29 minutes ago
0
0
0
0
Posts by
PrEP users (n=285, median 35 yrs) had high HBV (88.4%) & HPV (77.3%) coverage; low HAV (27.8%), MenB (37%), mpox (32%) uptake. Chemsex: 5%. Vaccines ↑ with PrEP. 💉
29 minutes ago
0
0
0
0
Advertisement
Azole Resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus From Diverse Environments in Ohio, United States, Is Primarily Driven by TR34/L98H and TR46/Y121F/T289A Environmental Signatures
AbstractAspergillus fumigatus is a leading global human fungal pathogen. Triazole antifungal drugs are used in clinical settings, while triazole demethylase inhibitor (DMI) fungicides are widely applied in the environment to combat plant fungal diseases. Environmental exposure to triazole fungicides may drive cross-resistance to clinical triazoles. To address limited data on environmental azole-resistant A fumigatus (ARAF) in the United States, we conducted surveillance across 75 sites in Ohio, including agricultural (57.3%), naturalized (25.3%), urban (16%), and commercial (1.3%) environments. Samples collected comprised air (n = 411), soil (n = 352), and compost (n = 42). Nested polymerase chain reaction of 397 airborne spore samples detected A fumigatus DNA in 62.7%, with 35.5% wild-type, 17.9% tandem repeat (TR), and 9.3% with mixed genotypes. TR genotype distribution did not differ by environment or DMI use. Aspergillus fumigatus was cultured from 18.1% of air samples, with 1.5% positive for ARAF. From soil and compost, A fumigatus was recovered from 41.4% of samples, of which 9.2% were positive for ARAF. Compost yielded higher A fumigatus (83.3%) and ARAF (21.4%) than soil (36.4% and 1.7%, respectively). ARAF prevalence was higher in urban (9.5%) than agricultural (2.8%) or naturalized (1.4%) environments. Generalized linear models suggested that compost and propiconazole exposure were significant predictors of ARAF occurrence. Among 72 ARAF isolates, 50% and 43% carried TR34/L98H and TR46/Y121F/T289A mutations, respectively, suggesting these mutations as key resistance signatures in Ohio environments. These findings identify compost and DMI exposure as a fertile milieu for ARAF development, highlight urban hotspots, and underscore the need for One Health approaches to resistance management.
🌍 Aspergillus fumigatus found in 62.7% air spores, 18.1% air cultures (1.5% resistant). Soil/compost: 41.4% fungi, 9.2% resistant; compost high at 83.3%/21.4%. Urban ARAF 9.5% > agri 2.8%. Compost & propiconazole predict ARAF; 50% TR34/L98H mutations.
23 hours ago
1
0
0
0
Proactive access strategies for novel cryptosporidiosis therapeutics
AbstractCryptosporidiosis is a major cause of parasitic diarrhea in lower income countries disproportionately affecting young children, malnourished populations, and people with compromised immunity. While still underemphasized on the global health agenda, the disease is gradually gaining momentum for therapeutic development. However, the real-world impact of any new medicine will hinge on its effective use in regions that currently face significant access barriers. This Perspective asks what it will take to achieve access to new cryptosporidiosis treatments and outlines strategies to bridge scientific progress with real-world delivery.
Cryptosporidiosis mainly hits young kids, malnourished, immunocompromised in low-income areas. New treatments need better access to impact 🌍💊📉.
23 hours ago
0
0
0
0
[Articles] Diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis host response 3-gene cartridge among tuberculosis household contacts in Mozambique, Tanzania, and Zimbabwe: a prospective, longitudinal, diagnostic and prognostic accuracy cohort study
MTB-HR did not meet the 2025 WHO target product profile criteria for screening or prognostic use; however, its positive predictive value for incident tuberculosis was higher than that of currently used tests. These findings support a potential role for MTB-HR in screening and prevention strategies.
