Thrilled to have this paper out in the world. We can't restore democracy without restoring faith in its ability to deliver for people. Public options are part of the toolkit we need to do that.
Posts by Todd Tucker
Congrats to @quinnslobodian.com and @bentarnoff.com on the publication of Muskism. Exciting to see this out in the world and be an FT Best Book of the Week.
www.ft.com/content/3394...
#LifeGoals
Macron: “When we’re serious, we don’t say the opposite of what we said the day before every day, and maybe one shouldn’t speak every day."
www.nytimes.com/2026/04/02/w...
To this point: the justification for the tariffs was the National Trade Estimate report, which is chock full of Chamber of Commerce deregulatory asks. Coalition for New Trade goes into it here: static1.squarespace.com/static/69b18...
If the era of neoliberalism and distrust in government is to end, then what comes next?
Government has to shape markets to foster democracy. Read the full report by @suzmkahn.bsky.social to see how we build a stable, equitable future. 🔗
Tomorrow marks one year since this administration’s tariff frenzy began.
What started with declaring trade “emergencies” culminated in the Supreme Court striking down the tariffs as unconstitutional.
All the while, families paid the price and manufacturers got no real path to reshoring jobs ⬇️
Typo in the second item in the thread: the second "Canada" should be "China."
Trump won't be around forever. We need to have a conversation about what kind of trade policy and administrative state we want left at the end of all of this.
From way back in 2024, here are some ideas. END
rooseveltinstitute.org/publications...
Now, we see an unfortunate pattern developing, whereby Trump uses FDR legacy authority for short-termist ends, and gets sued by liberals pursuing short-termist wins. This month, it was on energy and the Defense Production Act.
x.com/toddntucker/...
Ironically, Trump showed greater anger at SCOTUS over all of this than his predecessors had, even thought the Roberts Court had used the major questions doctrine primarily against progressive priorities. (See @shahrzadshams.bsky.social and me 👇.)
rooseveltinstitute.org/blog/trumps-...
So while little price relief came for American families (see @mikemadowitz.bsky.social 👇), the real consequences are for future governance. IEEPA once allowed flexible tools for novel emergencies. Climate would have been a big one. Now that avenue is gone.
rooseveltinstitute.org/blog/now-tha...
The Supreme Court handed down its decision in February 2026, striking down IEEPA tariffs in their entirety.
The consequences for Trump weren't huge. He had bog standard trade complaints and other statutes allow him to impose tariffs for those.
rooseveltinstitute.org/blog/scotus-...
The anti-regulatory "major questions" doctrine thus became the judicial vehicle for second-guessing the executive branch's tariffs, even though Congress knew it had delegated that power. (As explored in depth in the above 👆 brief.)
www.ft.com/content/0ede...
They found some takers for this argument in the courts, even though Nixon had used IEEPA's predecessor authority for 10% tariffs. And right-wing judges appeared worried that future progressive administrations might use IEEPA for carbon tariffs.
rooseveltinstitute.org/publications...
Almost immediately, there were lawsuits.
Libertarian legal advocacy groups found sympathetic plaintiffs and argued not just that the emergencies were not real, but that the underlying statute (IEEPA) didn't allow tariffs at all.
rooseveltinstitute.org/blog/constit...
This followed a mini-"liberation" two months earlier, when Trump announced high tariffs on Canada over a fentanyl emergency few believed to be caused by our Northern neighbor. (He also imposed tariffs on Mexico and Canada, more plausibly the cause.)
rooseveltinstitute.org/publications...
Tomorrow marks the one-year anniversary of "Liberation Day" - Trump's on-again, off-again tariff frenzy.
Here's a recap 🧵.
First, there was this infamous chart👇, which declared that trade surplus and deficit countries alike constituted an emergency.
rooseveltinstitute.org/publications...
"Bomb this country? Trump effed around, and we’re all finding out."
Daniel Immerwahr on Trump's turn to regime change nihilism.
www.newyorker.com/magazine/202...
Trump continues the hate fest on SCOTUS, saying he is sickened by Gorsuch and Barrett over IEEPA ruling, and faults them for not allowing the government to keep revenue it had already collected.
www.cnbc.com/2026/03/26/t...
Definitely a good time to be leaning into policies to support clean energy production/alternatives to the global oil market...
This is from the DPA: "to the maximum extent possible, domestic energy supplies should be augmented through reliance on renewable energy sources (including solar, geothermal, wind, and biomass sources), more efficient energy storage and distribution technologies, and energy conservation measures"
Perhaps of interest to @himself.bsky.social @danielagabor.bsky.social @busbyj2.bsky.social @mbazilian.bsky.social @greenprofgreen.bsky.social @profdavidhart.bsky.social @thiggins.bsky.social @evergreenaction.bsky.social
Trump is using DPA to preempt California environmental regulations, but the same tool could be used to preempt anti-union laws or local permitting snags, as we showed in earlier work with Joel Michaels & @lenorepalladino.bsky.social.
rooseveltinstitute.org/publications...
NEW from me and @joeldodge07.bsky.social for @rooseveltinstitute.org / Vanderbilt Policy Accelerator: Trump is using the Defense Production Act to promote fossil fuel of a major donor. We show how it could instead be used to promote clean energy Abundance.
rooseveltinstitute.org/publications...
IEA: "More oil has been lost than during the twin shocks of the 1970s that triggered recessions and fuel rationing around the world."
The Iran War is "the greatest global energy security threat in history."
www.ft.com/content/0952...
This policy simultaneously is: 1) a taxpayer funded corporate handout for nothing in return; 2) actively damaging to our national security; and 3) worsening energy affordability in the middle of a self-inflicted energy shock.
So. Much. Winning.
www.nytimes.com/2026/03/17/c...
US to propose a formal bilateral mechanism of managed trade: the US-China Board of Trade.
www.nytimes.com/2026/03/16/u...
Grammys politics >> Oscars politics
As policymakers debate the future of the USMCA—the pact that replaced NAFTA—the stakes are still very real.
The upcoming review is a chance to rethink how North American trade works for workers and communities.
Read our Trade Director @toddntucker.com on the auto sector and what needs to change:
The paper will have particular importance over the next few months, as policymakers decide whether to renew or seek changes to the USMCA, which replaced NAFTA.
Susan Helper and I wrote about challenges in the auto sector for @brookings.edu last week.
www.brookings.edu/articles/cha...