Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Didde Elnif

Post image

We’re counting down to #JournalismAI Festival 2025! ⏳

If you haven’t registered yet, now’s the time: online access is free and gives you live access to most sessions streamed from London.

💻 Register now: journalismai.info/festival

Join from wherever you are 🌍

5 months ago 2 3 0 0
Post image

Dagens AI-skörd på Facebook är denna bild med texten:
"Jag ber inte om gåvor, inte om pengar. 🙏 Det enda jag önskar är att hon en dag ska få vara frisk, kunna springa, skratta och leva ett liv som alla andra barn. 🌈 Om du läser detta, lämna gärna en liten hälsning till henne. ❤️"

7 months ago 20 7 4 2

Interested in how journalism is conducted in digital newsrooms? Then this new article - by @janniehartley.bsky.social and @nannathylstrup.bsky.social - is a mustread.

9 months ago 6 3 0 0

Thanks for an inspiring workshop!

10 months ago 1 0 0 0

Earlier this week, I was asked to tell my colleagues about the hashtag#NAMS25 conference. As part of my process, I tested a YouTube transcription tool, Notebook.lm, Canva, Pinpoint, ChatGPT, GPTs, etc. This is what I learned…
www.linkedin.com/pulse/jeg-br...

11 months ago 0 0 0 0

Den er så superfed. Emilia Pérez, men med kant og uden alt det problematiske.

11 months ago 1 0 0 0
Post image

Lise Møller Schilder bliver næstformand for @journalistforbundet.dk med stort flertal

11 months ago 1 0 0 0
Post image

@abthulstrup.bsky.social ny formand for @journalistforbundet.dk i et meget tæt valg #delmøde25

11 months ago 4 0 0 0

Men du kom til at sige, at du nok skal vende tilbage en dag! Hep hep hep! Tak for det arbejde, du har gjort de seneste 4 år!

11 months ago 1 0 1 0
Advertisement

"Our parent company, Paramount, is trying to complete a merger. The Trump administration must approve it. Paramount began to supervise our content in new ways"

11 months ago 5375 1477 101 61
Preview
Columbia Canceled My Course on Race and Media. I'm Going to Teach It Anyway. This is not a time for media literacy or historical knowledge to be held hostage by institutions bending the knee to authoritarianism.

Latest podcast is out: Get in everyone, we are going to Resistance Summer School!

Thank you to everyone who indicated they would like to take my course on Race, Media and International Affairs 101.

Please fill out this quick interest form to begin to sign up!
docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F...

11 months ago 5391 1720 101 95
Post image

Hasn’t JD Vance… shrunk?

11 months ago 15 0 0 0

Så ham svare i en tråd (muligvis på FB), at han generelt gerne vil undgå amerikanske platforme, og dermed også Bluesky

1 year ago 1 0 1 0

I det mindste bruger de Signal… (der må være et godt nyt slogan a la ‘vi kan sikre dig mod datalæk, men ikke mod dumhed ‘)

1 year ago 4 0 1 0

Hvordan omgår du kravet om SIRET-nummer? (hvis du kan svare på det offentligt)

1 year ago 0 0 0 0

Ouch! I haven’t got a subscription, but I’m curious how it’s phrased, are we talking of national elections or elections in general and thereby also eg. American elections

1 year ago 1 0 1 0
Advertisement

De mente ting og alt muligt. UMULIGE arbejdsforhold for en politiker.

1 year ago 12 0 1 0
Post image

Maybe “experts shake their heads” should be considered a automated prefix for every news article concerning Trump’s politics at the moment.

1 year ago 4 0 0 0

Selvfølgelig skal vi kigge på begge dele. For mig er det et problem, at det bliver sort/hvidt, fordi der reelt forgår utroligt meget der er fællesskabsdannende og oplysende, og hvis vi afviser dét uden at forholde os - eller have været på platformen… det synes jeg helt ærligt godt man kan kritisere

1 year ago 1 0 1 0

Helt ærligt, det synes jeg faktisk ikke. Jeg har en helt, helt anden oplevelse både som forsker og bruger af det, der foregår på TikTok end det særligt politikere, men også medier, beskriver. Hvis man lovgiver om some, så mener jeg man, eller i det mindste ens rådgivere, bør have brugt platformen.

1 year ago 1 0 1 0

Jeg er så helt utroligt træt af voksne mennesker, der brokker sig over TikTok uden at have været der. Kulturministeren talte også om en platform for dansevideoer i januar. Det er ligeså boomer-agtigt, som at tale om 'billeder af morgenmad på insta'. Lav i det mindste jeres research.

1 year ago 2 0 2 0

Næste sæson af Last of us er lige på trapperne

1 year ago 5 2 2 0
Scatterplot titled “Empirical Evidence of Ideological Targeting in Federal Layoffs: Agencies seen as liberal are significantly more likely to face DOGE layoffs.”
	•	The x-axis represents Perceived Ideological Leaning of federal agencies, ranging from -2 (Most Liberal) to +2 (Most Conservative), based on survey responses from over 1,500 federal executives.
	•	The y-axis shows Agency Size (Number of Staff) on a logarithmic scale from 1,000 to 1,000,000.

