Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Ignacio Rebollo

Respiration as a dynamic modulator of sensory sampling Nature Communications - Breathing shapes perception: Inspiration upregulates arousal and excitability, sharpening sensitivity to visual signals. By aligning respiration with task timing, people...

Out now in @natcomms.nature.com, our latest from @bodybrainbehaviour.bsky.social: Visual perception, oscillatory excitability markers, and network connectivity are modulated by the breathing rhythm - depending on how much you know about the stimulus.

#brainbody #neuroskyence

1 week ago 45 17 0 1
Post image

New paper in Imaging Neuroscience by Zhishun Wang, Jack Grinband, et al:

MEPrep: A robust pipeline for multi-echo fMRI denoising and preprocessing

doi.org/10.1162/IMAG...

2 weeks ago 16 8 0 0

More importantly, do you use a fixed % rule, mean FD, or minimum clean duration remaining?

2 weeks ago 0 0 0 0

rs-fMRI methods question for the hive mind:
What’s your practical cutoff for excluding a whole resting-state run due to motion? Using FD > 0.3 mm as the threshold, at what % of contaminated frames do you usually drop the run?

2 weeks ago 1 1 1 0
Post image Post image Post image

🧵 I gave Claude two things: a short paper (doi.org/10.1073/pnas...) and a raw behavioural dataset with 3 lines of variable descriptions.

Then I asked it to fit three computational RL models described only by equations in the manuscript. No code, no toolbox, no guidance on the fitting procedure. 1/3

2 weeks ago 75 26 1 5
Post image

matlab is fun until you have to start paying for your lab’s licenses

3 weeks ago 3 0 1 0

Congratulations Leah what an unstoppable force!!!

3 weeks ago 8 0 1 0
  Graphical abstract showing three panels. Left panel, "Multiorgan Interoception Measures," depicts a translucent human body
   silhouette with anatomically rendered heart (red) and lungs (blue), accompanied by schematic icons for three
  psychophysical tasks: the Respiratory Resistance Sensitivity Task (RRST), Heart Rate Discrimination Task (HRDT), and an
  auditory control condition. N = 241 participants. Center panel, "Psychophysical Modelling and Individual Differences,"
  shows a fan of overlapping sigmoid psychometric curves in blue-to-red gradient representing individual variation in
  perceptual threshold (α) and precision (β), a hierarchical Bayesian model diagram, and icons for metacognitive bias and
  M-Ratio efficiency. Right panel, "Key Finding: No Cross-Modal Relationship," displays a scatterplot of cardiac versus
  respiratory sensitivity with a flat regression line (r ≈ 0, BF₀₁ > 6), a compact Bayes Factor heatmap with mostly blue
  null-supporting cells and one orange cell indicating that subjective confidence is shared across modalities (r = 0.51***).
   Takeaway: interoceptive ability is modality-specific.

Graphical abstract showing three panels. Left panel, "Multiorgan Interoception Measures," depicts a translucent human body silhouette with anatomically rendered heart (red) and lungs (blue), accompanied by schematic icons for three psychophysical tasks: the Respiratory Resistance Sensitivity Task (RRST), Heart Rate Discrimination Task (HRDT), and an auditory control condition. N = 241 participants. Center panel, "Psychophysical Modelling and Individual Differences," shows a fan of overlapping sigmoid psychometric curves in blue-to-red gradient representing individual variation in perceptual threshold (α) and precision (β), a hierarchical Bayesian model diagram, and icons for metacognitive bias and M-Ratio efficiency. Right panel, "Key Finding: No Cross-Modal Relationship," displays a scatterplot of cardiac versus respiratory sensitivity with a flat regression line (r ≈ 0, BF₀₁ > 6), a compact Bayes Factor heatmap with mostly blue null-supporting cells and one orange cell indicating that subjective confidence is shared across modalities (r = 0.51***). Takeaway: interoceptive ability is modality-specific.

Is there a single "interoceptive sense"? Our new study in
@commspsychol.nature.com says: probably not. In 241 participants, cardiac and respiratory interoception were completely uncorrelated — only subjective confidence was shared across domains. www.nature.com/articles/s44... #psychscisky 🧪

1 month ago 115 31 2 5

Incredibly excited to finally share this project! Most heartfelt thanks to everyone involved for their support 🫶🏻 Looking forward to much more gut-brain research to come!

1 month ago 18 7 0 0

So thrilled to see this work out. the stomach rhythm modulates brain wide electro physiological rhythms in resting wakefulness. It’s been a real privilege to collaborate with brilliant @teresaberther.bsky.social and @danlikesbrains.bsky.social in this project. hopefully first of many

1 month ago 10 2 1 0
Advertisement

New @bodybrainbehaviour.bsky.social preprint, and this is a big one for the lab: @teresaberther.bsky.social did the deepest of dives into #gut-brain coupling with MEG and HD gastrography.

www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...

A brief 🧵on our first trip into this corner of #brain-body #neuroskyence:

1 month ago 46 20 1 4

"...interoceptomimetics that stimulate gut–brain communication may counteract age-associated cognitive decline"

In mice but still 😊
@brainandstomach.bsky.social

My word of the day: "interoceptomimetics"

#MindBrainBody

1 month ago 4 1 0 0
Please wait whilst we redirect you All content on this site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier B.V., its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.

