But all those jobs lost to AI will be replaced with more jobs for people to surprise and attack CEOs in bathrooms. It’ll all net out in the end.

My biggest skepticism is a simpler one--who are these people paying for these services who don't have the other forms of capital that would make these services irrelevant?

I was obsessed with this video in college. Would watch it for hours at a time.

The dang orange cheetos crypto tsar amirite?!?!??!!’

I just assumed you were using a fancy philosophy word. Started racking my brains for Latin words this could be. Landed on “bursa” thought “hmmm a ’digital sack’. What’s he cooking?”

This should have a giant red disclaimer “your usage is subsidized!!”

Literally not every lawyer.

Fair enough then. But still

Didn’t the whole thread start with a lawyer building his own tool using basic prompting and tool calling? Who I assume is not an llm expert either?

I want to read the whole thing but the acknowledgment on the first page is tough to get through

Sounds like you are the one who is cutting corners. A Reddit comment as a blog WHERE IS THE BLOGGING RIGOR DAVID?!

David Crespo.

Ultimately, at least for me, there is no reason to break Dark Forest protocol to share this opinion because some of the richest companies in the world are putting out the word that these things work. Except I guess I just did, damn it

This is currently the number 1 brightest dividing line between people I would work with again and people I wouldn’t. Many of the people I wouldn’t, shout from the rooftops that this stuff doesn’t work. Those I would, whisper to each other that it does.