Each point represents a federal agency:
	•	Red dots indicate agencies that experienced DOGE layoffs.
	•	Gray dots indicate agencies with no layoffs.

Key Observations:
	•	Liberal-leaning agencies (left side of the plot) are disproportionately represented among red dots, indicating higher layoff rates.
	•	Notable targeted agencies include:
	•	HHS (Health & Human Services)
	•	EPA (Environmental Protection Agency)
	•	NIH (National Institutes of Health)
	•	CFPB (Consumer Financial Protection Bureau)
	•	Dept. of Education
	•	USAID (U.S. Agency for International Development)
	•	The National Nuclear Security Administration (DOE), despite its conservative leaning (+1 on the scale), is an exception among targeted agencies.
	•	A notable outlier: the Department of Veterans Affairs (moderately conservative) also faced layoffs despite its size.

Takeaway:

The figure visually demonstrates that DOGE layoffs disproportionately targeted liberal-leaning agencies, supporting claims of ideological bias. The pattern reveals that layoffs were not driven by agency size or budget alone but were strongly associated with perceived ideology.

Source: Richardson, Clinton, & Lewis (2018). Elite Perceptions of Agency Ideology and Workforce Skill. The Journal of Politics, 80(1).

Scatterplot titled “Empirical Evidence of Ideological Targeting in Federal Layoffs: Agencies seen as liberal are significantly more likely to face DOGE layoffs.” • The x-axis represents Perceived Ideological Leaning of federal agencies, ranging from -2 (Most Liberal) to +2 (Most Conservative), based on survey responses from over 1,500 federal executives. • The y-axis shows Agency Size (Number of Staff) on a logarithmic scale from 1,000 to 1,000,000. Each point represents a federal agency: • Red dots indicate agencies that experienced DOGE layoffs. • Gray dots indicate agencies with no layoffs. Key Observations: • Liberal-leaning agencies (left side of the plot) are disproportionately represented among red dots, indicating higher layoff rates. • Notable targeted agencies include: • HHS (Health & Human Services) • EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) • NIH (National Institutes of Health) • CFPB (Consumer Financial Protection Bureau) • Dept. of Education • USAID (U.S. Agency for International Development) • The National Nuclear Security Administration (DOE), despite its conservative leaning (+1 on the scale), is an exception among targeted agencies. • A notable outlier: the Department of Veterans Affairs (moderately conservative) also faced layoffs despite its size. Takeaway: The figure visually demonstrates that DOGE layoffs disproportionately targeted liberal-leaning agencies, supporting claims of ideological bias. The pattern reveals that layoffs were not driven by agency size or budget alone but were strongly associated with perceived ideology. Source: Richardson, Clinton, & Lewis (2018). Elite Perceptions of Agency Ideology and Workforce Skill. The Journal of Politics, 80(1).

The DOGE firings have nothing to do with “efficiency” or “cutting waste.” They’re a direct push to weaken federal agencies perceived as liberal. This was evident from the start, and now the data confirms it: targeted agencies overwhelmingly those seen as more left-leaning. 🧵⬇️

1 year ago 10666 4781 252 396
Post image

Everything is fine… from the official White House account on X

1 year ago 2 0 1 0
Advertisement
Preview
Repression gegen Palästina-Bewegung: Polizei in der jungen Welt Repression bei Palästina-Veranstaltung in Räumen der Tageszeitung. UN-Sonderberichterstatterin Francesca Albanese spricht • Foto: Joshua Regitz/jW

Vildt nok. Uniformeret tysk politi tvang sig i dag mod arrangørernes vilje adgang til et foredrag på den tyske avis Junge Welt med Francesca Albanese, FN's særlige rapportør for menneskerettigheder i det besatte Palæstina: www.jungewelt.de/artikel/4942... 🧵

1 year ago 14 6 1 1

Huge congrats to dr. Filstrup! As her supervisors mentioned: she’s both incredibly bright and ditto kind.

1 year ago 5 0 0 0

Oplysning til togbrugere om banens tilstand: hvis du overvejer at tage DSB mellem landsdele i dag, så lad være. Pt. Er jeg to timer forsinket mellem kbh og Odense #da

1 year ago 3 0 0 0
Preview
Pod Save America | Crooked Media

targeted pricing, benefiting from the absence of fixed price tags. By firing the Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Musk could potentially create a more or less unregulated market for that app.
“May you live in interesting times,” as expression goes
crooked.com/podcast-seri...
3/3

1 year ago 3 1 0 0

— applications where you do, well, everything: buy and pay for goods, watch media, debate, etc.
Just like in the Chinese market, this development can lead to differentiated pricing. If your health data show that you need specific medication, it could affect insurance prices — all kinds of
2/3

1 year ago 1 0 1 0

There’s an interesting but chilling interview with Rohit Chopra, the recently fired Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, in the latest episode of Pod Save America (Is Elon a drag on Trump). Chopra talks about Elon Musk’s love of the “everything app” 1/3

1 year ago 3 1 1 0