Advertisement Β· 728 Γ— 90

Posts by Karin Kirk

Remember: We're long past the point where either/or solutions will save us. We need everything we can throw at the problem. We need to reduce demand AND build solar AND build wind, AND everything else we can do.
Pointing the finger at other people only ensures that we all cook together.

1 day ago 1 0 0 0

I don't think we're quite agreeing, though...

1 day ago 0 0 1 0

"When I started writing about the climate crisis in the 1980s I was in my 20s, I didn’t fully comprehend that there could be a force...so steeped in greed & power that it would sacrifice the earth & its inhabitants for its own narrow interests. But there is, it’s Big Oil." @billmckibben.bsky.social

1 day ago 34 11 1 0

πŸ†πŸ†πŸ†

2 days ago 0 0 0 0

uggghhhhh. This is so common and it's enraging. Think of all the talent that we lose by extinguishing all the bright stars like you.

I'm so sorry that happened to you. I'm fucking pissed on your behalf!

2 days ago 1 0 1 0

How far along are you in your plans to build a similar scale wind farm?

Places with proposed wind developments do this same thing: they'll say solar is the better choice. It's hard to take this seriously.

Clean energy, but not here, not now, not like this. Meanwhile more fossil fuels are burned.

2 days ago 1 0 0 0

Nice to meet you too! And yes, exactly, we need both - and then some. That is my exact point. We have run out of time and that truly sucks. Now we need scale and speed.

IPCC: We have a rapidly closing window for large-scale action.

2 days ago 1 0 0 0
Advertisement

Aww ouch, that is a hard thing to realize. I'm sorry!

2 days ago 0 0 1 0

My tomato seedlings are 2" tall, though, so I'll be ok!

2 days ago 0 0 0 0

Ah nice, I bet that was good work.
Yeah, it's heartbreaking to watch us retreat to the Dark Ages, on purpose.
Infuriating, actually.

2 days ago 1 0 1 0

Help me understand what is different between what you said and the way I paraphrased it.

2 days ago 0 0 0 0

We've blown through 1.5 C and are rapidly on our way toward passing 2 C. If you had asked that question 10 years ago I would have said yes. But now it's too late. We need speed and scale. We need rooftops and large scale. Millions more will suffer with every tenth of a degree and every delay.

2 days ago 0 0 1 0

OK well that's good then.
So help me make sense of your assertion that clean energy will (or even could!) destroy all of nature, to the point that there's nothing left to save from climate change.

That argument makes the scale of the problems the opposite of what they really are.

2 days ago 2 0 1 0

thank you. I take comfort knowing that so many of us did not want this outcome.

2 days ago 1 0 1 0

Are you suggesting that a full buildout of clean energy will destroy all of nature? For real?

Are you suggesting that the damage caused by climate change is the same as the impacts of building solar farms?

Because that's... uh.... not even close to true.

2 days ago 2 0 1 0

You can't say you care about nature and then block a solar farm.

Especially with the supposed excuse that it's "places we know."
I'm sure you've heard by now that the places we all know are being ravaged by climate change. Blocking clean energy just creates more pollution and causes more suffering.

2 days ago 3 1 1 0
Advertisement

Certainly, but that's not how things rolled out in my experiences last year.

3 days ago 1 0 0 0

Not just political appointees. The race to meet the whims of Trump was widespread.

3 days ago 1 0 1 0

Fascinating. I was one of thousands of contractors who were laid off from NASA and this was drumming through my head the whole time. Why was NASA gutting its staff when the budget cuts were not actually a real thing? That never made sense to me, and I'm glad to see this report.

3 days ago 12 0 1 0

yes - one or the other, and I don't recall which.

4 days ago 1 0 0 0

We have an EV6 as well and the servicing has been free, except for the cabin filter which cost $60.

5 days ago 0 0 1 0

That reads like it was really fun to write. Kudos!

5 days ago 6 0 0 0

Me too, and it's a perfect illustration that their main purpose is to enrich corporations, at the expense of people.

5 days ago 2 0 1 0

America's right-wing in a single exchange. It's perfect.

6 days ago 2416 557 64 13

Your essay hits home. I'm a ski instructor and I struggle with those same emotions. This winter was absolutely brutal, and it made me more and more mad as I worked on my article and watched the snow disappear under our skis while the industry just seemed to carry on as if this is all fine.

6 days ago 1 0 0 0

This is an excellent summary, very skimmable if you just want to get a sense of the highlights.

A key distinction of our current energy crisis: "This time the alternative is superior."

People - and governments - can walk away from being held hostage by fossil fuels. The freedom feels so good!

6 days ago 31 10 1 0
Advertisement
Preview
The New Twin Fossil Shock How the energy crises of the 2020s speed up the electric age

"Replacing oil imports for road transport with EVs could save importers over $600 billion a year – the single largest lever any country has to cut its import bill."

6 days ago 105 37 2 5

πŸ’― absolutely yes.
They are committing crimes against humanity, gleefully.

6 days ago 3 0 0 0

The negative feedback came from the ski industry, so it's not the typical denial type pushback we're all used to.
But it frames the problem perfectly - we can see exactly where the work needs to be done!

6 days ago 1 0 1 0

I'm with kdr on this one. We need government solutions. But the gov't won't tackle this on their own. They need a lot of pressure. From citizens, from lobbies, from powerful advocacy groups, from everyone who wants a livable planet. We need to fight harder than the oil industry is fighting.

6 days ago 4 3 2 0