i shouldn’t have to say it, but if you are unsympathetic to “men” you will be unsympathetic to transfem eggs. This is just perpetuating the fucking patriarchy

I remember someone asking "why don't we have science fiction predicting this behavior from AI?" And the reason is because in fiction, this sort of behavior is already taken up by stories about demons. It's a demon simulator.

You know when I first encountered generative AI, I described it as laundering copyright infringement, but now I feel it can best be described as an all-purpose fraud machine. The syncophancy is a part of its con. Calling it a demon is just calling something that quacks like a duck a duck here.

It seems more like if you could drive your car into a crowd via ideomotor effect rather than conscious effort. I don't think the people who are syncophanted into delusions were trying to become psychotic.

The most fascinating article on AI I read was on some people were using it as a third person to triangulate their spouses, because the AI was always available and always agreed with the user, and fluidly came up with reasons the spouse was terrible every time.

If that's not a demon, it's close.

something you almost remember #whaspoilers

I never really considered space aliens as marginalized but getting locked up in Area 51 and dissected by the government is absolutely a consequence of marginalization.

Wow that was a journey. This is my favorite part I think:

Is this like the guy who thought the pyramids were grain silos.

Rage overtaking sense for a moment, it takes some special chutzpah to call Jews "Baal worshippers" in the context of smashing a statue of your preferred deity

Do you hear yourselves

Normalcy bias is gonna kill us all

So a transmasc who prioritizes his maleness, wants to be stealth and fit in, does not even have an obvious place in community at all. Ones who prioritize queerness do not feel, or are not allowed to, organize by the lines of their masculinity, and are coerced into being hangers-on of other spaces.

But moreover, queerness is, broadly, feminized. Looking at so many intracommunith squabbles it feels like most transmascs feel like they have to choose between queerness and masculinity, because the way our society is set up, queerness is antimasculine in a way it is not antifeminine.

not to mention being heavily indoctrinated with "all men are dangerous" means wondering, am I dangerous? Is he dangerous? Are they dangerous? Etc.

Tbh I feel like I have been ejected from ALL community when I came out, and also, like, I do think a significant amount of fragmentation is political. It feels like if you're not the right kind of transmasc you're worse than an actual enemy and what the "bad kind" is, there is little consensus

The sort of stuff trans people are forced to endure daily tbh

That the same people angry about destroying a statue are supporting Graham "I support defiling corpses during wartime" Platner for fucking senator is making me legit insane.

honestly think most men of that era who didn't want their wives to work white collar jobs were motivated more by "i work there and we are actively predatory towards women" than some sort of RETVRN-style mindset of idealized values

Feminism is the radical notion that men are people

Lmao

AMIA bombing - Wikipedia

Bruh en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMIA_bo...

in the early days of the net websites used to have messages like "welcome to my amazing webzone, i hope you enjoy the things i've collected that represent my strange mind." now they're just like "by clicking this box you agree to recieve targeted advertisements in your dreams"

Okay okay I GUESS if war crimes were a thing in this universe, making the equivalent of "heat metal" an area of affect spell would probably be a war crime. But also consider: it was an angel and angels aren't people. Any transgressions against angels are between me and God, not The Hague.

Was playing pathfinder last night and apparently boiling an enemy alive when they try to hide in a body of water means I am using my powers for "war crimes" smdh

and also cis guys know when a guy is like, For Girls and instinctually feel uncomfortable with him bc he is like a sexual object viewed from a perspective that is not their own (like edward cullen for example) in the same way that a girl character made for male consumption is uncomfortable

"They're the same picture" meme with antisemitism and transphobia

Remember:

Also, "this tech kills the market for entry level jobs but doesn't make the need for people who were trained through the entry level jobs go away" is a clusterfuck for the industry.

HAPPY BELATED BIRTHDAY DEAR REIJEN!! ❤️✨️
I offer you a doodle I made in 2025

Sorry, putting them right after another seemed to imply a relation. I don't really disagree with that though when it comes to the way people talk on BlueSky with a character limit expecially it seems like splitting hairs