Michael J. Pollard was ador(k)able ๐
Posts by Jeremy Cavaterra
In my limited experience with social media, attempts to share ideas in the hope of exchange results in close to zero response/engagement.
And this uncle is not having it. That idiotic bitch can go fuck off to hell.
Mary Morgan, whoever she is, can go fuck off right to hell. What an absolutely vile cunt.
480%
Yeah that's the part that seems a bit sus
What an abject timeline this is, when remarkable advances in technology are wasted on childish nonsense.
A few good painters and thespians.
๐ฉ
Alas, I cannot confirm this in either case
Loved it as a kid even though it was objectively terrible ๐
Fictitious & Symbolic Creatures in Art with Special Reference to Their Use in British Heraldry, by John Vinycomb (1906).
Nonsensical comment. Apply the same logic to any criticism you have of any political candidate and you'll see how idiotic it is. Take care.
Complete bullshit. Ossoff has hauled $81,165,841 in small individual contributions. He does not ALSO need $1,096,742 from Google, $312,392 from Amazon, $986,915 in PAC money, etc. Which "favors" has he promised them? He needs to put his money where his mouth is, literally. Stop the bullshit.
It is possible to endorse and vote for a candidate while ALSO holding him accountable for his bullshit. And Ossoff bloviating about politicians taking bribes while ALSO doing the same thing himself is BULLSHIT. That has nothing to do with a "purity test" and progressives will call him out for it.
He's always been a sack of shit.
Unsurprised.
Loam Neeson, the actor's lesser-known gardener brother.
?
Do you have a point to make? Or do you just enjoy being an attention-seeking gadfly?
It's possible to support the best candidate while ALSO holding him accountable for bullshit. Making a public spiel about politicians taking money while taking money from META, Google, Amazon, et al. is BULLSHIT. He needs to be called on the carpet and explain himself. And he needs to fucking STOP.
And all the other corporate/big tech money he receives? There is still a hulking elephant in the room with us that a lot of people pretend not to see.
Well now you're just being obtuse on purpose. Get lost.
If that's true, he changed his tune as a political expendiency because he sees which way the wind is blowing. But it's not only AIPAC, it's META, Google, Amazon, et al. He's up there talking about bought-and-paid-for politicians while being one himself. That's the point.
Mind your Swiss business. Go work on a cuckoo clock or something. Not interested in your little pissing contest, get lost.
No idea what your point is. Did you actually have something ot say? If not then get lost, you're part of the problem.