Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by James Gore

Post image

Well I guess I should provide a pic of my Data Protection Cat... here's Trumpet, investigating a data breach involving Dreamies... #DPPC2025 #petsofdppc

6 months ago 4 0 0 0

Well in my own small way I'm trying. Not least by bunging it on here.

10 months ago 1 0 1 0

I think finding out that £x of my Council Tax money was spent addressing pointless performative nonsense like this is a decent start in that exposure.

The thread above is making clear that it IS pointless.

10 months ago 1 0 1 0

True, but it's important to highlight this I think.

Ironically, the amount of time (and therefore council money) spent by officers providing redacted versions of information that Reform councillors already have access to can be quantified and requested via FOI....

10 months ago 1 0 1 0

So the question is why aren't the people who were elected to scrutinise the council - councillors - doing the scrutinising? That's demonstrably their job? Outsourcing that to a "DOGE" body is ludicrous.

10 months ago 1 0 1 0

It is actively wasting public money to introduce a pointless, unelected third party into the equation. That third party will be entitled to less information, and will get it more slowly. No council motion can override/break UK Law and change this.

10 months ago 0 0 1 0
Post image

Councillors ARE PART OF the council. They were elected as such. They are therefore entitled to see all kinds of information necessary for them to discharge their duties. Again, this is in the constitution.

10 months ago 0 0 1 0

The "DOGE" body will result in council officers spending pointless time and effort collating, redacting and applying legal exemptions/exceptions to information that is already available to elected councillors but cannot be legally released otherwise.

10 months ago 0 0 1 0

The above section confirms that Members have access to information that would otherwise be considered "confidential" and non-disclosable in the event of an FOI/EIR request by an external body. They simply need to ask officers for it.

10 months ago 0 0 1 0
Advertisement
Post image

The letter sent by Farage and others to Kent County Council ignores that Reform councillors ALREADY have access to MORE information than would be disclosable to a third party "DOGE" body, it is literally enshrined in the council constitution.
#Kent #ReformUK #DOGE #KCC

10 months ago 1 0 1 0

Politicians sacked for gobbing off on Whatsapp and Rangers losing to Queens Park.
Tremendously retro feel to this week already.

1 year ago 1 0 0 0
Post image

Yeah, perhaps AI isn't quite ready yet...

1 year ago 1 0 0 0
Post image

Far be it from me to blow my own trumpet....

1 year ago 1 0 0 0

Hey - thank you for that, much appreciated.

1 year ago 0 0 0 0

GDPR accounts (and those generally concerned with data protection) are what I'm after, but I seem to be in the vanguard. Be interested if anyone can recommend any.

1 year ago 1 0 1 0