We often ask who wins elections. But who decides to run? New @electoralstudies.bsky.social w/@mhayes.bsky.social: Multi-member districts ⬆️ Black candidate emergence—and political empowerment matters. We revisit assumptions about US electoral design and show who enters the pipeline—not just who wins.
Posts by Matthew Hayes
Florida State University’s polisci dept just posted 3 jobs: a junior job in American political behavior and open rank jobs in American public policy and American public law/judicial politics. The Polisci dept here is a great place to work. Come join us!
Happy to answer questions if you have them.
This is an excellent opportunity for early career scholars! Graduate students and recent graduates interested in public opinion or political behavior should apply.
Really pleased that my @annualreviews.bsky.social on "Gender and Leadership in Executive Branch Politics" w/ @tiffanydbarnes.bsky.social is now out!
www.annualreviews.org/content/jour...
WUSTEPS announcement flyer. Deadline March 7 2025. Find more information and apply at: sites.wustl.edu/wusteps/
WashU PoliSci is hosting its third annual summer research program for undergraduates! Applications are due March 7. If you know students who might be thinking of grad school and want to get hands-on research experience, encourage them to apply at: sites.wustl.edu/wusteps/
Washington University Summer Training Experience in Political Science flyer
WashU PoliSci is hosting its second summer research program for undergraduates! We will begin reviewing applications in 2 weeks. If you know students who might be thinking of grad school and want to get hands-on research experience, encourage them to apply at: sites.wustl.edu/wusteps/
And thanks for serving as a research mentor! The mentored research experience was really the cornerstone of the program. Can't wait to continue the program next summer
📣The Journal of Experimental Political Science is calling for submissions of papers validating experimental treatments.📣
Deadline is December 10.
Polisky
I think you're right sometimes. But my piece on using names in experiments, for example, would have been much worse if we had done a deep dive into a theory/history of racially/gender distinct names since we really wanted to make a practical contribution.
I tend to like short pieces that make an important empirical contribution without new theory. I recently edited a piece I loved at JEPS that had a null finding that I think is important for political scientists and the public to be aware of, but didn't delve into theory