MTB-HR ❌2025 WHO targets but has higher positive predictive value for TB vs current tests, suggesting use in screening & prevention. 🚫✅📈🔬🛡️
1 day ago
0
0
0
0
Advertisement
Effective Treatment using Bumped Kinase Inhibitor 1708 in a Calf Clinical Model of Cryptosporidiosis
AbstractCryptosporidium parvum, an apicomplexan parasite and the causative agent of cryptosporidiosis, contributes to a high burden in mortality and morbidity for humans and livestock. Currently, there are no reliably successful parasite-specific treatments for the debilitating diarrhea associated with the infection. Bumped kinase inhibitors (BKIs), which selectively target parasite calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs), have been shown to decrease infections caused by several medical and veterinary-relevant parasites, including Toxoplasma gondii, Plasmodium falciparum, and Cryptosporidium parvum. In the present study, various dosing regimens of BKI-1708 were evaluated for safety and clinical efficacy in the calf model for cryptosporidiosis, specifically with the aim of finding a minimum effective dose. The majority of the different BKI dosages produced notable improvements across nearly all clinical and parasitological measures, including diarrhea severity, oocyst shedding, and overall health status. These results provide strong evidence for advancing BKI-1708 as a preclinical candidate for treatment of cryptosporidiosis.
Cryptosporidium parvum causes severe diarrhea; no specific treatments exist. BKI-1708 reduced symptoms and oocyst shedding in calves, showing promise as a treatment.🦠🐄💊
1 day ago
0
0
0
0
Cryptosporidium parvum outbreak among volunteers of a licensed wildlife rehabilitation center housing raccoons—2024
AbstractZoonotic transmission of Cryptosporidium parvum (C. parvum) is often associated with ruminants. We report an investigation of cryptosporidiosis among persons who had contact with raccoons. In July 2024, two states identified 18 human cryptosporidiosis cases who volunteered at the same animal facility. One human specimen and two raccoon specimens tested positive for C. parvum. Molecular subtyping of the C. parvum (subtype IIaA15G2R1) suggested zoonotic transmission between raccoons, humans, or their shared environments. These findings can inform public health actions, developed in collaboration with specific populations (e.g., wildlife rehabilitation facilities) and include interventions tailored to such settings to mitigate future outbreaks.
🦠18 cryptosporidiosis cases in 2 states linked to raccoon contact. C. parvum subtype IIaA15G2R1 found in 1 human & 2 raccoons, suggesting zoonotic spread.
2 days ago
0
0
0
0
Maternal cytomegalovirus serology results by geographic region in a large multicenter United States study
AbstractCongenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, due to both nonprimary and primary maternal infection, affects nearly 1% of neonates. In conducting a randomized trial of hyperimmune globulin for prevention of congenital CMV infection, we screened over 200,000 pregnancies across the United States for evidence of prior or primary CMV infection and evaluated their geographic variation. Although the majority were seropositive, seroprevalence and primary infection risk varied significantly by geographic region, with seroprevalence the highest (88%) and primary infection (0.2%) the lowest in the Southwest. This variation in seroprevalence by geography may inform planning of public health measures to decrease congenital CMV.
