Advertisement ยท 728 ร— 90

Posts by Sewer Liberal

People still think it's about 'deserving' or it being positive? It's just the person mentioned the most or being most relevant to the news

1 year ago 3 0 1 0

Weirdo

1 year ago 1 0 1 0

What exactly is bad about the article?

1 year ago 7 0 1 0

You clearly do not understand the concept of directly killing someone

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

The CEO also didn't kill anyone directly

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

Depends on how indirect you want to go. It's not like the CEO did shoot someone or killed in any other direct manner. If someone dies after drunk driving, you could argue the Barkeeper is at fault. What about all the CEOs that don't do enough about climate change? Who decides? You think a rando can.

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

Tbf they said 'or a night at home'

1 year ago 1 0 0 0

I am arguing your justification. 'outside of these parameters '.. your parameters are 'if can't go after person legally' that includes every person that didn't do any illegal stuff. So nearly everything is included in your 'parameters'. Just admit that its feelings based. There is no logic to it

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

How do you not understand what you are saying and what it turns into?

1 year ago 1 0 0 0
Advertisement

Read what you are saying. 'if the legal system doesn't offer a way, I don't blame anyone for doing what they felt was necessary'. the legal system doesn't offer a way to go after people if they didn't do anything illegal. So if they don't do illegal stuff, people can do what they feel is necessary.

1 year ago 0 0 2 0

There is either by legal means or political. Murdering CEOs won't help

1 year ago 1 0 0 0

If that were the case, that are normal tariffs that the EU also considers and US has in place already for some products. But that would mean Trump goes back on his promise.

1 year ago 0 0 0 0

Also you said in 99.9% of cases the legal system should decide, implying that in the 0.1% it 'should not' decide and that random people should. You said you were proud of NYC because of the murder. So you did say you want random people to murder people in 0.1% of cases. Don't weasel your way out now

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

But you can. What the CEO did was probably legal. Or did any court rule that well... It can't decide either way because there is no justice system for insurance ceo's? In western legal systems if it is not illegal, it is legal.

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

Themselves if the procedure or med's were important to the survival

1 year ago 2 0 1 0

You said 'But why should they not take any responsibility for causing their death? If the legal system won't do it I don't blame anyone for taking it into their own hands.' so for every insurance that didn't cover a bill and the patient died, the CEO can be murdered. And the people decide by ..

1 year ago 2 0 1 0

You say in 0.1 % of cases it is justified to kill someone if you think the law won't help you (in other words: you don't like what the law does in such a case). Did you not?

1 year ago 0 0 2 0

Don't do your silly "there is no justice system in the US, only for the reach". If you truly think there is no justice system in the US go on and proof it.

1 year ago 1 0 1 0

What country are we talking about? This happened in the US and last I checked the US does have a justice system. It literally is about not liking the existing justice system and than going to murder a person. That is what you are argueing. At least stand by it.

1 year ago 1 0 1 0
Advertisement

You don't blame anyone for doing vigilantism? You don't like how the justice system works -> go kill the person yourself. Great opinion, that wouldn't end in chaos :)

1 year ago 1 0 1 0

If you want to compete with those prices you can't produce in the US. How would Amazon get its products?

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

Please explain how this murder helps in this situation? Is this some kind of take a life bring back a life dark magic I am not aware of? I understand stealing to fund medical expenses but this?

1 year ago 4 0 1 0

It's the same jacket the lighting / color of the picture is just different. Compare the ground compared to the jacket. Also the same scarf.

1 year ago 2 0 0 0
Post image

Maybe bsky isn't any better than twitter.. regarding the suspect of the Brian Thompson murder #dgg

1 year ago 18 1 8 0
Preview
Trump Pardons Roger Stone, Paul Manafort And Charles Kushner The announcement comes as part of a wave of pardons and commutations in the final weeks of Trump's presidency.

He already did in his first turn. I see people claiming you can't vote for dem's in 2026 now are insane, if this is what the other side does: www.npr.org/2020/12/23/9...

1 year ago 0 0 0 0

I agreed with the mehdi hasan post. The fact that you think it's "hilarious" that I can agree with a person I don't align with 100% on everything tells me enough about you. It's hilarious you call other people 'propagandist' and call yourself a 'big bossoo' while acting like a 'little bitchoo'

1 year ago 0 0 0 1
Advertisement

Just using an emoji doesn't prove anything โœ…

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

The trip was not paid for and was all paid for by destiny and liner box themselves. The rest is obviously also false but go on spreading lies king ๐Ÿ‘‘

1 year ago 0 0 0 1
Post image

Sorry with bombarding you with questions about your statements but if I try to look them up, they just do not show in the data. Are there surveys that say that the majority of US voters wanted Harris to support Gaza more? After all Trump won and he is pro-israel www.pewresearch.org/2024/03/21/m...

1 year ago 3 0 1 0

She had 7 million less votes than Biden in 2020. 2,5 million less votes than Trump. 9 million more votes than Clinton in 2016 and 8.5 million more than Obama in 2014. What are those 15 million democratic votes number coming from? Not asking in bad faith but actually curious if I am missing any stats

1 year ago 1 0 0 0