Can you explain what rights you are fighting for here?

There is a clear binary of hormone levels between the sexes.

Trips to B&Q will never be the same.

That is a fair point. Then your legal challenge must be on the simple fact the service provision is distinct for those younger than 18 and those older. Good luck with that.

It ought to raise the UK's ranking as we will no longer be sterilising kids who are coming to terms with their emerging sexuality.

Kids are not competent for everything. There are clear legal tests for what a child can consent to and what a child cannot.

These un-evidence based and ideological treatments should have never been given to distressed kids. Sanity is returning to this area.

AI is making men redundant.

That professor is almost certainly single and looking for fun.

I do hope the mass of your subjects was obtained by scales that compensate for local gravity though calibration or design.

It's the Cat's Milk in the pet shop I got confused about.

Only those who have never mixed up onion rings and calamari can laugh.

Fear and Gibson is a very marketable brand name.

So no then.

Can you name anyone who is not male or female?

Because so-called "intersex" people are still male or female. They do nothing for your argument - but try to confuse people into accepting males into female spaces. That is all you want to achieve.

So here is why you will not answer.

You want male and female changing rooms and sports.

But you want society to be unable to stop males including themselves in female spaces and sports if they so wish.

Your ideology is dishonest and abhorrent.

I have asked you to put forward a positive alternative many times now so that I know what you believe. But you refuse to.

I think I know why.

One last chance?

Yet still no positive alternative proposal from you.

So far your beliefs have destroyed female participation is sport and removed dafe places to change away from males.

Serious stuff.

But no alternative proposal from you.

You are hollow.

Males and females exist. We have rights laws based in these categories. You think that denies human rights or something. You rent e male and female sports and charging rooms. You give no coherent reason why. You offer no policy alternative.

You are full of nonsense.

You still have not given a positive proposal.

Remember, your position is denying female categories in sport to female people. Or male-free changing rooms for females.

Yet you make no positive alternative.

I am thinking you may be being dishonest.

*deflect

You defect with “intersex”

Can you propose a positive policy you work have. What would you have instead I’d make and female changing rooms and sports?

You have been clear my daughter should have no male-free sports and shower rooms. What do you propose instead?

Almost all sports are divided in male and female categories.

You are being disingenuous to avoid answering a question.

Do you think male and female toilets, changing spaces should be illegal? What about male and female sports?

What positive policy would you have? (I bet you will never answer).

Well that is an obvious nonsense. We see male and female toilets everywhere. We see sports for males and females at all levels.

Are these things against human rights in your view?

What do you propose instead for changing rooms and sports? Take a positive position on policy.

On what legal basis in rights can my daughter have a female only changing space then?

On what legal basis in rights can my daughter have a female only sports competition then?

Surely under your scheme both would be classed as discrimination against males?

SO no more elite sports for women?

No safety for my teenage daughter away from males when changing etc?

Is this the hill you will die on?

SO can you be completely clear...

You tink there should be no sex-based rights?

For example:
1) No female category is sports.
2) My teenage daughter cannot change and shower at school away from males?

Yes or no?

You are saying there should be no rights based on your sex.

Is that correct?

Indeed. Race and sex have different properties and so are treated as distinct protected characteristics with their own frameworks.