Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Robert Hubbell

Preview
Schrodinger’s Strait April 18, 2026

Via @rbhubbell.bsky.social - Schrodinger’s Strait open.substack.com/pub/roberthu...

2 days ago 30 5 0 1
Preview
As another disaster is averted, let’s take a breath . . . and then prepare for the next battle. April 8, 2026

It was a great honor and a total blast to chat with @rbhubbell.bsky.social for his Today's Edition newsletter about our campaign in MA-08! Check out the video of our whole conversation in (appropriately) today's edition!

roberthubbell.substack.com/p/as-another...

1 week ago 9 2 0 0
Preview
As another disaster is averted, let’s take a breath . . . and then prepare for the next battle. April 8, 2026

"Take a breath . . . and then prepare for the next battle. Ours must not be the generation that falters in preserving the flame of democracy for the next generation.

Stay strong"! open.substack.com/pub/roberthu...

1 week ago 22 9 0 0
Preview
Trump is unfit for office. He should be removed ASAP. April 6, 2026

"It is difficult to endure Trump’s ugly rhetoric. The antidote is to be the best Americans and global citizens we can be, in the hope that the rest of the world sees us and knows we represent America".
Follow @rbhubbell.bsky.social if you aren't doing so already.

open.substack.com/pub/roberthu...

2 weeks ago 25 12 1 0

You are correct. The authority cited in the executive order for paying TSA is a statute that prohibits using funds for any purpose other than that specified in the appropriations bill. Trump is violating the Antideficiency Act.

2 weeks ago 21 1 0 0
Preview
Trump reminds us why we are rallying on Saturday March 27, 2026

I discussed this issue at greater length in my Today’s Edition newsletter dated 3/27/26, "Trump reminds us why we are rallying on Saturday," bit.ly/4sGvfRY

3 weeks ago 12 1 0 0

The Antideficiency Act, 31 U.S.C. § 1341(a)(1), says no person may “make or authorize an expenditure or obligation exceeding an amount available in an appropriation or fund for the expenditure or obligation.” It is a felony to willfully spend money not appropriated by Congress. 31 USC 1350.

3 weeks ago 14 2 1 0
Advertisement

The only legal authority cited in the memo, 31 USC 1301(a), contains a PROHIBITION on using funds. It reads, in part, “Appropriations shall be applied ONLY to the objects for which the appropriations were made.”

3 weeks ago 2 0 1 0
Preview
Paying Our Great Transportation Security Administration Officers and Employees MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY THE DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET SUBJECT:       Paying

Trump's “presidential memo” [not an executive order] to pay TSA is here: bit.ly/4vbrDZU. It authorizes DHS head Markwayne Mullin to use funds with "a reasonable and logical nexus to TSA operations." That test is a legal fiction for which Trump offers no authority.

3 weeks ago 19 5 2 2

As always, Josh Marshall has the best analysis of this mess.

In a just world, he would be the editor of the NYT or the WP.

He and his team do fantastic invaluable work and deserve your support.

3 weeks ago 225 42 5 2
Preview
The Bad News Echo-Chamber of Pro-Democracy Substack Or, who talks to whom about what. How many pro-democracy Substack authors over-focus on gloom and doom and ignore organizing, and who's bucking that trend.

@rbhubbell.bsky.social referred to this analysis in Today's Edition.  It is spot on and led me to unsubscribe from several substacks that I had pretty much stopped reading because their repetitive messaging was more doom and gloom than I need in any day. 
open.substack.com/pub/theconne...

4 weeks ago 11 7 0 0
When it comes to the impact of #MeToo, it’s important first of all to recognise that it was not a deus ex machina event out of nothing and nowhere. It was a consequence of the preceding five years of feminist upheaval, which in turn built on earlier feminist work. That upheaval took place as a vast public discourse educating the public about the pervasiveness of gender violence and the fact that it very often does not unfold as “stranger in alley attacks pure young lady”. It got people to let go of a lot of the stereotypes and slanders that protected rapists by blaming victims or portraying them as incapable of bearing trustworthy witness to their experience. It created the editorial willingness to publish stories that exposed movie producer/convicted rapist Harvey Weinstein and a host of other abusers and creeps and unpacked the mechanisms of protection they employed.

