Screenshot of https://www.complexdatalab.com/stamina/ web page
Lab knowledge base on Semble spotted in the wild ๐
@stamina-workgroup.bsky.social
Screenshot of https://www.complexdatalab.com/stamina/ web page
Lab knowledge base on Semble spotted in the wild ๐
@stamina-workgroup.bsky.social
Open-mindedness was the strongest predictor of *rejecting* conspiracy theories in a sample of 46,745 participants in 68 nations
In particular, participants who were threatened by people who disagree with them were the most likely to believe conspiracy theories.
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
We are very much looking forward to it!
I'm not an expert here, but my impression is that degrowth did provide a tent in which to do meaningful analyses to debunk a neoliberal end-of-history. It just never got much power to do things. Maybe decomputing could play out differently. more precarity could mean more appetite for change? I dunno
Very fashy interior design. I guess it's a good thing that it seems out of place enough to me to come off as part of the alternative timeline segment of some sci-fi show.
you can see in a near future of even more precarious living with AI labeled as the cause, how "decomputing" as a reactionary humanist/luddite movement to technologies of control (but really just overall malaise) could capture minds as much or more than degrowth ever did. Will it be productive? ๐คทโโ๏ธ
โAs Khem Rogaly argues, defence spending provides a weak economic stimulus compared with public investment โ and is even worse as a job creator.โ
Khem Rogaly quoted in @theguardian.com โs editorial on military spending ๐
www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
Why interrogate bias as social (e.g. in dilemmas), when bias is already there for LLMs sampling from simple discrete and continuous distributions, and even just the notion of LLM producing calibrated responses has issues e.g. a paper from only a few days ago: arxiv.org/pdf/2604.065...?
What moral framework would you argue from to defend your claim that uniform selection here is considered the fair rule?
๐จJoin us for our next www.complexdatalab.com/stamina/ talk @ 11am ET tmr!
@zhijingjin.bsky.social will talk all about LLM cooperation!
Standard social annotation apps include mainly tagging, bookmarking or highlighting - super excited to expand the sensemaking toolbox with Connections!
Let's make the semantic web great again ;)
*capability, not capacity
The concern precedes the press release. e.g. longtime security egghead & recent Anthropic employee Carlini visibly shaken by the rate of increase in capacity for finding deep vulnerabilities and saying the next 2 months is a crucial window to do something www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sd2...
Feels so wrong that price I pay at the pump will respond to how effective the bombing campaign is.
"AI is an incredible force multiplier for implementation, but itโs a dangerous substitute for design"
When and how can test-time thinking allow models to use information latent in their training data? What are the benefits and tradeoffs relative to other solutions like synthetic data augmentation? Pleased to share (after a long delay) an exploration of these issues: arxiv.org/abs/2604.01430 thread:
I like how Anthropic is just obliquely releasing their work on recursive self-improvement.
Trump's hackin' the mainframe with vibe-coded press conferences, lol.
Just realized Trump is quite literally "working the stock market" insofar as he is operating a kind of information engine that extracts work ($) from Trump-announcement-based market "corrections".
I feel like the development wave in AI agents now to have very liberal memory access is going to blowup in their faces. There will be a course correct that introduces a more conservative standard that is much more cautious about how correlations are managed across sessions/context.
This wild paper showed that GPT-3 (whose cutoff is pre-pandemic) seems to encode the kind of social pola
rization we observed in the pandemic, suggesting the potential for polarization was baked into the culture filter through its weights. arxiv.org/abs/2407.11190
Strange loop. Like a liar's paradox, but in the mind of the liar.
freely available after the conference I presume. Let us know :)
Can I read about Lea?
@spacecowboy17.bsky.social is there a clear culprit here in the For You knob set?
Another โatproto magic momentโ (tm): @semble.so bookmarks alongside @margin.at highlights. Oh and hey thatโs the @co.cameron.stream bot over there making annotations. Easy to take this stuff for granted like it always existed but itโs crazy cool and kinda mind blowing when you zoom out a little
It's in 5 billion, not 500 million, no? 10x more. Somewhat less pressing.
We need menswear guy to comment on the outfit.
great paper to point to now when referencing this top-down influence. I think finding out how to tease its effects apart from those of the bottom-up agent planning influence will lead to real advances in understanding and modelling social systems.
New paper: โ๐ ๐๐ก๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฒ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐ฉ๐ซ๐ข๐๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐๐ก๐๐ญ ๐๐๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐ญ๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐ฌ ๐จ๐ ๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒโ
Agent-based models of social order work better when agents act by predictive pattern completion from prefix (culture/context) to suffix (action) than when they act through expected value maximization