Yes, the first 5 lines are about opposing 'outrageous fortune'. But the shift after that is about death and what happens "When we have shuffled off this mortal coil..." Especially, "When he himself might his quietus make/With a bare bodkin?"
Posts by Bibliophile01
Oh, I see. I make a comment about a screenshot and you turn it into an ad hominem. Well played.
Hmm....don't see anything in that screenshot I have a problem with. And it's well known that AIPAC spent tens of millions to sabotage the campaigns of Bowman and Bush.
Excellent. That'll teach 'em. They want a blockade? We'll show 'em a blockade.
Oh wait, does that mean no crude or fertilizer gets to the US?
Yes. But we cannot just settle for anyone just because they are a Dem. We simply cannot elect someone financially beholden to Israel. Period. And both Harris and Kelly have taken millions from AIPAC.
Excellent. That'll teach 'em. They want a blockade? We'll show 'em a blockade.
Oh wait, does that mean no crude or fertilizer gets to the US?
Ya, great.
Ok, thanks. I live in NH so I won't be visiting any time soon...lol
But I'll give them a call. I used to regularly buy books from them online back in the day.
No. I went to Powell's online. They don't actually have a separate listing of signed books. I put your name in a search engine but it was impossible to tell if any books were signed. I'll try again.
Well, I couldn't find a single one.
Ya, I'm totally out of the loop. This guy is a MAGA influencer? OMG...
“The children of tribal Indians are not birthright citizens.” – Sauer
If Gorsuch pursues the argument about the distinction between tribal sovereignty and birthright citizenship it would enlarge this case and potentially alter the course of History. Clearly, Sauer was not ready for this scenario.
“The children of tribal Indians are not birthright citizens.” – Sauer
If Gorsuch pursues the argument about the distinction between tribal sovereignty and birthright citizenship it would enlarge this case and potentially alter the course of History. Clearly, Sauer was not ready for this scenario.
“The children of tribal Indians are not birthright citizens.” – Sauer
If Gorsuch pursues the argument about the distinction between tribal sovereignty and birthright citizenship it would enlarge this case and potentially alter the course of History. Clearly, Sauer was not ready for this scenario.
Aliens as demons is right out of the Marjorie Taylor Greene school of ET study. Must be some kind of Xtian fundamentalist way of deflecting from the unacceptable idea of intelligent life on other planets to the crazy, if cozily familiar world of angels and demons.
“The children of tribal Indians are not birthright citizens.” – Sauer
If Gorsuch pursues the argument about the distinction between tribal sovereignty and birthright citizenship it would enlarge this case and potentially alter the course of History. Clearly, Sauer was not ready for this scenario.
Was it Bob Costas who noted that it's men who transition to women to compete with them and not the other way around. Why is that?
Was it Bob Costas who noted that it's men who transition to women to compete with them and not the other way around. Why is that?
Exactly. And which is why Booker is a tool. At least Chris Christie had the guts to name Lindsay Graham on Bill Maher's show when he said that Repubs tell him one thing privately and another publicly.
Netanyahu found a willing tool in the WH. BUT that doesn't mean that Harris would have opposed his war of choice. She like every other politicians defaults to, "Israel has a right to defend itself." I don't trust any of them.
One Democrat is throwing your privacy under the bus. It’s not too late to stop him.
Of course he backtracked. Israel is the third rail. No one in the msm or government questions them. No one criticizes them. Everyone defers to them. No one asks why the US should raise hundreds of billions to wage their war. No one asks why US boot should be on the ground by not Israeli.
Sorry, Sen Booker, if your colleagues, are "afraid or unwilling to say these things publicly" then they are NOT good people. What they say privately is irrelevant. If they can't tell the American people the truth, they are either lying by omission, or lying by deceit. In any case, they are liars.
Sorry, Sen Booker, if your colleagues, are "afraid or unwilling to say these things publicly" then they are NOT good people. What they say privately is irrelevant. If they can't tell the American people the truth, they are either lying by omission, or lying by deceit. In any case, they are liars.
Sorry, Sen Booker, if your colleagues, are "afraid or unwilling to say these things publicly" then they are NOT good people. What they say privately is irrelevant. If they can't tell the American people the truth, they are either lying by omission, or lying by deceit. In any case, they are liars.
Infantile bullshit.
Oh, I must have missed it when Schumer endorsed him. And Jeffries did so only when it was clear that Mamdani would win. Except for Bernie and Warren, everyone else kept mum.
Schumer begged Mills to run because the idea of Platner in the Senate was anathema. And he has exactly 2 Senate endorsements.
Lol... The Dem party might have been liberal back in JFK's day. But hasn't been since Clinton moved it to the right.
It's called History. You might want to acquaint yourself with it.