And also btw, some of those students now travelling away from Kent back to the so-called safety of their homes, are most likely carrying unwanted bacteria in the noses, and are returning to a population whose immune response (CD4 T cells) have been degraded by repeat Covid infections!
7/7
And also btw, surgical masks such as those being worn by Kent students in queues do not protect from an airborne pathogen. Respirator masks are required (FFP3s).
6/7
And btw, the UKHSA are being less than honest re the mode of transmission. Meningitus B can be carried on exhaled aerosol.
However, UKHSA are very worried about talking about airborne transmission, because the implications for the safety of public spaces are huge.
5/7
This outbreak is spreading because we have a vulnerable population because of their repeated Covid infections.
4/7
Things that reduce CD4 T cells include HIV and Covid.
Now that we have a population that has been subjected to repeated Covid infections, we also have a population less able to manage Men B bacteria when we contract them.
3/7
The meningitis bacteria are usually kept in check by a functioning immune response.
If that immune response is degraded (eg from low lymphocyte levels such as reduced CD4 T cells) then the meningitis bacteria are more able to enter the bloodstream.
2/7
@mrjamesob.bsky.social
Many people carry meningitis bacteria in their nose and throat and do not get ill.
It's only when the bacteria invade the body, entering the bloodstream or reaching the brain and spinal cord, that it gets very serious very quickly.
1/7
CATA (Covid Airborne Transmission Alliance) has today issued this press release ahead of next Thursday's publication of the Inquiry's module 3 report:
tinyurl.com/CATA-press-r...
Very important. 👇
CATA has found via FoI requests that government bodies did not fully disclose vital evidence to COVID Inquiry. They ignored views of PHE that airborne precautions should have been available to all HCWs. WHY?
@mrjamesob.bsky.social have you seen what Hegseth has said about ‘Greater North America’?
Have a look at this…
www.port.ac.uk/news-events-...
Plenty had a suspicion the printers was taking the hit for Reform so they could dodge a massive fine. If it holds up the forensic evidence proves intent to commit fraud and evade electoral law. Oopsies someone may be going to jail.
@samcoatessky.bsky.social See below re the Reform letter in G&D - my reply to Rob Ford's post.
This is a bigger story than not having an imprint. I believe it was a deliberate attempt to deceive voters, and then the printer had to come up with a story to cover for being found out. It's not an error
@mrjamesob.bsky.social See below re the Reform letter in G&D - my reply to Rob Ford's post.
This is a bigger story than not having an imprint. I believe it was a deliberate attempt to deceive voters, and then the printer had to come up with a story to cover for being found out. It's not an error.
5/5
...communication was on the result. The agent/publisher and the candidate could face serious fines, disqualification from holding elected office and possible jail.
In my career running and organising elections, I have overseen the print of millions of items. They are not telling the truth.
4/5
...4.
So now it is a conspiracy, involving the agent/publisher and the printer, and arguably the candidate as he has posted the statement and argued that it was all an error.
If Reform win the election, this will end up in an election court, with an argument as to how influential this...
3/5
... the fall for it by pretending they inadvertently cut off the imprint on previously authorised legitimate artwork. But miraculously, they managed to cut off the imprint without making the finished letter shorter than A4. Which means that the proofs could not have included the imprint...
2/5
...authentic, Reform chose to sign off artwork without the legally required imprint of candidate, agent/publisher and printer. So that is deliberate deception of voters. And very illegal.
2.
They were found out
3.
In order to extricate themselves, Reform have got the printer to take...
The printers are can't be telling the truth. The imprint wasn’t trimmed off. It wasn’t on the proof. If it was, the letter would be shorter, or the imprint was outside the print area. It’s a cover-up.
This is what happened in 5 posts:
1.
In order to make the ‘neighbour-to-neighbour’ letter...
And the other Inquiry is by the UK Government Work and Pensions Select Committee
Here is the link to the Inquiry, which includes a link to submit evidence. Closing date is 12 February 2026
3/3
committees.parliament.uk/committee/16...
One Inquiry is being run by the UK Government Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) and is chaired by former Health Secretary Alan Milburn.
Here is the link to submit evidence. Closing date is 30 January 2026.
2/3
www.gov.uk/government/c...
There are two official UK Inquiries currently asking why so many young people are not in work, education or training; and why so many of them are sick these days.
Both Inquiries have calls for evidence. There are links to each in the tweets linked below.
If you have evidence, please submit it
1/3
Why no change in WHO guidance?
Why no change in Government position?
Simple!
Too many big backs to cover.
Too many reputations at stake.
Too much concern about pending litigation.
@mrjamesob.bsky.social
I think the advert from Progress Action Fund in the post below summarises ICE nicely…
@mrjamesob.bsky.social
Have you come across 'Technocracy'? And the American Technate? (Musk's grandfather had an involvement.)
Look at the map in this link...
www.port.ac.uk/news-events-...
Research by the Health and Safety Executive in 2008 (“Evaluating the protection afforded by surgical masks against influenza bioaerosols”) categorically ruled out FRSMs as being effective against influenza bioaerosols.
That’s *2008*
webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/202412...
...whereas baggy blues don't. see this research below from 2008.
(and I have so much to tell you re masks in hospitals - there is a huge scandal to be uncovered there - please get in touch.)
@mrjamesob.bsky.social one reason people don't like masks (apart from the politicisation by bad actors) is that the 'baggy blues, apart from not working and being illegal as PPE, are a bit uncomfortable to wear because they slip down etc.
FFP3 masks are so much more comfortable, and they work...
