Did he film this at valentines park walled garden? Makes me mad that that evil cunt is somewhere I really liked hanging out when I lived in Ilford.

If you can't be bothered doing alt text properly then don't bother

I made a $20 donation to SPLC, from the UK, and since then they spent many times that sending me POSTAL MAILOUTS TO THE UK asking for more money. What a fucking waste

BLUESKY DEVS STOP VIBE CODING YOU ABSOLUTE LOSERS

The problem IS the man

Adam F Kaos LP, I have the CD but it's buried somewhere

This isn't 4D chess, these people are venal and think you are stupid. To be honest, if you cannot see that this was an obvious quid pro quo situation wherein Mandy was given a plum job for services rendered, you are, in fact, a bit of a rube.

Is there anybody left for the Labour Party to tell to fuck off? It won't be a surprise when nobody votes for them next month.

It happened with Rishi Sunak. It happened with Priti Patel. It happened with Suella Braverman. Fuck, if only we could look at some kind of history of colonialism that involved establishing an ethnic middle class in South Asia that then got exported to Africa and returned to the imperial core...

This question about whether Mandelson posed a security risk is totally moot. Surely it is itself evident, going on his past record, that appointing him posed huge reputation and national security risks. What's going on today is massive muddying of the water, nothing else.

In all of this i take Starmer, mandelson and Labour Together to be co conspirators. It's all the same, mcsweeney acting on behalf of Starmer as his cabinet Office chief in this instance.

Well i mean you're right in so far as its moot because they are all lying scum, but what hurts is that it's Labour together that caused this disaster premiership. Thus it would be sweet to see mandelsons reward for his work getting Starmer in be the thing that takes the PM down

Mcsweeney, surely? At what point was Jones appointed? He was part of a Starmer relaunch after a few months if I remember correctly, not there from the start.

Starmer will fall on the elections and not this

It's so obvious that the appointment was rammed through for political reasons, vetting be damned. The Westminster lobby has no problem with this because it was the reward for seeing off Corbyn. As we can't possibly acknowledge that I think whatever is said today won't see the truth out.

When they say the Cabinet took the view that Mandelson did not need vetting, evidently they mean McSweeney

I mean this is very obviously what happened. Robbins had absolutely no reason to fiddle it so Mandelson could take the job, other than instruction from his boss.

"I want to see him broken as a man"

It's almost like Starmer was somehow beholden to mandelson

Making a post and then discarding it as "potentially treasonous"

Starmer, Mandelson and Vetting Having just watched several of hours of Keir Starmer responding to questions to his House of Commons statement on the report in the Guardian that Peter Mandelson actually failed security vetting I …

After watching Keir Starmer give his statement to the Commons and take questions for two hours, I wrote this:

libegalfrat.wordpress.com/2026/04/20/s...

He's not perfect but he's asking the right question

I haven't heard a single churno ask "why did keir starmer not ask about the results of the vetting?", although some (Christina Patterson for example) have pre-emptively called the PM totally incurious, it doesn't get to the heart that mandelsons employment was on a "accept-at-all-costs" basis

Today's media mobilisation around the PM reeks of Operation Save Big Dog

Where does this "Wes Streeting is an effective communicator" thing come from? He has all the charisma of a central london nightclub doorman

Also there will be egg on face all around when it does come out that Starmer knew. It's fucking inconceivable that he didn't know.

How is is possible to be certain that Keir Starmer is in fact not a man of integrity? When Liz Kendall says that he is.

she's fucking useless

Some sad sack is on Stephen Nolan saying there is no evidence that downing St knew the outcome of the MI5 vetting. It's posts like this, that throw the "established facts"into sharp relief, that demonstrate why social media is so important and why the legacy media hate it so much.

Said to myself yesterday that this line that Starmer didn't know was both preposterous and frankly insulting. I'd expect nothing less from his office, all they know is how to lie, very incompetently.