That in turn resulted in changed laws. Six years after that 2017 upheaval, two women said, in a talk at the Practising Law Institute, “Prior to #MeToo, only three states had passed anti-harassment reforms.” They counted 70 workplace anti-harassment laws passed, in 40 US states and 3,000 pieces of legislation introduced overall that were impacted by #MeToo. A nationwide law passed in 2021 ended forced arbitration of sexual assault and harassment, giving victims the right to go to court. All this legislation created a lot more accountability and victim protection, but it’s the kind of consequence that often goes unnoticed. Unnoticed because it’s complicated, slow, incremental and, for the most part, legislative reform is not a hot headline.

The eager obituary writers tended to announce that #MeToo had failed whenever further incidents of high-profile sexual abuse were reported (though the very fact they were reported and in some cases successfully prosecuted may have been a result of these shifts). The single most important impact of #MeToo, I believe, is akin to what many environmental victories look…

When it comes to the impact of #MeToo, it’s important first of all to recognise that it was not a deus ex machina event out of nothing and nowhere. It was a consequence of the preceding five years of feminist upheaval, which in turn built on earlier feminist work. That upheaval took place as a vast public discourse educating the public about the pervasiveness of gender violence and the fact that it very often does not unfold as “stranger in alley attacks pure young lady”. It got people to let go of a lot of the stereotypes and slanders that protected rapists by blaming victims or portraying them as incapable of bearing trustworthy witness to their experience. It created the editorial willingness to publish stories that exposed movie producer/convicted rapist Harvey Weinstein and a host of other abusers and creeps and unpacked the mechanisms of protection they employed. That in turn resulted in changed laws. Six years after that 2017 upheaval, two women said, in a talk at the Practising Law Institute, “Prior to #MeToo, only three states had passed anti-harassment reforms.” They counted 70 workplace anti-harassment laws passed, in 40 US states and 3,000 pieces of legislation introduced overall that were impacted by #MeToo. A nationwide law passed in 2021 ended forced arbitration of sexual assault and harassment, giving victims the right to go to court. All this legislation created a lot more accountability and victim protection, but it’s the kind of consequence that often goes unnoticed. Unnoticed because it’s complicated, slow, incremental and, for the most part, legislative reform is not a hot headline. The eager obituary writers tended to announce that #MeToo had failed whenever further incidents of high-profile sexual abuse were reported (though the very fact they were reported and in some cases successfully prosecuted may have been a result of these shifts). The single most important impact of #MeToo, I believe, is akin to what many environmental victories look…

"It’s naively defeatist to assume millennia of patriarchy entrenched in law, culture, social arrangements and economics could be or should have been fully disassembled in one lifetime."

1 month ago 171 37 2 1

Palintir’s board of directors needs to stage an intervention before Karp gives another interview. Talk about supply chain risk . . . That was scary.

1 month ago 71 0 5 0

That’s not all I said. Check out the newsletter.

1 month ago 1 0 2 0
Advertisement
Preview
Trump CANNOT regulate elections by executive order February 27, 2026

Trump cannot make, change, or repeal laws by executive order. Therefore, he cannot ban mail ballots or require proof of citizenship by executive order. True, he can try, but courts can, will, and have invalidated Trump’s efforts to regulate federal elections by executive order.

bit.ly/3MKhZfp

1 month ago 74 29 1 2

The Court reached the right result for the right reasons. It moved expeditiously. Three conservative justices applied the Major Questions Doctrine as a direct limit on presidential claims of delegated authority. The Court is not a reliable ally, but last Friday, it did the right thing.

1 month ago 19 4 1 0
Preview
Let’s take the win on tariffs. February 23, 2026

Some commentators claimed the tariff decision was an illusory victory, a victory for big business, or that conservative justices would not apply the same rationale against Trump if he attempts to assert presidential power over federal elections.