Happy to share our new Opinion now out in @cp-trendsneuro.bsky.social, with Catherine Tallon-Baudry and Anthony Clément!

A dual-function framework of interoception: the information and coordination modes of interoceptive signaling

Full access:
authors.elsevier.com/a/1miOLbotqB...

#neuroskyence

1 month ago 22 12 0 1

#MSCA success rates now below 10%, yet the work that goes into writing this application is immense. Beyond the obvious increase in funding we need to find ways to lighten the time investment as well. Thousands of researchers spend weeks if not months working on this.

2 months ago 26 10 0 2

And I was complaining of Berlin’s —7

2 months ago 1 0 1 0

congrats Diego!!! See you in Rome

2 months ago 1 0 0 0

New preprint with Nicolai Wolpert and Catherine Tallon-Baudry !

Reaction times across three distinct perceptual tasks (total N = 90) varied with the electrical rhythm of the stomach.

#neuroskyence

2 months ago 15 7 0 1
People

Over the years, I have written a few Jupyter/Rmd/Matlab notebooks that attempt to teach some statistical concepts, particularly in neuroimaging. You can find them here: www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/people/rik.h..., though I will say a bit more about each one in a number of posts over next few days.

3 months ago 69 27 6 0

these books were really useful during my PhD. What about yours?
- Analyzing Neural Time Series Data
- Practical MATLAB for Brain and Cognitive Scientists
- Handbook of Psychophysiology
- The Integrative Action of the Autonomic Nervous System
- Handbook of Electrogastrography

3 months ago 1 0 2 0

I'm starting to build the lab's library, and would love hear your #1 essential book recommendation in Autonomic Neuroscience / Interoception, stats for Neuro/Psy science and any other must-have lab bible

3 months ago 5 2 1 0
Advertisement

Is a good bias!!

3 months ago 1 0 0 0

did it double over the last few years?

3 months ago 1 0 1 0

Hive mind: what resources would you recommend for students with little or no coding experience who want to learn MATLAB for cognitive neuroscience? I'm thinking (free) online courses or books

3 months ago 3 2 1 0
Image illustrating sensor placement. The reference sensor is placed on the xiphoid process (just under the sternum), the ground is placed on the left costal margin (just under the bottom rib), and sensors one through four are place over where the stomach would be. Sensor 3 is midway through the umbilicus (navel) and the reference sensor. Sensor 4 is roughly three centimetres from sensor 3 to participant-right. Sensors 2 is also roughly three centimetres away from sensor 3, but along a 45 degree angle upwards and to participant-left. Sensor 1 lies 3 centimetres further from sensor 2, along the same 45 degree line.

Image illustrating sensor placement. The reference sensor is placed on the xiphoid process (just under the sternum), the ground is placed on the left costal margin (just under the bottom rib), and sensors one through four are place over where the stomach would be. Sensor 3 is midway through the umbilicus (navel) and the reference sensor. Sensor 4 is roughly three centimetres from sensor 3 to participant-right. Sensors 2 is also roughly three centimetres away from sensor 3, but along a 45 degree angle upwards and to participant-left. Sensor 1 lies 3 centimetres further from sensor 2, along the same 45 degree line.

Two-panel image showing a processed electrogastrogram. The left panel shows five minutes of raw data from four different leads (measured from the four sensors in the previous image and their common reference). The right panel shows the same signal in frequency space, illustrating the typical normogastric peak at 3 cycles per minute.

Two-panel image showing a processed electrogastrogram. The left panel shows five minutes of raw data from four different leads (measured from the four sensors in the previous image and their common reference). The right panel shows the same signal in frequency space, illustrating the typical normogastric peak at 3 cycles per minute.

Are you curious about electrogastrography, but keep getting chicken-related results when googling "EGG"? We have the preprint for you!

In this tutorial, we describe how to acquire and analyse gastric data from human participants. Plus FREE software! Read it here: arxiv.org/abs/2509.17260

4 months ago 42 18 5 2
Preview
Home - ESCAN 2026 ESCAN 2026 is the 9th ESCAN Conference, the biennial meeting of the European Society for Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience.

The ESCAN 2026 website is now live! → escan2026.eu

Join us in Rome, 3–6 June 2026, for the next European meeting in cognitive and affective neuroscience.

Find the registration info, venue details, and updates all in one place.

More news soon.
#ESCAN2026 #Neuroscience #Rome2026

4 months ago 21 12 0 1

So happy this paper is now out in @plosbiology.org! We investigated whether fluctuations in MEPs can be explained by phasic influences from internal bodily rhythms, and whether this might happen independently per organ system.
#interoception #neuroskyence

5 months ago 67 27 2 0

Thank you @dalmaijer.bsky.social for this excellent spotlight on our stomach-brain synchrony research! The analysis beautifully highlights how "more interoception isn't always better", it's about the context and interpretation of bodily signals.

7 months ago 9 0 0 0
Video

Preprint -
Excited to present WHOLISTIC, which extends the concept of whole-brain functional imaging to the entire body. Pioneering work by incredibly talented Virginia Ruetten @vmsruetten.bsky.social, this platform reveals whole-organism cellular dynamics in vivo.
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...

7 months ago 194 70 3 6
Video

visualizes gut peristalsis together with enteric nervous system activity,

7 months ago 9 1 1 0
Advertisement

Thank you very much Darinka!

7 months ago 0 0 0 0