Sounds like you have a media literacy problem then.
Posts by Simon Mitchell
It can absolutely be indiscriminate with reference to whether it kills combatants and civilians based on the type of ordinance being used but still informed by a target selection process. If you’re going to nitpick over semantics it helps to have some idea of the events themselves.
So Lammy and Starmer lied to the British people that UK reconnoissance flights were being used to inform the indiscriminate bombing of civilians in Gaza. Now they’ve let slip that we’ve effectively gone to war with Iran.
How would a book a bout the bird of Sheffield be useful in describing a national trend? There are probably fewer than 20 Rough-legged Buzzard records in Sheffield ever.
🎶That ain’t workin, that’s the way you do it,
Missles for 5% of GDP🎶
To get a round of applause from a question time audience for openly criticising Churchill is pretty much unprecedented. Very skilfully and plainly explained.
Colonisation? Were they ever not there?
“Retweet for awareness”
This is not a one off
Nothing libellous when it’s self evident in the post above.
Since he’s been cheerleading US & Israeli bombing in Iran (which resulted in 150 dead at a girls primary school today), I thought now would be a good time to out @zootherabirding.bsky.social as the virulent racist that he is. Wouldn’t be caught in a million miles of a Zoothera birding tour!
The hope is they churn out enough drivel to poison the future training datasets, which recursively degrades all AI capabilities. Best single action for bird photography would be for Cornell actively pursuing and prosecute anyone who scrapes the MacAulay library
For me, I think the extensive ash-grey on the forehead rear of face and ear coverts is the thing that stands out the most
Not sure why it is about these birds , but they are extremely distinctive looking. Even scrolling through the feed I clicked it before reading your text
I'm not exaggerating, almost every dog owner I know would be just fine with this. When I suggest they should consider wildlife when out walking their dog they look at me as though I'm mad.
Who needs AI bots, when this guy can steal your content just the same
A dapper wintering Bluetail at @wendlingbeck.bsky.social continues to show on & off today. Bird on private land & owners are keen for birders to be help not hinderance to the community. Therefore, I've been asked to organise a donation pot for St Mary's Church upkeep. ko-fi.com/simonleomitc...
We are going to irreversibly degrade the biosphere for the sake of people asking 'Grok' to explain simple memes and/or generating pictures of cats that look like Hitler.
‘Ai generated content’ 🤡
Absolutely stunning thing. Surely the most impressive new bird species since Scarlet-banded Barbet?
Not sure the guy who snuggly ate Ortolan on camera and constantly uses his TV show to moan about badgers and neonicotinoid bans is the best person to be writing the article though…
That’s totally fair enough, which is why I was initially asking it as a question before the other bloke chimed in.
You’re obsessed pal.
If they just pick them all, photograph them and leave them to rot, yes. Goodbye
Legal ≠ ethical. Have a nice day.
Makes me feel a bit daft for pretty much giving up on searching for the autumn a week. Kind of feel like it needs a colder snap to get things to move around a bit again though..
Flowers also decay as soon as they reach peak bloom. It’s not ethical to kick over a dead tree just because it’s decaying. It’s complete disregard for anyone else’s enjoyment of nature to do this, in part because it’s also complete unnecessary to achieving the photos.
Except that analogy is wholly flawed because he’s removed a fruiting body before it has wholly ripened. The comparison would be to pulling the most of the flowers off an apple tree before the fruit developed.