Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Rich Seviora

if they’re putting out content to paid subscribers that’s under someone’s name (without clearly stating they didn’t write it) without said person actually authoring it, isn’t that fraud?

13 hours ago 1 0 1 0

I feel like Sun Tzu really missed out on "Invent Pete Hegseth and give him to the enemy"

14 hours ago 3414 550 42 9

what you said and what you quoted are basically incompatible

1 day ago 23 1 0 0

is this some weird yelling kink thing

1 day ago 3 0 0 0

Mine is “A players hire A players. Bs hire Cs. Unethical incompetent shit goblins hire losers who’d never ever get that job under a normal presidency.”

1 day ago 2 0 0 0

I don’t know how to sit with the fact that this weird family that hits on interns doesn’t even register for me as a scandal in this admin

1 day ago 1 0 1 0

I like how I had no idea this woman even existed let alone had multiple scandals

1 day ago 1 0 1 0

Not to my knowledge. They stopped being visible to me some weeks before.

1 day ago 1 0 0 0

what's going on with Claude Opus 4.7 today? I asked it to make two relatively well scoped changes and somehow that blew through my entire session?

1 day ago 0 0 1 0

have you considered that someone who is actually paid to do the job is more likely to have actually tested the thing than you are?

2 days ago 8 0 1 0
Advertisement

or maybe you’ve overestimated the LLM’s ability to properly analyze context and meaning

otherwise people would be out here showing actual results saying “here I have shown this thing can work correctly” instead of non-practitioner merely saying “skill issue” to a practitioner

2 days ago 2 0 1 0
Post image

I was thinking about Surface Detail. Jolier was the antagonist. And, well

2 days ago 4 0 0 0

Is it the one with the intaligated or whatever woman?

2 days ago 4 0 1 0

like if he’s arguing “public servants are underpaid and we shouldn’t mock public servants for being trans” I agree!

But I kinda doubt that’s what he meant!

2 days ago 2 0 0 0

It’s kinda amazing how that writing is so contentless as to defy actual interpretation.

like it’s thought shaped without any content beyond useless bromides like “they are not paid correctly” and “people get criticized for being in public life” without any indicator about what it suggests

2 days ago 4 0 3 0

hey there more fire there is the more times it can cease

2 days ago 1 0 0 0

Probably not much market for illicit data center GPUs

3 days ago 1 0 0 0
Advertisement

I’m reminded of all the people who said things like Genocide Joe while also claiming they were just trying to persuade him

3 days ago 6 1 0 0

👀

4 days ago 0 0 0 0

You look like a Gen Z middle manager about to do a performance review

4 days ago 3 0 0 0

There will be a class of engineers who have outsourced their cognition to a LLM. I’m seeing it now.

4 days ago 5 0 2 0

so the outcome is that you have basically substance-less prose being wielded by people who can’t identify the lack of substance and they are harming their own credibility because people quickly realize “this person has offloaded the cognitive loop to a machine”

4 days ago 2 0 0 0

What’s interesting is that people are now able to use credible sounding prose in ways they haven’t been before (which is good IMO), but because they’ve previously experienced polished prose with narrative substance, they’re using the polish assuming that the substance is a downstream property.

4 days ago 3 0 1 0

what

5 days ago 10 1 1 0

what the heck

how does someone uncanny valley a human

5 days ago 3 0 0 0
Advertisement

I recognized that exact quote. Also why “as a child” is very… load bearing

5 days ago 0 0 1 0

or maybe they just made the “silly rule” to make the game more fun

5 days ago 6 0 0 0

If it's AWS networking it's always the security group

even if it isn't it is

seriously check it again

5 days ago 0 0 0 0
Transgender discrimination is, by its very nature, sex discrimination. Discrimination based on sex is expressly prohibited under Montana’s unique Nondiscrimination Clause––“[n]either the state nor any person, firm, corporation, or institution shall discriminate on account of . . . sex . . . .” Thus, Article II, Section 4 is
unequivocal in its intolerance for discrimination based on sex. Because sex discrimination involves a fundamental right under Article II, the appropriate level of judicial review is strict scrutiny. Snetsinger, ¶ 17.

¶28 Being transgender is also a suspect class under the Equal Protection Clause of
Article II, Section 4,––“[n]o person shall be denied equal protection of the law.”

Transgender discrimination is, by its very nature, sex discrimination. Discrimination based on sex is expressly prohibited under Montana’s unique Nondiscrimination Clause––“[n]either the state nor any person, firm, corporation, or institution shall discriminate on account of . . . sex . . . .” Thus, Article II, Section 4 is unequivocal in its intolerance for discrimination based on sex. Because sex discrimination involves a fundamental right under Article II, the appropriate level of judicial review is strict scrutiny. Snetsinger, ¶ 17. ¶28 Being transgender is also a suspect class under the Equal Protection Clause of Article II, Section 4,––“[n]o person shall be denied equal protection of the law.”

MONTANA SUPREME COURT: “Transgender discrimination is, by its very nature, sex discrimination,” and is subject to strict scrutiny under the Montana Constitution.

6 days ago 6451 1520 47 153

What about Santa Con Con

Or Santa Con Conned Santa Con

6 days ago 0 0 0 0