Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Dan Cross

Post image Post image

You know I knew that Door Dash woman looked familiar

1 week ago 11246 3799 533 998
Post image

Unhinged

2 weeks ago 1504 210 132 184

Was it supposed to be a three hour tour?

2 weeks ago 0 0 0 0
Preview
The man who watches Trump all day, every day Aaron Rupar spends up to 80 hours a week following the US president, from meandering speeches to impromptu press conferences. He says it’s ‘pretty bleak’

“It’s difficult to cover him in a way that conveys how unhinged he is. Journalists are trained to be like, ‘OK, what did he say that was newsworthy?’ So you convey that to your audience. But in reality, when you actually watch, you see he's full of hatred, lying constantly, and very incoherent.”

2 weeks ago 17493 4779 640 222

Astonishing story here from noted investigative journos Dan Nolan and Peter Geoghegan: Russian oil and the Hungarian government directly fund a vast network of right wing populist writers and thinkers democracyforsale.substack.com/p/orbans-bri...

2 weeks ago 53 37 0 0

Straight Edge is clearly a drinking song.

2 weeks ago 1 0 0 0

You jerk. Now that's stuck in my head.

1 month ago 0 0 0 0

Yup. So when do they predict these things top out?

1 month ago 0 0 1 0

Google is actively partnering with companies to build small scale nuclear power reactors directly at data center sites.

1 month ago 0 0 0 0

The breakthrough required is that they need to figure out how to make energy demand sublinear with respect to increased capability. I see no evidence suggesting that's anywhere close to being on the horizon.

1 month ago 0 0 1 0
Advertisement

But that's not sustainable.

1 month ago 0 0 2 0

I'm not sure I care about business viability: I care about environmental impact and sustainability. Sure, they can boil the oceans and burn all the coal and dam up all the rivers to generate the gigawatts to meet demand, and they can drain all the water tables to keep the computers cool, and profit.

1 month ago 0 0 1 0

I think it's a combination. I think it's some gains in efficiency (MoE, for instance), some increases in revenue, and a _lot_ of VC cash.

1 month ago 0 0 0 0

That's the thing: no one _really_ knows, and people are making a _lot_ of assumptions as they speculate. That does _not_ give me a warm fuzzy.

It seems to me, at a minimum, that a lot of optimism is predicated on the assumption of breaking some pretty fundamental barriers, and soon.

1 month ago 0 0 1 0

I see data that suggest that they are, and no evidence suggesting that they are not. And yeah, the consequences for the rest of us are going to be bad.

There's clearly utility here. Some impressive things can be done. The limitations are obvious, though.

1 month ago 0 0 0 0

Moore's law necessarily stopped because of physics: you can only double density so many times per unit volume before you hit fundamental limitations of physical reality. But LLMs just aren't the same; when do they top out?

1 month ago 1 0 0 0

Again, I go back to Moore's law: compute was driven by semiconductors getting twice as dense per unit area _at half the cost_ for ~40 years. There is nothing comparable for LLMs: an LLM may get twice as good in 2 years, but at 4x the cost, even after efficiency gain factors.

1 month ago 0 0 3 0

I know.

But I'm not sure I have seen enough evidence to agree, and some data I have seen suggests this is not true.

1 month ago 0 0 1 0

They're also huge and and can afford to divert the assets in the short term, banking they'll have an advantage once the bubbble bursts.

It's like how the US ran up the national debt to bankrupt the Soviet Union during the cold war.

1 month ago 0 0 1 0
Advertisement

Not really, no. The energy cost to produce new computers relative to volume of computation went _down_. That's not happening here at all. Energy cost to create new models is going _up_.

1 month ago 0 0 2 0

There's nothing remotely comparable to Moore's law for LLMs. Once the VC cash runs out, the cost will skyrocket.

1 month ago 0 0 1 0

I'm aware of the math, but it doesn't really change the point. Energy cost is growing superlinearly to increase the capacity of LLMs; that's not sustainable.

Compare to computers writ large. Contrast the energy efficiency of your laptop vs ENIAC, in comparison to the raw aggregate power of both.

1 month ago 0 0 2 0

Ironically, I just asked Gemini about this and it responded that a 2x increase in model capability will require a 10x increase in energy consumption. That is, linear increases in capability require exponentially more resources. That's not sustainable.

Did it hallucinate?

1 month ago 3 0 1 0

But it WILL slice a chunk of your thumb off...(Ask me how I know!).

1 month ago 0 0 1 0

The Wu is coming through.

1 month ago 0 0 0 0

Neighbors left their shovel out (which has been very handy as I don’t have one with a big scoop!) and my UniFi doorbell keeps periodically detecting it as a package.

Is this AI

1 month ago 3 1 0 0

Every day I am filled with hate because my heart overflows with my love of the computer. aftermath.site/ram-prices-h...

2 months ago 4099 1290 38 64

It's just... like... you know....vibes, man.

2 months ago 2 0 0 0
Advertisement

Having a linguistics background I think there's a huge misconception when it comes to prompting LLM's, the vast majority thinks that coding is "hard" compared with speaking a natural language. Well it's actually the contrary from a utilitarian POV less verbs at your disposal => easier to be specific

2 months ago 53 6 2 2

That's certainly true, but has anyone checked up on whether the cavalry is on its way yet? Cause we need that as a prerequisite as soon as possible.

2 months ago 0 0 0 0