Just about daily, I read articles about how a driver was going 70+ in a 35.
When, as a civil society, will we ask: why the hell is it possible to go 70+ in a 35 mph zone?
Posts by Seth LaJeunesse
Omaha just made its entire all-electric bikeshare free to residents. The CEO’s reasoning: fares only covered 10–15% of costs anyway. At some point “free bikeshare” stops being radical and starts being honest about what public mobility is.
usa.streetsblog.org/2026/04/21/b...
Walking is healthy, convivial, deeply human. It harms the least: other people, other species, the air, the water, the land.
Civil societies design for people on foot. Full stop.
TY to this stellar research team for making that case with rigor and urgency.
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Time to align 4 textbooks with reality.
It would seem motonormativity was in fact, normative.
Maddening nonetheless.
Black and Hispanic Americans walk more — more trips, longer distances. They also walk on the most dangerous roads. Defunding pedestrian infrastructure isn’t a neutral budget call. It’s a decision about whose movement we’ve decided to protect.
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.....
Forcing people to spend hundreds of hours a year in unpaid transit just to access their jobs.
We call it "the commute."
From 2019 through 2024, home prices up 48%, with incomes up 22%.
This is not a traffic problem. It's an expropriation of time, unevenly distributed across class.
NYC community boards are pushing to move parking enforcement from NYPD back to DOT.
Reflection: enforcement authority should sit with the agency whose mission is street safety, not the one whose culture treats parking as a low-priority afterthought.
nyc.streetsblog.org/2026/04/13/p...
In my town, exceedingly few 8 year-olds can safely cross the ubiquitous stroad to get to and from their schools, yet 90%+ of the local discourse about transportation in these parts centers around where to park one's private property.
Beveridge et al. (2024) call the strategic attachment of right-wing grievance politics to roads, energy, and the 15-Minute City “infrastructural populism.” Worth checking out, especially if you work in road safety or active transport. compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
Past time to mobilize MADD-level advocacy behind intelligent speed assistance (ISA) in all cars.
For max impact, add: “from trusted others.”
Totally missed that part in the article!
Probably missed the section about investing in transit.
"Traffic fatality rates increase with annual vehicle-miles. Planning decisions that increase vehicle travel increase crashes, and vehicle travel reduction policies increase safety." - @toddlitman.bsky.social
www.planetizen.com/blogs/129507...
@urbantruth.bsky.social @brenttoderian.bsky.social
A poster that reads “Slow Dahn!” in Pittsburgh’s Market Square, which is presently under construction.
Pittsburgh traffic calming.
Sign reading “Donald Trump is a Jagoff” at the Pittsburgh No Kings Rally
Pittsburgh No Kings Rally, March 28, 2026
No Kings Pittsburgh
Cities reallocated streets for walking and cycling during COVID because a crisis made it politically possible. New research asks: why does it take that? The plans were already written.
doi.org/10.1177/0042...
Good day, everyone! Excited to share that I'll be speaking at the @policingproject's 2026 Convening on Right-Sizing Traffic Enforcement at NYU Law on April 27–28.
If you work in traffic safety, criminal justice reform, or
transportation policy, join me there: 2026trafficconvening.splashthat.com
Active transportation planning has been built around the image of a young, able-bodied person. Two wheels, two feet, forward motion. A new paper asks: what happens to everyone excluded by this design template? www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
I’m quite aware, as I most certainly did not coin the term “motonormativity!” Thank you for sharing! What I’m proposing is that motonormativity is a rational, adaptive response to our century-in-the-making auto-dependent milieux.
Cultural bias with a healthy dose of regulatory capture?
Premise:
Motonormativity (aka “car brain”) is the result of adapting, as humans so capably do, to auto-dominated physical, financial, social, and political environments.
Thoughts?
Neuroinclusive design principles:
Provide sensory-friendly spaces (acoustic/lighting control), clear, intuitive layout design, and diverse, adaptable, and quiet areas to manage stimulation.
Sounds like car-free spaces.
Been thinking how anti-hope propaganda (e.g., your op-ed is useless, that protest was worthless—as though visible and collective actions never help build momentum) is little more than “I’m so clever and world-wide” signaling.
That we won’t get very far in the mode shift program if we simply appeal to folks’ financial or moral sensibilities. Instead, we have to restructure the entire constellation of incentives so that driving becomes relatively less attractive/adaptive than biking/walking/rolling/transit. Easy peasy.
Having thought a good long while about how to incite measurable mode shift, I’m at last coming to terms with the notion that driving—in the vast majority of places in the U.S.—is an entirely rational behavior given the nature of our material, financial, political and social environments.
Not tonight.