Te recuerdo que estamos a 430 ppm...

No, de nuevo. Es más bien 0,5⁰C más. No se puede hablar contigo. Ocultas tu identidad y te inventas las cosas. Adiós

Un impacto insignificante

No. El dato es que doblar el CO2 actual aumenta la temperatura MENOS de un grado centígrado.

El dato es que doblando el CO2 la temperatura aumenta menos de 1⁰C. En el artículo dicen que esa subida no justifica el alarmismo que nos vende la ONU desde el IPCC.

Se te demuestran las cosas, y sales con ataques ad hominem. No me extraña que te escondas en el cobarde anonimato...

CO2 Back-Radiation Sensitivity Studies under Laboratory and Field Conditions We measured the IR back radiation using a relatively low-cost experimental setup and a test chamber with increasing CO2 concentrations starting with a pure N2 atmosphere against a temperature-controlled black reference background. The results confirm estimations within this work and previous finding about CO2-induced infrared radiation saturation within realistic atmospheric conditions. We used this setup also to study thermal forcing effects with stronger and rare greenhouse gases against a clear night sky. Our results and their interpretation are another indication for having a more critical approach in climate modelling and against monocausal interpretation of climate indices only caused by anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. Basic physics combined with measurements and data taken from the literature allow us to conclude that CO2 induced infrared back-radiation must follow an asymptotic logarithmic-like behavior, which is also widely accepted in the climate-change community. The important question of climate sensitivity by doubling current CO2 concentrations is estimated to be below 1˚C. This value is important when the United Nations consider climate change as an existential threat and many governments intend rigorously to reduce net greenhouse gas emissions, led by an ambitious European Union inspired by IPCC assessments is targeting for more than 55% in 2030 and up to 100% in 2050 [1]. But probably they should also listen to experts [2] [3] who found that all these predictions have considerable flaws in basic models, data and impact scenarios.

Aquí tienes el experimento de laboratorio, de Hammel et al., de 2024, que demuestra que doblando el CO2 actual la temperatura sube menos de un grado, y que afirma como conclusión que el alarmismo climático está por tanto injustificado: share.google/2DsE9A2RqGwo...

La tectónica de placas se comprobó a mediados del siglo pasado, con las medidas de VLBI (Very Large Base Interferometry) obtenidas con las redes transoceánicas de radiotelescopios. Las señales de cuásares mostraron un decalaje que solo se explica con el movimiento de las placas. Déjate de bobadas.

Sigo esperando el experimento...

Yo lo que pido, y nunca enseñáis, es el dichoso experimento de laboratorio que demuestre lo que decís

A las concentraciones atmosféricas el efecto de ñl CO2 es insignificante. Demuéstranos que me equivoco.

Ya miré en su día la publicación de Arrhenius y nada. Y el experimento que pones es basura.

¿Ah sí? ¿Puedes mostrarme el experimento de laboratorio que pruebe que eso es cierto?

Arrhenius publicó que el CO2 no tiene efecto medible a concentraciones tan bajas como la atmosférica. De todas formas, ahórranos el criterio de autoridad.

Increased probability of magnitude Mw≥4.5 earthquake in Sea of Marmara area, near Istanbul, on 27±3 April 2025, New Moon tidal maximum, based on experimental tidal tectonics forecast methodology and Mw6.2 earthquake sequence initiation on 23 April 2025 ~12 am.

Prediction successful!

Increased probability of seismic reactivation of the Sagaing fault, Myanmar, for 13±3 April 2025, Full Moon. Expected earthquake magnitude above ~Mw 4.5. Experimental methodology based on tidal tectonics modeling.

Increased probability of volcanic eruption in Reykjanes peninsula, Iceland, on 13±3 April 2025, based on ground deformation and experimental tidal tectonics modeling, as approaching Full Moon.

The link between earthquakes like this and the tidal maximum today, due to New Moon + eclipse, is something that I am trying to study in a PhD for which I need financial support. I have a model to explain it all! If anyone can help me, please do not hesitate in contacting me: gonzalo_calvo@yahoo.com

Candidatos a ser invadidos

¡¡¡ZELENSKI PROPONE EL ALTO EL FUEGO A RUSIA!!!

3.6...

3.7...

3.6...

Seismic activity reactivation in #Santorini (Kolumbo underwater volcanic field) is forecasted for the 27 Feb 2025, considering upcoming New Moon of 28 Feb 2025. Magnitude of the earthquakes could be between 4 and 6. In case of a shallowing trend in the hypocenters, a volcanic eruption is expected.

@ionebelarra.bsky.social Soy el padre intelectual de Podemos. Te tienes que enterar de que el cambio climático es astrogénico, causado por ciclos astronómicos, y no antropogénico, es decir, no causado por el nivel de CO2. Debéis terminar con el dogma "ecologista". Habéis arruinado a Europa.

The slow retrograde rotation of planet #Venus can be explained by the oblique #impact structure of Haasttse-baad, which probably overturned the planetary rotation axis, thus enhancing atmospheric braking of the reversed planetary rotation. (Image by López et al.)

@neildegrassetyson.com I would like to talk with you about the opportunity of dismantling religions, following my discovery about pythagorean pentalfas on Minorca. They are the origin of both academia and churches. There are representations of the Younger Dryas combined with the goddess of the sky!

Thanks a lot! This is of great help for my work on tidal forecast. You make beautiful graphs, as always.

As forecasted by tidal tectonics modeling, seismicity under Kolumbo underwater volcano has increased during the ongoing Full Moon tidal maximum of Feb 12th. Decrease in seismicity plausible for the following few days. #SantoriniVolcano #SantoriniEarthquakes