How are efforts to make polluters pay progressing in 2026?
In our next webinar InfluenceMap and leading experts will explore efforts to hold the world’s largest corporate polluters accountable.
🗓️ Wednesday, April 15, 1300 BST/ 0800 EDT
Sign up here: influencemap.org/event/Carbon...
🚨NEW: Our latest report shows how a cross-border network of fossil fuel companies & industry associations in Japan & Australia is exerting influence on government LNG policy, prolonging the use of fossil gas across the region.
Read more: influencemap.org/briefing/LNG...
New report out from @influencemap.bsky.social shows that an increasingly shrinking number of large fossil fuel producers generate a majority of global CO2 emissions
insideclimatenews.org/news/2101202...
Half of world’s CO2 emissions come from just 32 fossil fuel firms, study shows
- Critics accuse leading firms of sabotaging climate action but say data increasingly being used to hold them to account
@influencemap.bsky.social
#climatecrisis
Story by me
www.theguardian.com/environment/...
The Carbon Majors database is a crucial tool for attribution and accountability among ghg emitters.
Most recently - used to support legislation like the Climate Superfund laws in Vermont and New York and the five more proposed across the US.
The research also finds:
🏭 State-controlled emitters dominated global emissions in 2024, contributing 57% of global fossil CO₂ emissions.
⚡ 50% of global emissions are linked to just 32 companies, showing increasing consolidation among the highest emitters.
Read the coverage:
🚨New Data: 17 of the top 20 emitters in 2024 controlled by governments that opposed a fossil fuel phase-out at COP30
InfluenceMap’s 🆕 update to the Carbon Majors database includes the latest emissions data, painting a stark picture of rising emissions—particularly from state-controlled entities👇
Join our next webinar 👉 ’How the EU Can Set the Aviation Industry on Track for Net Zero’
🗓️ Thursday December 11, 1430 GMT
✈️ This webinar will cover how existing regulations fail, how industry has fought regulation & how the EU can facilitate emissions reductions
📌 influencemap.org/event/How-th...
🌍 Overall, European asset managers scored consistently higher than their peers, while North American managers saw scores decrease between 2023 and 2024. Japanese asset managers demonstrated a marked overall improvement in their climate lobbying stewardship between 2021 and 2024.
Read more 👇
🗝️ Key investor initiatives highlight the importance of policy engagement to address the financial risks posed by climate change.
Yet, many of the world’s largest asset managers are failing to step up on this topic with only 7/39 asset managers demonstrating best practice stewardship.
⏰ 🚨 New from InfluenceMap's FinanceMap Platform ➡️ Asset Managers & Climate Lobbying Stewardship
🔎 This analysis of the world’s largest asset managers shows only a small group exhibits best practice in this field - with the majority not robustly engaging with their investee companies on the topic 🧵
📣 Tonight! Join us and this brill panel to learn about the damage caused by oily lobbying and how we can overpower its influence to shape climate & energy policy for public good!
🎟️ bit.ly/powered-poll...
🌟 @graceblakeley.substack.com @fuelpovertyaction.bsky.social
@influencemap.bsky.social
Analyzing 1,500+ evidence pieces across almost 300 companies & industry groups 2022 - 2024 InfluenceMap finds:
69% of communications only name-dropped or included a broad reference to a just transition
11% used just transition language to argue for an extended role for fossil fuels 🔎👇
🚨New 🚨InfluenceMap research looking at corporate use of Just Transition language finds that most corporate use of the term is Vague or Misleading.
While #COP30 delegates try to agree a mechanism for a just transition - corporates appear behind on meaningful engagement in their communications🧵
3️⃣ Almost 2/3(64.5%) of misleading narratives from the fossil fuel industry regarding the energy transition were used in 🗣️CEO messaging or direct engagement with policymakers🗣️ demonstrating how these narratives are part of a deliberate high-level strategy aimed at shaping the policy environment.
