'm sorry to hear this, Margaret.
Posts by Sam Paechter
And that's your straw man right there.
Why do we have single sex spaces where women and girls might be vulnerable Prue?
Yup - straw man.
As I said, you haven't been listening.
Why do we have single sex spaces where women and girls might be vulnerable, Prue?
Prue hasn't paid attention to what we actually say, preferring to straw man our position so as to not overly challenge her own.
From @acts_grassroots on X
“#OneYearLater since the Supreme Court's ruling on sex = biology...and what has the government done?
NOTHING
Join us Sat 11 April 1pm
#TickTockTimeIsUp
London, Manchester, Edinburgh, Cardiff, Plymouth, Sunderland, Belfast, Vienna, Berlin, Düsseldorf, Paris.”
Got better things to do.
I think anyone who glances at this conversation can judge for themselves what's going on.
Muting you now.
Better than you do, Swifty.
My sample is the whole of the population of the UK.
How big is yours?
It's not the terms, it's the wild flights of fancy I can't be dealing with.
How many people have been murdered in the UK over the last decade due to "transphobia"?
How can I address your crazy ideological word salad accusations?
They're just really rather silly.
Do you know the answer?
Get your mum to glance up the thread and see if that's really what happened.
A very weird take indeed, Swifty.
Is your Mum upstairs?
Maybe she could come and have glance at this conversation and do a reality check for you.
You've shown yourself to be perfectly capable of it Swifty.
Well, I'm in the UK.
How many murders have there been of trans people in the UK in the last ten to fifteen years in which "transphobia" was a factor?
This, again, is a very silly take, Swifty.
You're getting very tiresome now.
So you assert.
I'm not convinced.
Transwomen and transmen are very different demographics.
As shown by the incarceration stats.
I do not recognise:
Your characterisation of my positions as "transphobic rhetoric"
Your implication that transwomen are particularly prone to be victims of violence
Your assertion that where such violence does occur the motives are political, rather than the usual - intimate partner/punter.
Of course I do.
But you're definition of violence appears to encompass ensuring people play sport in the correct sex category.
sigh
These are not arguments, Swifty, it's just rambling ideological word salad.
Idiot.
Because:
1. I haven't advocated the removal of rights - that's just your misogynistic interpretation of rules to protect women's sport.
2. Actual violence is violence. Criticising your frankly ridiculous position, is not. I don't advocate the former, but the latter is a duty.
Ah so in a universe where both bigotry and and violence have been redefined, I am a passionate proponent of violent bigotry.
My goodness Swifty you are tiresome.
You'll have to explain rather than just assert it.
Bigotry is just a silly insult that people like you throw around, so we can discount that.
As for violence, you've asserted I support it which I don't.
Take it back or show where I demonstrate that I'm a "passionate proponent of violence"
(sigh)
You've just done it again.
You can't help yourself!
😂🤣🤣😅🤣
When you tell your adversary what they believe and argue with that instead of arguing with what they actually say; that's what a straw man IS, Swifty.
And it's also why, when you comprehensively lose this thing, you'll be bewildered.
Because you never listened to what we actually said.
Not only is it a straw man, but the subject didn't feature in this conversation.
Keep track of who you're talking to Swifty
Amazing!
Quite a long conversation and you end with this weird straw man.