Not to brag, but I can be bought on the cheap.

Congratulations on discovering nuance, funny it only applies to China and Piker. Anyway, not interested in being your rage bait, but look up Piker and Russia/Ukraine next. Or preferably go and touch grass, as they say. Stop looking for enemies and try having healthy conversations. Best!

Look into it.

Except that he isn’t silent on China. He is an active supporter of the regime. He has talked about them extensively and travelled there in support.

Fetterman is never winning another primary, no one thinks he is a representative Democrat. Slotkin voted against ICE funding.

He is pro China despite the Uygur genocide, not to mention Tibet/Taiwan/Hong Kong. He couldn’t care less about the Armenian genocide and supported Turkey’s denials. Hi is pro-Russia as they fight a genocidal war against Ukraine. Pro Iran regime. I mean, come on…

I have no idea about anything about you. Why are you writing about yourself? I’m talking about Piker. Who is antisemitic.

I don’t think you are actually responding to what I said. What I am saying is that Piker, who Waj is embracing, also uses antizionism as a mask. Like so many. It’s not really about Israel, it’s about Jews. (PS I can’t stand the Israeli government)

The current Israeli government is frankly horrific. But both Carlson and Piker have a series of vile opinions. I reject the idea that we need to embrace people like Piker.

But he is saying Dems should embrace Piker, whose opinions are frankly vile. I oppose militarism. I also oppose Piker. I think both are possible.

I’m saying democrats against genocide should definitely be against Piker. Unless they don’t actually care about genocide.

I don’t think the word Zionist has a real meaning at this point. Nor the word anti-Zionist. But I do think a number of people, including at Bondi Beach and other such atrocities, use the term anti-Zionist as a mask for Jew hatred. Nothing to do with Israel.

We’re talking about whether the Dems should be embracing Piker, who seems to have not much problem with the Chinese genocide against the Uygurs. So…fictional Jesus would have been on my side?

I can’t parse that sentence. I have no idea what you are talking about. I have a State Department wish list? You seem to assume a lot about me, and I can’t even tell what you are assuming.

But it is not misplaced, Piker is a dangerous hateful crank. Look at his views on the Chinese, despite the Uygurs/Taiwan/Tibet/Hong Kong. Or his views on Russia attacking Ukraine. It’s the Jews that offend him.

Yeah Tucker and company are normal decent people

Nah. It’s very popular to be against Jews. Piker is a huge fan of the Chinese, despite what’s going on with the Uygurs. Not to mention Tibet/Taiwan/Hong Kong.

Wan was specifically condemning Dems for rejecting Piker, read his whole thread.

Everyone is always sure that Jesus would have agreed with them. Me, I have no idea. And neither do you.

I am suppressing nothing. Look, people can say what they want, I am all for reasonable debate. But my experience is that the Piker fans love to shout down the opposition, it’s part of what they do.

Jewish history is full of people deciding to side with antisemites because it is the majority position. I say you can have a clear moral stance of Israel and still reject Piker and his ilk.

What you want, I think, it your brand of criticism. It’s the politics that eschews nuance because you can’t see the nuance. Piker’s anti-Jewish bent and say the J Street stances are very, very different things.

Every Democrat is against ICE. Taxing the rich is mainstream Dem. And personally, I can’t stand Netanyahu. But look, being anti-immigrant was also a MAJORITY position. Being a majority doesn’t make it moral. And being critical of Israel and siding with the Jew haters are different.

You want Democrats to take up the positions of the worst antisemites because those positions are popular? Jesus.

Someone else posted deviled eggs. That person did it right.

Amazing the quality of iPhone cameras nowadays.

I mean, I will take the obvious joke

It kind of speaks to me

Putin

Meaningless, since he will still caucus with the GOP