my rule of cool for technology is that it tends to be more awesome when no one has a fucking clue what they're doing

As someone who reads across fields, the differences in rigor and quality between indicator-captured fields and fields not yet swearing allegiance to the false god of the h-index are stark. Some fields seem to exist only to shit out bad quantitative bullshit.

honestly not really. but I think this would be a useful policy with juniors; knowing that people will be reading their prompts will hopefully make them think more intently about the problem rather than just copy pasting the issue and saying "fix plz"

this Markdown file could have been a shell script.

been using it for a while now, it's quite nice, especially compared to the alternatives. haven't had to think about it at all ever since the first setup :~)

congratulations

i too fight this struggle everyday

i support you ♥️

You know it

As for criticism, do it in good time; don't get into the habit of criticizing only after the event.

No. Rise and grind

if this was 2009 i'd say 360...........but i have adjusted my position into the correct line (ps3)

Communists must always go into the why's and wherefore's of anything, use their own heads and carefully think over whether or not it corresponds to reality and is really well founded; on no account should they follow blindly and encourage slavishness.

Where do correct ideas come from? Do they drop from the skies? No. Are they innate in the mind? No. They come from social practice and from it alone. They come from three kinds of social practice: the struggle for production, the class struggle and scientific experiment.

Where Do Correct Ideas