Who's a tough bitch taking care of herself a week after getting a new orifice carved into her? That's right, it's me!

Tweet by Martina Navratilova. "Predator. That is how he should register. A sexual predator…" quote-tweeting a tweet by "Biology Rules OK" about Dr. Beth Upton, a trans woman

This tweet is highly defamatory and Martina Navratilova should be fired from BBC Sport for it.

It demonstrates an horrendous level of hatred for a trans woman (who was cleared of all wrongdoing in a recent tribunal) because she is a trans woman.

It's kind of the inevitable end result of capitalism.

You won the Cold War, sir. Modern Russia is your prize.

It sucks a lot following the collapse of the USSR when capitalism took over under Yeltsin and he privatized everything, turning Russia into a capitalist dream.

The vast majority of which is publicly funded, a core facet of capitalism. 🤪

No it hasn't.

If anyone was wondering how e.g. the national equality body came to be ram-packed with wingnut ideologues or how various regulatory henhouses came to be guarded by industry-insider foxes: we’re getting the speedrun version here, with a charity body. I imagine Stonewall will be fully pod-personed.

In laying in bed at this temporary apartment that I'm in after discharge, since I live so far from the hospital, and I'm noticing this bizarre pressure on the inside of both my thighs that is almost familiar but distinctly different, so I reached down to check and found out that my thighs touch now.

Peter Thiel. Bill Gates. Bill Clinton. There's three.

They're already overturning those rights, sweetheart. They found the way: selling trans panic to liberals through the vehicle of "fairness in sports"

I don't think you know what a straw man argument is. Much less any of the other stuff.

State and local level wins are irrelevant in national elections, and I hate her for a ton of the things she did in those roles.

Did I argue that she was the worst candidate?

Are democrats taking money from people who collaborated with Epstein?

No. They don't. They have endless control even if they're the minority in Congress. Democrats only ever write legislation to appeal to them.

Did i say that I hate Walz?

No. Those aren't the individuals who did that. They're the ones who funded the military under an incoming fascist by sacrificing trans kids' Healthcare needs.

Her positions were under her control. She could have easily promised to rein Israel in, and she denied the genocide.

Insiders to her campaign reported that they knew she was losing because of Gaza.

Ok, and what's he doing right now? Is he still out there championing our rights or what? That's all stuff from before Trump.

What picture, specifically? I have no idea what you're referring to.

And to control the federal government you need to win in the electoral college on top of winning 60 of the Senate seats.

Why? Because I understand the coercive power of poverty and capitalism, and the fundamental nature of the governments as they've been set up in the US and the constituent states? Only a bot could have that knowledge.

How does the GOP stifle all their plans? Fucking start with that. There's endless procedural bullshit they could do. The fucking CIA wrote a goddamn manual on it.

And we DO rally around the INDIVIDUALS who seek to protect us.

You're arguing for loyalty to a PARTY, the leaders of which have actually campaigned on the inclusion of people who actively oppose human rights issues. They fought to put Henry Cuellar in power instead of a progressive woman. Even now, they're not actually opposing any of the shit Trump is doing.

Nobody wants to write off the entire party. We're just not buying your sale for voting blue no matter who.

land, manufacturing facilities, the media and natural resources... there's nothing really Democratic about this fucking place. Even the blue states. You can tell because it's still standard to put trans women in men's prison to be rape toys even in blue states. You have to litigate to move.

That's nonsense, because they've spent centuries securing that power undemocratically. Gerrymandering, the electoral college, the senate, limits on the number of seats in the House of Representatives, private enterprise as necessary sponsors to politicians and their parties, private ownership of

Remember: these people believe this, believe that it's natural and good, and actively support systems that reinforce this kind of bullshit

This is the future liberals want.

Because it costs thousands if not millions of dollars to run and we're up against two Epstein associate billionaire funded parties.

If that was true, they would have released the post mortem on her campaign that they did.

Movements in Minnesota made Walz look really good then. He's become a centrist asshole since.