Me too!
Posts by Chris Yogerst
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
The NYT described them well in 1944 as a studio that “combines good citizenship with good picturemaking.” Jack plastered that at the studio entrance 😀
Absolutely! I think that's where my WB fascination began.
Scorsese is the reason I became interested in WB in the first place. He's been the absolute greatest steward of movies and of Warners specifically.
Ouch! I mean, @sharonwaxman.bsky.social isn't wrong at all here. How can one person come into a company like WB and then leave with a mountain of money in just a few years. Just think if all that money was invested in movies.
This looks incredible! We talk about contemporary data all the time (we should) but I’ve felt a need to better understand how this dates back. Looks like the answer is here 👇
Eager to pick this up. I remember the previous release looked really rough. Excited for a proper 4K presentation. It's been ages since I dove into Lubitsch (who was brought to the USA by Jack and Harry Warner!).
A little delay getting this up but here's my thoughts on All the President's Men at 50. Such a killer film that really hasn't aged a day. It's a reminder of the importance of analysis and investigation, only more relevant in the digital age.
Big news leaning into a week where WBD votes on the Paramount deal that’s propped up by Gulf region funds www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
Haha glad I’m not the only one still hanging on 😁
Yesssss
Ooh good point. He claims soldiers were using the prayer (who no doubt likely knew the context) but if he made that up I could see him asking AI for something “badass from the Bible” and then enduing up with Tarantino 😁
Fun fact: I flew to LA last year and when I was renting my car the lady at the desk looked at my info and said “still using that Hotmail account, huh?” Yep…hanging on till the end!
This looks incredible! We talk about contemporary data all the time (we should) but I’ve felt a need to better understand how this dates back. Looks like the answer is here 👇
So much to cover on the Paramount/Warner front -- the Block the Merger list grows to over 3,000. David Ellison ducks the senate inquiry again. Mark Ruffalo blasts the deal as "oligarchic control," etc etc
Of course, in 2026, it's increasingly difficult to decipher what's real. Either we're all getting played or Hegseth got duped into buying a bogus Bible verse.
The best part is that an egocentric Christian Nationalist like Hegseth couldn't spot it for the delightful simulacrum that it is.
Of course, in 2026, it's increasingly difficult to decipher what's real. Either we're all getting played or Hegseth got duped into buying a bogus Bible verse.
The best part is that an egocentric Christian Nationalist like Hegseth couldn't spot it for the delightful simulacrum that it is.
Starts tonight!!!!
So much to cover on the Paramount/Warner front -- the Block the Merger list grows to over 3,000. David Ellison ducks the senate inquiry again. Mark Ruffalo blasts the deal as "oligarchic control," etc etc
Everything about this dude’s life is so crazy it may even be true.
“We do not have to watch ‘Citizen Kane’ or read ‘1984’ to understand that the concentrated oligarchic control this merger represents is a threat to free press, an informed populace and democracy itself,” Ruffalo said.
🔥🔥
Learn about the Warner Brothers from the guy who wrote the (very good) book on the brothers & their studio's impact on film history. Online class begins April 16th!
Yesssss! See ya there!
Same! The class will be loads of fun. There's a ton of great subjects available there and coming soon.
That said, I don't think they've had anyone cover Buster Keaton yet. Just sayin' :)
Yeah, strange. I didn't see that coming, either. Maybe that's why they aren't full MAGA despite the QAnon support a few years ago that they allowed Tim Ballard to separate from.
But, in 2026, who the hell knows.
Thanks so much for sharing. Your support means the world (and you've been a kind supporter from the start!!!)
Hope you've been well. I think I owe you a catch up email...