BIG thank you to @mpwpaulus.bsky.social for his talk "Using AI to Compare What-If Treatment Paths in Depression Care" Stanford AI for Mental Health (AI4MH) Very inspiring! #AI
@eadeli.bsky.social @jkim-1003.bsky.social @coreykeller.bsky.social @manishsaggar.bsky.social
It was so great joining you, Alexa and Leslie, on TechSequences discussing our recent work on early detection of signs of dementia using ambient intelligence.
Can AI help detect Alzheimer's or other dementia, with more time for successful intervention? Join cohosts @alexaraad.bsky.social and @lesliedaigle.bsky.social as they discuss that question with guest Ehsan Adeli ( @eadeli.bsky.social ).
www.techsequences.org/podcasts/202...
Our #ICML2025 paper, led by @ynshah.bsky.social, "Confounder-Free Continual Learning via Recursive Feature Normalization."
If you are in Vancouver, stop by our poster this week!
@stanfordhai.bsky.social @stanfordtailab.bsky.social @stanfordpsy.bsky.social
Through ambient intelligence, AI and computational neuroscientist @eadeli.bsky.social’s research offers a solution for catching early signals of cognitive decline before it's too late. Learn more about this work supported by @stanfordhai.bsky.social ↘️ hai.stanford.edu/news/ambient...
Developing ICU Clinical Behavioral Atlas Using Ambient Intelligence and Computer Vision | NEJM AI ai.nejm.org/doi/full/10....
Great story by Stanford Momentum about our Ambient Intelligence project.
Many thanks to @stanfordpsy.bsky.social and @stanfordhai.bsky.social for funding and supporting the research.
momentum.stanford.edu/stories/ambi...
Great piece by Lance Elliot on @forbes.com highlighting our @stanfordpsy.bsky.social AI4MH inaugural event👇
"AI For Mental Health Gets Attentively Analyzed Via Exciting New Initiative At Stanford University"
www.forbes.com/sites/lancee...
"Science in the US is entering a phase resembling the Lysenko era in the Soviet Union."
www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
holding my new book SUPER AGERS
Excited to get a hold of my new book!
www.simonandschuster.com/books/Super-...
What about a 4x accept on initial reviews?
... as it requires a deeper understanding of the physical world, embodiment, and real-world interactions beyond textual abstraction. Her perspective on how these two forms of intelligence complement each other in AI advancements was truly fascinating!
I found her insights on the comparison between spatial intelligence and language intelligence especially thought-provoking. While language intelligence has made remarkable progress with large language models, spatial intelligence presents unique challenges, as ...
It was great having @stanfordhai.bsky.social's @drfeifei.bsky.social in my class today (aimedv.stanford.edu)! We had an insightful conversation about generative AI, spatial intelligence, & healthcare, all thoughtfully wrapped around discussions of ethics, human-centered design, & real-world impact.
What about CVPR2030?
Just to clarify, sometime a disrespectful email from the AC to the reviewer can be considered as a form on punishment! 😉
Also to further clarify, I have AC/SAC roles in conferences these days, but have seen such emails sent to my colleagues!
My #NIH review panel meeting got cancelled less than 24 hours before its meeting start. So crazy! I spent days to review my batch of 8 full proposals (R01)! Poor investigators whose grant proposals were being reviewed in the panel and many other panels cancelled in the past month!
I agree with your note. I am just trying to put myself in the shoes of someone who is seeing this unfolding, from outside!!
Indeed. At this scale, we are in dire need of better tooling.
But, Christian, I want to also argue: if this is all volentary work, how do we justify punishing late/no-show reviewers? So are we saying late-reviewers are bad, but it is ok for PCs/ACs/SACs to be late because this volentary?
And if you professionalize this, there is the risk of incentivising revenue and money-making, and losing the entire community, like how some open access and predatory journals are acting now! (outsourcing is even worse, because they don't understand the value of the science being published!)
“LeCun, who earned his bachelor's and Ph.D. in France , said the changes in the United States should be a wake-up call for European institutions and companies. "You may have an opportunity to attract some of the best scientists in the world," he wrote.”
www.businessinsider.com/meta-yann-le...
I keep thinking about the campaign slogan "We Are Not Going Back," which I didn't like....but it turned out to be prescient.
As in Orwellian 1984.
A tough road ahead to get us back on track. But we will.
#standupforscience2025
This was the team that created recommendations on how to properly evaluate AI models to get software as a medical device approvals.
FDA, over the weekend, laid off its entire team (almost) of AI research for medical devices. Sad and scary days!
Sad times, we live in.
What tech company will be the first to stand up and say that gutting the NSF is bad actually?
The economic argument seems pretty clear
Less NSF --> fewer PhD students --> fewer researchers --> smaller AI tech pipeline --> slower progress --> less competitive globally
#KostasThoughts: As an AC, it’s frustrating when reviewers only see the rebuttal through the lens of their own review. Step back—consider all reviews and discussions. DON’T rush to finalize; see the FULL picture!
