Librarians and information professionals – please join one of our focus groups to help us better understand how to develop tools and guidance that support you and your researchers. bit.ly/4sK3kje
@floriannaudet.bsky.social @ioanaacristea.bsky.social @deevybee.bsky.social @retractionwatch.com
PubPeer Comments here, including comments by
@ioanaacristea.bsky.social @ianhussey.mmmdata.io @gidmk.bsky.social
pubpeer.com/publications...
1. The paper with the implausibly large effects of Omega-3 fatty acids on mental health was now retracted. A little thread on the process where @ianhussey.mmmdata.io and I was involved.
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
The excitement I get when I read mind-blowing discoveries like these is why I got into science to begin with
Lovin’ that science can buoy me up still despite the world turning into a dumpster fire all around us (which gets me down every day)
We are now working on evaluating its implementation to move towards practical solutions. In parallel, we are conducting a few studies to assess whether performing such checks (for example, by peers) can improve practices expected to enhance reproducibility.
For our consortium, it represents a first step in developing and testing a range of interventions to improve research reproducibility. The proposed list of core items is an initial foundation.
This marks an important milestone for the OSIRIS project, funded by the European Commission and led by Inge Stegeman.
... This tool aims to improve the reproducibility of methods and results throughout all phases of the research process and, more generally, to promote a broader cultural shift toward transparent, reliable research."
... The set of minimum requirements presented here outlines core expectations regarding planning, methods, data collection, management and analysis, and dissemination...
"Evidence-based solutions are needed to help improve reproducibility in research. This Consensus View presents a consensus-based list of core reproducibility items for research that has been developed by a multidisciplinary group interested in research, open science, and reproducibility...
Led by Rita Banzi, this work reflects a truly collaborative effort, with an amazing team including Monika Varga, Yuri Andrei Gelsleichter, Constant VINATIER (special 👏 for the terrific Figure 1), David Moher, and all members of the OSIRIS-Delphi Study Group.
🚨 🎉 Our CONSENSUS VIEW, “An international consensus on core reproducibility items in research,” is now out in @plosbiology.org 🎉 🚨
journals.plos.org/plosbiology/...
A preprint is here: www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1...
Fluoxetine is the most commonly prescribed antidepressant for pediatric depression (there are some references in the text).
By the way, the preprint is here. www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1...
Fluoxetine is quite common in the clinical practice. It is the first choice in general for those who want to use an antidepressant in this population.
@ploederl.bsky.social has jus submitted revisions.
It is ongoing and will be published soon hopefully (minor revisions).
Enjoyed the talk (just watched video). Have you published on the zombie funding? And how common is the fluoxetine treatment in clinical practice?
The recording of our talk about how a single small "zombie"-trial skewed the results of influential network meta-analyses is available here:
drive.google.com/file/d/1nyP7...
@richlyus.bsky.social @floriannaudet.bsky.social
The ERROR project recruits independent experts to recheck social sciences papers’ data, statistics, methodology, code; now the project plans to publish the reviews in a new peer-reviewed journal.
science.org/content/arti...
@dalmeet.bsky.social @science.org
#reproducibility
The earth rises above the moon
The moon eclipses
Meanwhile, far away from all the worst people…
(New photos from the Artemis II mission released by NASA.)
New paper (embargoed)... out April 16. 🤫
Oops, my mistake! It’s actually April 10th, not the 13th.
Camille will review her recent efforts to better understand and manage the different sources of this analytical variability in neuroimaging."
For many years, these choices have been regarded as implementation details, but it is becoming increasingly clear that the exact choices of analytical strategy can lead to different and sometimes contradictory results.
Neuroimaging studies are characterized by a very large analysis space, and practitioners usually have to choose between different software, software versions, algorithms, parameters, etc.
"When a change in analysis methods leads to different results, what does it mean for our research findings? In this presentation, she will discuss reproducibility in brain imaging.
Upcoming LORIER Ambassadors webinar scheduled for Friday, April 13th, at 12:30 PM.
Reproducibility in Brain Imaging
Camille Maumet, Inria, Univ Rennes, CNRS, Inserm
Contact me if you want a link.