We need to learn how to take a win.

bit.ly/4aGSd3r

1 month ago 40 13 2 2

The seven opinions by nine justices are unnecessarily complicated, but at root, the majority agreed that the Constitution means what it says (Congress has the authority to impose duties and taxes) and that a statute that does not mention tariffs does not authorize the president to impose tariffs.

2 months ago 21 6 0 0
Preview
A good day for democracy! February 21, 2026

Good news to start our weekend! The Supreme Court invalidated Trump’s illegal tariffs in an opinion that reasserts the separation of powers, the primacy of the Constitution, and the role of Congress in making law. Clear-cut victories are rare; we should celebrate!

bit.ly/3MHGKsz

2 months ago 52 16 2 2

But Trump cannot abide anyone getting attention that could be diverted to him. On Thursday, Trump gave a speech that was a frat-boy special: He asked his friends to “hold my beer” while he showed them how to dive from a third-floor balcony into the shallow end of a swimming pool. He flopped. Bigly.

2 months ago 23 5 0 0
Preview
Trump tells Cabinet members on the campaign trail, “Hold my beer . . .” February 20, 2026

Democrats are gleeful over the prospect of billionaires, creeps, and white supremacist Cabinet members explaining to voters why Trump’s Ponzi-scheme-RICO-enterprise administration is helping Americans who are struggling to buy groceries, as they fear that AI will replace their jobs.

bit.ly/4kL4bxu

2 months ago 36 16 4 3
Advertisement

One of their brilliant ideas is to dispatch members of Trump’s cabinet to key congressional districts to defend the administration’s handling of the economy, immigration, healthcare, and the Epstein files.

We can only hope that the administration follows through on this monumentally bad idea.

2 months ago 31 6 0 0
Preview
Please, oh please(!), send Cabinet secretaries to swing districts to campaign for Republicans in 2026! February 19, 2026

Trump’s handlers know that a blue wave is swelling in the distance, timed to crash on the Republican Party on November 3, 2026. In panic mode, they are “spitballing” ideas to convince voters that things aren’t as bad as they seem.

bit.ly/4kGIy1q

2 months ago 35 15 1 1
Preview
We are being called to make a choice. We can speak or we can remain silent. February 18, 2026

bit.ly/3MP2UsP

2 months ago 33 15 1 1

A brilliant piece that everyone should read. Ignore the sniping in the comments about who showed up first / was right all along. Buckle is right: Millions of Americans raised the alarm and were dismissed and ignored. No more. Stop fighting old battles and confront the one that matters: Trump.

2 months ago 6 2 1 0
Preview
What’s Behind the Centrists’ Resistance to the “Resistance Liberals”? They’re acknowledging now that the people who called Trump a “fascist” were right. But somehow we’re still not to be trusted.

if centrists admit resit libs were right, they should stop dismissing & disparaging us

my latest for @newrepublic.com

newrepublic.com/article/2060...

2 months ago 126 43 10 10

I hope that Anderson Cooper will explain why he really left CBS--which appears to be for the right reasons. But slinking out "to spend more time with my kids" fails to meet the moment. Otherwise, he will be remembered as the Susan Collins of Journalism. All of the concern, none of the conviction.

2 months ago 3 1 0 0

Don’t be Anderson Cooper. Don’t make up excuses for doing the right thing. Like Anderson Cooper, we are being called to choose where we stand in the defense of American democracy. Be proud to tell your children how you came to the defense of your country. That requires us to speak the truth.

2 months ago 57 16 0 0
Advertisement
Post image

Anderson Cooper quit CBS’s 60 Minutes with a gracious note explaining that he wanted to spend more time with his kids—when we all know he quit because he could not abide the editorial control over 60 Minutes by Trump's financial backers and Bari Weiss.

bit.ly/46RYyb6

2 months ago 38 13 1 0
Preview
President’s Day 2026: An inflection point for democracy. February 16, 2026

On President’s Day 2026, we have every reason to be hopeful, but no reason to be complacent. Trump is weak and unpopular. Pro-democracy forces are winning more than they are losing. That formula spells inevitable defeat for Trump and his MAGA agenda.

bit.ly/4rkGL4L

2 months ago 40 12 0 0