Is Sarah upset because her experience has been that attacks on the leader must primarily come from the PLP, only target genuinely left wing people and any other attack is somehow illegitimate?

Maybe because we’re all told it’s “sixth form politics” or the politics of envy when we do. Largely by your employer.

45 years of propaganda shutting down valid criticism (especially in your employers paper) is hard to overcome.

It’s quite a humiliating spectacle.

The PM and local councillors are probably praying for some kind of miracle. The PLP are low key excited for a rout - doesn’t impact them, makes Starmer untenable.

Westicle is praying that hes fabricated enough distance from Mandy to have a chance. Mess.

How could someone who had to resign from government twice for corruption pass any level of vetting?

A Russian shill because I look at the reality that they can’t beat Ukraine so they aren’t a threat to Europe? Does being that stupid not hurt?

And I’m marked as rude for calling out centrists and fuckwits for the cunts they are.

Wonder which category you’re in.

And yet I dragged you around for your stupidity, with the only conclusion you were able to reach being that no matter what facts are presented, Russia will always be the threat because youre gullible and incapable of basic critical thinking.

No I think it’s basic education and not supporting double standards.

So if several allies are more corrupt, committing more war crimes, destabilising more countries, they should be compared on those realities, not the way you do, with a thumb on the scale.

And when you start to read past your bias, you’ll start to question why this narrative has been invented. Why did the media try to paint Epstein as a Russian spy when his links to Israel were clear? Why does Ukraine get headlines but others don’t? Why is sharia terrible in Iran but not Saudi?

I’m informed about Russia. The problem is that you know if you actually give specifics, I will be able to point to multiple “allies” doing much worse, and you can’t move past the base simplistic narrative that you’ve gullibly swallowed.

Try looking at what’s being done before who is doing it.

Creasy is a privileged middle class scumbag who does fuck all to help the working class, which she gets held to account for, and so her retort is to try to permanently position herself as a victim. This is not the first article in the same vein.

What exactly is the justification for this escalation?

But I don’t think we can ignore how complicit so many politicians have been with Israel’s ongoing campaign to destabilise and dominate the Middle East.

Bibi finally found the right one, but where were the others shouting about the attempts to corrupt them?

Where do I? This is what you uneducated fuckwits do all the time.

I’ve never supported Putin, just repeatedly said he isn’t a threat and you have been able to provide no counter evidence.

And you only support white Europeans and can’t form cogent arguments. Youre an even thicker Goodwin.

Oh, and if we’re talking about Hitler, your position sounds rather supportive.

Killing white Europeans is so much worse than anybody else isn’t it? Making Muslims the bad guys instead of Jews doesn’t really change the ideology.

Except they were - are you denying it? Syria was a basket case.

Face it, you’re a gullible cunt who thinks that someone being an “ally” dictates good or bad.

That’s fine - you’re just the same level as the standard reform voter. You can only understand geopolitics in comic book terms.

Except I didn’t. and the fact that you’re desperate to try and get a gotcha on me proves how devastated you are that your complete lack of education on Russia has been exposed.

Otherwise you’d be able to answer simple questions

Because you’re obsessed with Russia but still can’t actually articulate how they’re a threat.

And you talk about history like you have any understanding when you clearly don’t even have the rudimentary tools to understand history. Or current events evidently.

The key word is counter-factual.

Explain specifically what threat Russia are if they can’t get past Ukraine? And I mean specific. what are their next targets? How will they do it?

If you’re going to repeat spurious baseless assertions, just go to the mirror and see a thick arsehole instead.

I have an east v west mentality when you’re some fuckwit who still thinks Russia is this massive threat except it’s just based on spurious assertions?

Guess you feel much more solidarity with the people of Ukraine than people in the Middle East or Asia or Africa, right? Wonder why.

No, it really isn’t.

But even if it was, you’re just showing how ignorant you are.

Do you genuinely not understand that if a military simply doesn’t have the capability to expand, they’re not a threat? Bewildering that someone can be so incapable of basic logic.

I’m saying that in a situation where the leader of a country, no matter how abhorrent they are or how deranged their ambition is, if they have proven unequivocally that they are incapable of achieving it, they are not a threat.

If you don’t get that, it explains a lot.

Oh dear. He doesn’t need to be a communist - people as gullible and thick as you will shift the fear to something else. The Cold War is over. Russia aren’t a major threat.

You believe differently because you are uneducated and incapable of basic reason.

Well the west were supporting al-qaeda in Syria so I guess that says a lot.

Oh but it’s all dirty Russian money. What makes you think they’re the only ones doing that? Ignorance again? Does the west not prop up brutal regimes?

and I’m still not going to bat for anyone - just pointing out facts.

Except it’s a meaningless term that you’re using to try and make Russia sound like the big bad wolf because on actual evidence, they aren’t.

And you’re too stupid and arrogant to admit that you blindly follow hyperbole without any critical thinking.

What are you cherrypicking next?

If he was incapable of expanding then how likely is it that he’s a big threat?

If someone can’t get past their own borders, how are they a threat to anywhere else? Why was Franco never stopped?

Are you capable of reason or just Cold War red scare?

I would say we shouldn’t intervene unless essential. And I would say that we should prioritise the threats based on actual evidence.

You can’t agree because that would mean that Israel, the US, saudi etc would be a much bigger threat. but they’re “allies” right…

Ignorance is embarrassing.

No, Rome was a military empire because they had an empire and a robust military across that empire. Russia doesn’t really have an empire, nor does it have massive military power across it.

And oh look now the goalpost shifts to indigenous populations because you’ve lost yet another point.

Except I’m not defending Russia.

I’m just pointing out that if you take off your dumbcunt blinkers and look at the facts, you’ll see that Russia are not a major threat and you have scant basis for suggesting they are.

You say neocolonialism, how many regime changes have Russia instigated?

If Hitler had spent 4 years unable to take control of one small country, I’d be saying that he’s not really a threat, yes.

Because I’m not a fucking moron and I realise that in order to conquer more than one country, you have to be able to conquer the first one.

When they did a targeted attack against a double agent? Israel has deployed chemical weapons against civilians. Everything else you’ve said applies to a lot of countries, many of them much worse than Russia.

Youre just a gullible cretin stuck in Cold War ignorance.