CMV👶 affects ~1% neonates. Screening 200k+ US pregnancies found 88% seropositive in Southwest, with lowest 0.2% primary infection. Geography impacts CMV risk.🌍
2 days ago
0
0
0
0
Bacterial dysbiosis, cervicovaginal human papillomaviruses and inflammation persist in women living with HIV-1 after a year of antiretroviral treatment
The cervicovaginal microbiome may affect HIV-1 susceptibility and can in turn influence the prevalence and clinical course of HIV-1 and other sexually transmitted diseases. As the determinants, immunological correlates and clinical effects of the dysbiosis observed in women living with HIV-1 (WWH) remain elusive, we evaluated the vaginal immunologic milieu, cervicovaginal microbiome and prevalence of human papillomaviruses (HPV) in antiretroviral-naïve WWH over their first year of antiretroviral therapy (ART).Methods83 ART-naïve Ugandan WWH were enrolled in a longitudinal observational trial. Clinical evaluation and sampling of cervicovaginal secretions and plasma were performed at 0, 8, 24 and 52 weeks post-ART initiation. Amplification of the 16S-rRNA gene V3–V4 region was used to determine the cervicovaginal microbiome. A multiplex bead-array assay was used to quantify the concentration of biomarkers while a PCR-based hybridization assay was utilized for HPV detection and genotyping.ResultsGardnerella was the most abundant genus with a median relative abundance of 35% before ART maintaining a high prevalence throughout the study. Vaginal bacterial diversity did not change after ART, although the relative abundance of some genera, including the bacterial-vaginosis-associated bacteria Peptostreptococcus and Prevotella, decreased compared to baseline. Inflammatory biomarkers remained elevated in the cervicovaginal compartment despite prompt decreases in plasma.The prevalence of high and low-risk HPV types remained stable despite ART.ConclusionsSuppression of HIV-1 replication is not sufficient to revert dysbiotic changes, proinflammatory immunological milieu and persistent HPV infections. Exploration of targeted strategies to restore cervicovaginal mucosal immunological functions in WWH is warranted.
ART in 83 Ugandan WWH didn't reduce Gardnerella (35%) or vaginal diversity. Inflammation stayed high; HPV types stable. HIV suppression ≠ microbiome or HPV restoration.🦠🔥 #HIV
3 days ago
1
0
0
0
Advertisement
A Multinational Trial of Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Is FASTer Better?
Selecting the right antibiotic to treat an infection is the cornerstone of effective antibacterial therapy and lifesaving in severe infections.1 The growing epidemic of antimicrobial resistance is making decisions about empiric treatment increasingly difficult and elevating the importance of having pathogen susceptibility data.2 Unfortunately, the time to get this vital information remains agonizingly long. In most microbiology laboratories, organisms must be grown and then tested after isolation from blood culture samples, a process that usually takes more than 24 hours. While awaiting this crucial information, clinicians are faced with a difficult dilemma: choose potentially excessively broad-spectrum antibiotics and risk potentially preventable adverse events or risk ineffective therapy. In nearly all cases, clinicians will choose the former, helping fuel the downward spiral of antimicrobial resistance because broad-spectrum antibiotics increase the selective pressure for resistant organisms, which, in turn, require even broader-spectrum antibiotics.
Faster results on antibiotic susceptibility could provide at least a partial off-ramp. Knowing the right antibiotic in hours, rather than days, would allow clinicians to optimize therapy earlier in the treatment course, perhaps in time to change outcomes for the better. Fortunately, the technology to make this possible is not science fiction. Rapid susceptibility testing systems are commercially available and have been associated with lower lengths of stay and even mortality reductions in some studies.3 However, that literature has been challenging to interpret. The evidence for shorter length of stay and mortality benefits has come mostly from observational studies. Prospective trials have shown benefits in decreased time to optimal therapy, but not mortality or length of stay, although all have been conducted in settings with low rates of antibiotic resistance.
Against this backdrop, we now have the results of the Fast Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for Gram-Negative Bacteremia Trial (FAST) published in this issue of JAMA.3 In a multinational randomized clinical trial, Banerjee and colleagues evaluated whether rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) performed directly from positive blood culture bottles improves clinical outcomes for gram-negative bacteremia compared with standard AST methods. The FAST trial included 850 hospitalized adults and children across 7 centers in Greece, India, Israel, and Spain. Cephalosporin or carbapenem resistance was detected in 44% of patients overall.
