeing to Hungary and getting paid to fluff an authoritarian dictator, reacting to your divorce by hitting on drunk secretaries at the bar at Applebees doesn’t seem so bad any more does it

"City prosecutor Marcus McDowell said it wasn’t a free speech case but argued 'no one has a Constitutional right to dress up as an erect penis and stand on the side of the road.'"

(For the record, the costume had, erm, somewhat deflated by the time of the arrest.)

Dude looks like he got locked in a shipping crate with three succubi and no water

Don’t skydive with that baby

Video: ‘Homophobic’ 6-Week-Old Baby Cries After Gay Dad Tells Him ‘There Is No Mama’

Maybe we'll keep some InfoWars content up.

The Shadow Docket Memos Are Damning. So Naturally, The Right Is Talking About The Leak. - Above the Law New York Times reporting reveals the birth of the modern emergency docket was sloppier, more ideologically driven, and less legally rigorous than anyone admitted. The right's response is to demand we ...

No, because as my colleague pointed out today, they are going to flood the zone with leak takes to crowd out any engagement with the substance

Looks like the prosecutors couldn’t make it stand up in court

That’s a good-looking batch. What did you use as a base?

This administration is more risky for women than Harvey Weinstein’s sauna.

There are a number of lawyers who are commentators on legal issues with a wide audience. When they pick up this story, circulate the Times article on social media, and discuss it, are they violating the Rules of Professional Conduct as well?

Concerning Harvard Law professors:

There’s a great new podcast out it’s just Alex Jones crying with periodic ads for DraftKings

People are going go hit each other and there’s going to be ‘splosions. I think I got this without reading the backstory guys. You’re not doing Henry VI Part II here.

You’re correct that it does not.

Are you sure it wasn’t two but you saw four

With the help of the Sandy Hook families, The Onion has reached a long-awaited deal to take over InfoWars.

We've enlisted the help of @timheidecker.bsky.social, who will be InfoWars' Creative Director.

Please stand by for more.

Free speech absolutism.

GOP lawyer Joe diGenova, now running Trump’s “Grand Conspiracy” probe, said Bondi had “nixed” him from the role

GOP lawyer Joe diGenova, now running Trump’s “Grand Conspiracy” probe, said earlier this month that Pam Bondi had “nixed” him from the role
www.mediamatters.org/fox-news/gop...

A Forbes article about a father who killed eight children, with an embedded prediction widget inviting people to speculate on whether "Congress will pass new gun safety legislation before 31st December 2026"

ghoulish

First, the Court takes a step back from its assessment of the particular categorical exclusions invoked and emphasizes the animating text of NEPA. The claim that the conversion of a commercial warehouse equipped with four toilets and two water fountains and designed for cargo storage into a detention center capable of housing over 500 people is the type of action that would not “normally . . . significantly affect the quality of the human environment” is, bluntly, absurd. See 42 U.S.C. § 4336e(1); see also ECF 15-1, at 16; ECF 15-13, at 4; ECF 34, at 10; ECF 15-4, at 66. As such, even before the Court examines the text of those exclusions, Defendants’

Friends, is it good when a judge tells you your argument is, "bluntly, absurd"?

Is it good when the judge says your proposal "raises a red flag"?

storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

/4 7. Mr. Patel does not brag he “vomited onto each branch of government plus the Post Office.” The Post Office is currently a part of the Executive Branch.

8. Mr. Patel has never sent a “dick pic” to Rep. Steny Hoyer while seeking actionable intelligence from an adult actress named Stacy.

/3 5. Mr. Patel did not ”squeal and wet himself” when told President Trump was calling. There was turbulence and he spilled his carafe of Scotch.

6. Mr. Patel’s children’s book does not have an explicit three-way scene.

/2 3. Director Patel passed agent pistol qualification and did not kill an instructor on the range. The instructor is doing really quite well considering.

4. Alexis Wilkins did NOT refer to her FBI jet encounter with Kash Patel as “30 Seconds Over Omaha”

Other false media statements identified in the Kash Patel complaint:

1. Special Agents do not, in fact, refer to him as “J. Edgar Shart”
2. Patel did, in fact, know that the FBI is part of the Executive Branch and that Wyoming is a state. He just always looks surprised when you tell him things.
/1

Justices to Hear Case on Catholic Preschools That Reject Children of Gay Parents

You wanna guess how this will go?

www.nytimes.com/2026/04/20/u...