ah, yeah. abandoning all pretense of remotely plausible reason-giving is striking. I wonder, is it really diff from the torture memos? I'd like to believe Ryan is right (about a new baseline demand for accountability); certainly seems the pendulum is going to swing that way, at least for a minute
Posts by Matt Lord
see, e.g., a NYT headline in response to today's news
of course, one can (and should) ask both whether the admin's actions are legal and whether they are immoral. but I hear Joe writing against a real tendency for the former to box out and cloud the latter, as a tool of consent manufacturing
can't claim to speak for Joe (Margulies, author of the piece we published), but I don't read him—in this piece, or his broader work—as denying that power shouldn't account for itself.
I think his concern here is how legality debates suck the oxygen out of so much public discussion (con'd)
Our next issue is coming soon.
Featuring Lisa L. Miller on the false promise of checks and balances to stop Trump’s authoritarian assault, with @mskellymhayes.bsky.social @samuelmoyn.bsky.social @lilygeismer.bsky.social @ericblanc.bsky.social @mayaschenwar.bsky.social
bostonreview.net/memberships
"...for protests to succeed, they must be backed by movements with the ability to promise to withhold—labor, debt payments, rent payments, or consumer support—and to follow through if demands aren’t met."
Glad to have gotten the opportunity to push this line in Time
time.com/collections/...
To understand the long arc that got us to this moment, please read this extraordinary, aching, furiously brilliant essay by @morefius.bsky.social—on the murderous nexus of exceptionalism, conspiracy, and capitalism at the heart of American politics
"If our economic system cannot be made to sustain the very structures of social reproduction it makes essential to human flourishing, then we need new structures, or a new system."
Will Holub-Moorman reviews Melissa Kearney & M. E. O'Brien:
thanks for the life raft!