Participants were randomized to undergo either rapid AST using the VITEK REVEAL system plus standard AST or standard AST alone. All patients were evaluated by local antimicrobial stewardship programs, which issued treatment recommendations based on initial Gram stain results, organism identification, and susceptibility findings. The trial’s primary end point—the desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) at day 30—integrated mortality, clinical response, discharge outcomes, and deleterious events, such as kidney failure or acquisition of multidrug-resistant organisms. The DOOR methodology has been used in many of the trials run by the National Institutes of Health–funded Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group, and its strengths and limitations have been described elsewhere.4 The authors also examined several secondary outcomes and explored outcomes in the subsets of patients with cephalosporin- and carbapenem-resistant infections.
Rapid AST did not achieve superiority over standard AST. The probability that a patient in the rapid testing group would have a more desirable DOOR outcome than a patient in the standard group was 48.8% (95% CI, 45.3%-52.4%), narrowly failing to exceed the prespecified 50% threshold for superiority. However, rapid AST was associated with important benefits in duration of hospitalization. Although overall length of stay was similar between the rapid and standard AST groups, the percentage of patients who remained hospitalized at 30 days post enrollment was 4% lower in the rapid than standard AST group and this difference increased to 13% among patients with carbapenem-resistant infections. Likewise, the median number of days hospitalized after enrollment was 3 days shorter in patients with cephalosporin-resistant infections.
There were also important process of care benefits in the group randomized to undergo rapid AST. Patients undergoing rapid AST had significantly shorter time to first antibiotic modification, with a median of 22 hours compared with 36 hours in the standard group. This advantage was magnified among patients with cephalosporin- or carbapenem-resistant infections, where antibiotic changes were made 23 and 29 hours faster, respectively. Additionally, and perhaps most important, in patients receiving undertreatment, rapid AST led to antibiotic escalation a full 24 hours earlier than standard AST.
The FAST trial presents the same interpretation conundrum as some of the other trials of rapid AST: if patients were given proper therapy faster, why were there not clearer benefits related to mortality and length of stay? This could partly be a sample size challenge. One would expect to see a mortality benefit from rapid AST primarily in the subset of patients who had severe infections, such as sepsis, who were also receiving ineffective empiric therapy. Despite the size of the FAST trial, only approximately one-quarter of patients had septic shock. Additionally, despite the high rates of resistance, more than 60% of patients were already receiving effective antibiotics when they were enrolled. It is likely that the subset of patients with septic shock and receiving ineffective therapy enrolled in the FAST trial was too small to assess outcome differences between rapid and standard AST. Attempting to conduct a study that enrolled only patients with septic shock and receiving ineffective empiric therapy would require an enrollment size that is likely well beyond what could be realistically supported with current research resources. The authors also point out that in some cases, the optimal antibiotic was not available because of various access issues, such as a national shortage of aztreonam in Greece during the study. Rapid AST would obviously have had no benefit in cases where the agent identified by the test was not available to the patient. Issues with access to effective antibiotics, especially newer agents, remain an important challenge in resource-limited settings.5
Unlike previous rapid AST trials, the FAST study did show some important benefits in duration of hospitalization, especially among patients with resistant infections. It appears that the length of stay benefits occurred primarily in patients with long durations of hospitalization; for example, patients still hospitalized 30 days after enrollment. Considering this finding, it was interesting to see the major difference in antibiotic deescalation. Among patients receiving unnecessarily broad-spectrum antibiotics, the median time to deescalation was faster in the rapid testing group because less than 50% of patients in the standard group underwent any deescalation. Studies have shown important benefits to deescalation that can reduce the risk of prolonged hospitalization, including reduced risks of acute kidney injury6 and development of antibiotic resistance.7
Banerjee and colleagues should be commended for undertaking this challenging study, which was not only evaluating a rare outcome, but also posed substantial implementation challenges regarding workflow. It would have been interesting to see details on the cost differences between rapid and standard AST, but these might not have been available because the technology was implemented as part of a trial. In US hospitals, the added costs of adopting rapid AST could be at least partially offset by New Technology Add-On Payments from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, for which the system studied in the FAST trial does appear to qualify.8 Additionally, as with most new technologies, it is likely that the price will drop over time.