2️⃣ The oil & gas industries' most used arguments focus on emphasizing the benefits of fossil gas for 💰affordability & energy security💰, leading these types of arguments to overtake those that emphasize limitations/uncertainties of alternative solutions (its previously favoured talking point).
1️⃣ Between COP20 and COP30, oil and gas companies and their industry associations 📈increased📈 their use of misleading narratives about the energy transition by one third compared to the year before COP29.
🚨📣InfluenceMap has just launched our Annual COP Narrative Tracker
Keeping track of the favoured narratives from the oil and gas industry over the last year.
This year - three key facts stood out from the analysis 👇🧵
cop.influencemap.org/NarrativeFac...
🇧🇷📣What does corporate lobbying look like in Brazil right now?
New analysis from InfluenceMap has found that a lack of strategic engagement on climate policies is leaving them vulnerable to vested-interest lobbying, particularly from oil & gas, and agriculture 👀👇
influencemap.org/briefing/Bra...
🚨📣New report from InfluenceMap 🌐 Big Tech’s Battle for the Future of Emissions Accounting🌐
How the world’s largest technology companies are using sponsored research to advance their preferred emissions accounting metrics👇
Read the full report: influencemap.org/report/Techn...
📢 🚨New Report - How the UK oil and gas industry spent 15 years pushing for subsidies & incentives for Carbon Capture and Storage rather than regulatory accountability or science-based emissions reductions; maintaining a funding pipeline for a technology yet to deliver on its promises 👇
"Many oil and gas companies advocating for #CCS in UK have simultaneously raised issues with the technical feasibility and commercial viability of CCS in other countries when faced with regulation"
Report by @influencemap.bsky.social
#climatecrisis
influencemap.org/report/The-U...
➕🚗🏭 new calculations show that if all new gas plants with CCS currently proposed by industry were to go ahead - even at a 90% capture rate - they could emit 2.4-5 million tons of carbon dioxide equivalent emissions annually, the same as adding 1.3-2.6 million petrol cars per year in the UK.
📢 🚨New Report - How the UK oil and gas industry spent 15 years pushing for subsidies & incentives for Carbon Capture and Storage rather than regulatory accountability or science-based emissions reductions; maintaining a funding pipeline for a technology yet to deliver on its promises 👇
⏰✈️ Don’t forget to sign up tomorrow's InfluenceMap's webinar: “Have Vested Interests Captured the UN’s Aviation Agency on Climate?”
🗓️ Wednesday, October 8, 10:00–11:00 EDT | 15:00–16:00 BST
Sign up now: us06web.zoom.us/webinar/regi...
Don't miss InfluenceMap's next webinar in partnership with TERI, 10:30 AM BST tomorrow -
“How the Corporate Sector Can Drive Ambitious Climate Action in India.”
Hear from experts on how companies and investors can drive climate action in India 🇮🇳
Sign up now ⬇️
us06web.zoom.us/webinar/regi...
"InfluenceMap found Canada’s big five banks (RBC, TD, BMO, CIBC and Scotiabank) provided US$131 bn to fossil fuel companies in 2024, on average representing 18% of their entire financing portfolios. That’s more than twice than the top US banks, & more than three times their top European peers." 👀👇
Analysis of lobbying on these bills and laws finds that prominent fossil fuel industry associations representing many of these producers are leading opposition to this nationwide, alongside large cross-sector industry groups.
Read more👇
influencemap.org/briefing/Cal...
New research 🚨👉 At least 47 extractive oil and gas companies could be liable under California’s proposed Polluters Pay Climate Superfund Act, according to the Carbon Majors database.
At least 18 of these 47 companies are members of the American Petroleum Institute (API).
This latest report finds that the Big Five Canadian banks averaged $0.21 in green financing for every $1 in fossil fuel financing in 2024, substantially below the 0.68:1 ratio achieved by top European banks, indicating a lack of commitment to the climate transition.
Read the report in full: