Banning that would be unjust. Just use a different service provider that sucks less or try to get the company to change the policy.
Posts by Will Kiely
Are you merely saying that estimates aren't *necessary* (weak claim), or are you saying that estimates are *never helpful* (strong claim)? (I sense a possible motte-and-bailey fallacy.)
Why 19%?
Awesome :) -- I enjoyed listening to the book in December.
Random comment, Ethan: Have you been informed that in your audiobook you call RLHF "RHLF" repeatedly?
@vitalikca.bsky.social is a fake account. Vitalik's real acxount is: @vitalik.ca . FYI my followers who follow the fake account: @stefanschubert.bsky.social , @ozziegooen.bsky.social , @charlesd353.bsky.social , @ahappier.world @ericneyman.bsky.social
I don't like the character limit.
My guess is whoever made the graphic put the earliest year mentioned by the person.
E.g Hinton has said 5 to 20 years, so the graphic-maker put 5 years, i.e. 2029. Similarly 2026 is the earliest Amodei has said. Altman has been most ambiguous, but I read him as having a longer timeline than Amodei.
Yes it is, thanks.
This graphic is wrong about peoples' AI timelines.
On Oct 1st, 2024, Demis Hassabis said: "I think there's still two or three big innovations needed [...] to we get to AGI and that's why I'm on more of a 10-year time scale than others [...] I think 10 years is about right." youtu.be/lLgWzsrc1BA?...
The years in the graphic are not accurate for (at least) Hassabis, Amodei, and Altman. Please don't propagate misinformation.
Sources in spreadsheet. E.g. Hassabis is ~2034 as of 2024-10-01: "...AGI system... and that's why I'm on more of a 10-year time scale... I think 10 years is about right."
The years in the graphic are not accurate for (at least) Hassabis, Amodei, and Altman.
Sources in this spreadsheet. E.g. Hassabis is ~2034 as of 2024-10-01: "...AGI system... and that's why I'm on more of a 10-year time scale than others... I think 10 years is about right."
Since I've been here for a while… here are some useful features on Bluesky that you might not have discovered yet! 🧵
Hoping it'll be better than alternatives, e.g. due to better recommender algorithms. I already like that 'likes' are public, unlike on X.
People don't bring up neuroscience during explanations of psychological phenomena much in my experience at all, so your 90% experience with a presumably much-larger-denominator-than-mine may be heavily influenced by selection effects.
I 'followed all' due to thinking you did a good job with this post (the only post of yours I've read yet): www.transformernews.ai/p/what-trump...
"Writing Doom" is a 27-minute short film that won a $20,000 Grand Prize from the Future of Life Institute. I recommend it. www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfMQ...
"Notable Peoples' Views on AI - AI Quotes [Public]" docs.google.com/spreadsheets...
I'm collecting quotes on AI timelines, AI risk, AI forecasts, and the impact of AI.
Nice. Social media platforms can add a lot of value. I hope this one continues to grow rapidly and provides more value than its competitors.