Sensitivity analyses?, the reviewer asked. Umm ✅ done and done

All really impressive! This is nfl strength impressive!

Simply the best! Same for me—required reading

Just read and would highly recommend. Great piece all around, well balanced.

Alex: HiTOP may be grassroots and maybe also greaseroots, too 🤣
And agree: it’s many putting in time for love and importance of this fundamental set of issues!

Way to go Wisconsin! Onward and forward!

Thank you for sharing Kevin. Completely spot on with all of it. It’s going to take many individuals with hope and courage, groups and communities working together. We also need leaders who can act and have power to stop bad decisions and reverse harm. And we need to speak and stand up so they hear

Way to go Kevin! Great pics. Are you open to sharing your speech? Would love to read what you shared to the Seattle scientific community

Good choice. Totally one of my comfort movies. And quite appropriate as we can’t lose hope in the darkness that is Mordor-trump-Sauron. Tolkien wrote about not losing hope in the darkness, and never more relevant

What did you share that you are comfortable sharing that can help incoming students and faculty who care about training and working collaboratively with incoming and current students?

Thanks for this brief history. Any additional links or information you can provide for those interested i this history?

Let’s hope so. Supposed to need act of congress, as with so many other “changes” in last few weeks

Professing????

I emailed today sro for study section planned for mid February. Sro said it’s still on as planned, at least in February

Is there a pun to be made about the box canyon here? You know you can pun one Tom

Art to match the mood

So mostly thoughts are—super cool work, raises more needed science on who (eg age, alcohol use severity) to better understand why, when, etc. I’d guess the individual dynamics you found would change with older individuals who have heavier and more regular alcohol use over time given the longer life

I wonder how much results are dependent on your sample which was mostly young adults, so results of many individuals who drink for social positive motivation may depend on development (not older or middle aged drinkers, who might drink to cope with news in the world and stress!)

A little science nerd out on a day that calls for focus on discussing some interesting science. I loved the paper! Super cool and interesting the varied “profiles” that characterize young adult drinking based on affect, expectancies etc.

Thanks for sharing. Way to go Rosi! Fully agree the award is well deserved for this science rockstar

Good point and question: how many people’s uni or dept provide a course release/ teaching credit for journal edit or grant review service? Be nice to have data on who does and doesn’t get release or credit.

Right on Hannah! In practice with grant review over years I think many have done what you implied about innovation, but better that nih change to make it explicit that novelty innovation is not the main point. Here’s hoping change helps. Curious to see with my doing my next grant review coming up

I do hope you write that book! Honestly though thanks for the social media length replies. Got what you’re saying and makes good sense. I could imagine many ways to go forward and was curious to hear your thoughts. Thanks!

Look forward to reading. Can you say more what you mean by “reign of affect as blunt instrument …. Must end”? What do you think should be different, how, why? What areas do you think need to get better and how does “affect” fit into that change you’d like to see? Very curious re your views, thanks

I taught it before to size in 300s. Used to play theme based music at the start of each class (eg “borderline” by Madonna). had some guest speakers of folks with lived experiences share their stories as well as usual videos on which students would discuss sxs. Also caregivers present for kids dxs

Great minds think alike! I did the same in my grad psychopathology class this fall. And like Aidan, answer is it’s complicated. Still a great exercise for us all to do, and for students to learn and think through.

Indiana8
Miami 8
Yale8
USC7
Washing6
Berkeley5
duke5
Georgia5
Harvard5
iowa5
kansas5
Penn State5
UNC5
UVA5
ASU4
Bingham4
Boston4
Boulder4
Buffalo4
Michigan 4
OSU4
Penn4
San Diego4
vanderbilt4
Albany3
UBC 3
Columbia 3
emory 3
missouri 3
Oregon 3
Purdue 3
queens 3
rutgers 3
Temple 3
Western Ontario3

Here is rank order listing of “best” programs in terms of which program produced the most faculty teaching/researching currently in clinical psych PhD programs and how many faculty these programs produced:
UCLA 19
Wisconsin14
Pitt12
Illinois 12
Minnesota 11
Florida State 10
stony brook 9
Texas 9

Average number of PhDs who are now teaching/researching who earned PhDs from these 35 schools = 3.2 (SD=3.2) with average year PhD conferred 2001. Rank Order Correlation between USNews list and my list of # trained = .61.

Ie, where did the current Profs at clinical psych programs earn their PhD? Which clinical psych schools did they attend and get their training?
I was curious, so I searched the top 30 US and 5 Canadian clinical psych PhD programs to see where faculty earned their PhD. Gives some insight of “best”