We will host a South Asia APSA pre-conference at Harvard on Sept 2.
If you would like to present a paper, serve as a discussant, or only attend the workshop or happy hour, please submit your info by March 15 (extended deadline):
forms.gle/ZDau8Jm86kJt...
Feel free to circulate widely!
Working paper available here: poverty-action.org/sites/defaul...
Thank you to the IPA (@poverty-action.bsky.social) for funding and featuring our research.
poverty-action.org/how-does-coe...
🚨NEW WORKING PAPER🚨 Why are many Latino immigrants *not* naturalizing, learning English, and participating in American politics? We provide new theory and evidence across 3 surveys and an instrumental variables approach to show how migration motives shape immigrant integration. tinyurl.com/3expvu8e
Curious for your thoughts!
Thanks Vicente!
Thanks so much, Hakeem!
When groups perceive persistent devaluation — whether they are minorities facing discriminatory institutions or dominant groups facing status loss — demands for recognition, respect and dignity can outweigh material considerations.
Evidence from 100+ interviews dovetails with the experimental and descriptive findings and echoes aspects of work outside Pakistan: Hall, @noamgidron.bsky.social and @pavisuri.bsky.social on status concerns, Nyron Crawford on the “racial defense,” and Jeffrey Witsoe on lower-caste politics.
Lower-class group members are more likely to face such discrimination and suffer quotidian humiliation from non-coethnic street-level bureaucrats. The empirical evidence supports this reading rather than alternatives centered on clientelism, social networks, or occupational prestige.
The core concept I develop is defiant pride: when state institutions discriminate against a group, more exposed members double down on their identity as a psychological defense mechanism. This manifests as ethnicity becoming a larger part of the self-concept, which shapes preferences and beliefs.
But not all voters value dignity equally: using an identity allocation measure, I show that high ethnic identifiers are more likely to seek recognition and forgive malfeasance. Why do some voters become so attached to their ethnic identities? And why are they more often from lower social classes?
I show through a preregistered experiment that a non-coethnic politician must perform better on material dimensions to match the support a coethnic gains by simply emphasizing dignity concerns. This lowered performance threshold is the “slack” descriptive representatives receive.
Many voters aren’t trading their vote for goods or patronage. They’re seeking recognition in a political system that routinely devalues them, but this demand for dignity can weaken accountability. The paper presents experimental, qualitative, and descriptive evidence in support of this claim.
New paper in @ajpseditor.bsky.social. Is descriptive representation good for substantive representation? Why do voters stay loyal to corrupt and poorly governing ethnic parties? I argue that we ought to focus less on patronage and more on dignity concerns. Defiant pride can come at a price. 1/🧵
Congratulations!
Please circulate!
@wpmarble
and I are looking for a part-time RA to help with various data tasks. This is a remote-work position that is ideal for recent graduates who are considering applying for a social science PhD. Apply here: forms.gle/EN3JLUiNm8m4...
Bluesky needs to allow bookmarking!
@rahsaanmax.bsky.social just pointed this post out to me. Thanks for engaging! I consider how the theory travels to the case you mention in the book project, and I don't think the application is a stretch (at all :))
Would love to be added thanks :)
Since so many more people have joined, just a reminder that @fortunato.bsky.social and I are recruiting a two-year postdoc for our project on legislative capacity. Come to beautiful Copenhagen and work on a fun project. PSJMinfo
Love this for past you
Read Master and Margarita earlier this year and adored it.