The FAST trial should move hospitals firmly in the direction of implementing rapid AST. Certainly, the benefits are likely to be greater in patients with resistant-organism infections and septic shock. However, the former is never known at the time of presentation and the latter can easily develop after blood cultures are obtained and before results are known. Therefore, trying to focus rapid AST on a subset of patients where it might have clear mortality benefit seems impractical and unnecessary. Nearly every hospital in the US, and many globally (including all the hospitals in the FAST trial), have antibiotic stewardship programs focused on ensuring that patients receive optimal antibiotic therapy.9 If we have a tool that will help antibiotic stewardship programs support clinicians in optimizing therapy faster, an outcome that is consistent across all studies of rapid AST, should we not work toward making that tool available? The answer from a patient-centric perspective is clearly yes.
Back to top
Article Information
Corresponding Author: Arjun Srinivasan, MD, Joint Commission, 1 Renaissance Blvd, Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181 (asrinivasan@jointcommission.org).Published Online: April 18, 2026. doi:10.1001/jama.2026.5504Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
References
1.Leung
LY, Huang
HL, Hung
KK,
et al. Door-to-antibiotic time and mortality in patients with sepsis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Intern Med. 2024;129:48-61. doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2024.06.015PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref2.Kumar
NR, Balraj
TA, Kempegowda
SN, Prashant
A. Multidrug-resistant sepsis: a critical healthcare challenge. Antibiotics (Basel). 2024;13(1):46. doi:10.3390/antibiotics13010046PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref3.Banerjee
R, Komarow
L, Li
Y,
et al; Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group. Fast antimicrobial susceptibility testing for gram-negative bacteremia: the FAST randomized clinical trial. JAMA. Published online April 18, 2026. doi:10.1001/jama.2026.5487ArticleGoogle Scholar4.Ong
SWX, Petersiel
N, Loewenthal
MR, Daneman
N, Tong
SYC, Davis
JS. Unlocking the DOOR—how to design, apply, analyse, and interpret desirability of outcome ranking endpoints in infectious diseases clinical trials. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2023;29:1024-1030. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2023.05.003PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref5.Patel
TS, Sati
H, Lessa
FC,
et al. Defining access without excess: expanding appropriate use of antibiotics targeting multidrug-resistant organisms. Lancet Microbe. 2024;5(1):e93-e98. doi:10.1016/S2666-5247(23)00256-2PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref6.Kam
KQ, Chen
T, Kadri
SS,
et al. Epidemiology and outcomes of antibiotic de-escalation in patients with suspected sepsis in US hospitals. Clin Infect Dis. 2025;80(1):108-117. doi:10.1093/cid/ciae591PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref7.Teshome
BF, Park
T, Arackal
J, Hampton
N, Kollef
MH, Micek
ST. Preventing new gram-negative resistance through beta-lactam de-escalation in hospitalized patients with sepsis: a retrospective cohort study. Clin Infect Dis. 2024;79(4):826-833. doi:10.1093/cid/ciae253PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref8.Department of Health and Human Services. Medicare program; hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems for acute care hospitals (IPPS) and the Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System and policy changes and fiscal year (FY) 2026 rates; changes to the FY 2025 IPPS rates due to court decision; requirements for quality programs; and other policy changes; health data, technology, and interoperability: electronic prescribing, real-time prescription benefit and electronic prior authorization. August 4, 2025. Accessed March 23, 2026. https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2025-14681.pdf 9.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Hospital antibiotic stewardship. Accessed March 23, 2026. https://arpsp.cdc.gov/profile/stewardship
FAST trial with 850 pts found rapid AST ∅ ↑mortality but shortened hospital stay by 3 days in resistant infections & cut antibiotic changes time from 36h to 22h ⏳🦠 #AntibioticStewardship
3 days ago
2
0
0
0