I actually don't have strong opinions on formats. I think anything goes so long as everyone at the table agrees.

Great. I always hoped that if World War 3 ever broke out we'd be lead by a gang of lying charlitans. I feel safer already.

Good yuri!

Why did you create an AI image of Mitt Romney telling the nation to go fuck itself?

I dropped out of the game a long time ago too but have kept up with new developments, and I also have a lot of yells at cloud opinions. Ask me about planeswalkers some time.

Explaining to the art directors that the new image styles look too cohsive and not doughy enough.

Hexproof and indestructible are best used for "puzzle" cards where a small but useful effect should be harder to remove. One or two in a set at most. Or as an until end of turn ability so you have to weigh the cost.

They have something called "food tokens" now so I'm not sure if this will work.

Every card should have to explain what a card is.

This is a compelling argument.

Really? Who's that then?

Your honour,

First of all, how dare you,

Seriously though, how come?

Actually no, my spiciest take is this: cards shouldn't have any abilities keyworded into their type line. Basic lands should tell you what mana they tap for in the rules text. Legends should be keyworded (without reminder text).

My spiciest MtG take is that reminder text should be abolished. What's the point of keywords if you have to describe the entire effect on every single card? You haven't summarised an ability if it comes with seventeen words of rules text.

I think I could handle Starmer merely being a corrupt liar. I've managed it with every other PM of my lifetime. But that he's so incompetent that he sets up easy, justified attacks from the all the shittest people is hard to bear.

Regular people watching will note that they tend to face consequences if they fuck up.

On my first read of this I was convinced you were being sarcastic. Please, tell me more about how it's impossible for anyone to be unethical because it would be against the rules.

It's not a very compelling argument in part because two of his examples are "superheroes" and "Star Wars", which no longer dominate movies, and the other is "video games" which, fair play to him, do dominate the field of video games.

Having seen more than zero Marvel movies, I feel extremely confident that nothing in the last film has any relevance whatsoever on the vague series of events that make up the plot.

"The film I made doesn't tell a story that makes any kind of sense by itself. This makes me a genius somehow and not a fucking hack."

The human psychology understander: People always change their behavior if you give them everything they want but say you'd like them to behave differently.

I always thought so and yet people have a lot of opinions about how many spreadsheets I make for fun.

They can't possibly get any worse.

Starmer in a couple of months: No-one told me the results of that inquiry, and I think that's outrageous.

Being the one good kid sucks, doesn't it?

Japanese is the most "there's no way a natural language would work this way" of natural languages.

It's a real shame my brother is such a screw up because if he wasn't I could come out to my parents and they'd still have one good kid.

I would argue that it's quite likely the vast majority of trans lesbians are not dogs, but tend not to talk about it.

Okay. So is the next Dem candidate going to be anti-genocide, or are they going to lose?