NIH is reworking social and behavioral study sections including *eliminating SSPA and SSPB*. There will be one new study section Population Dynamics and Health.
Bad news since SSP originally received so many applications, they needed 2 difft study sections to process them.
:( #demography
In “Cohort Prevalence Estimates Are Sensitive to Prebaseline Mortality,” Molly Rosenberg et al. show that “prebaseline mortality patterns can meaningfully impact health outcome measures in cohort studies” & so represent a potential source of bias. read.dukeupress.edu/demography/a...
It must be very hard to publish null results Publication practices in the social sciences act as a filter that favors statistically significant results over null findings. While the problem of selection on significance (SoS) is well-known in theory, it has been difficult to measure its scope empirically, and it has been challenging to determine how selection varies across contexts. In this article, we use large language models to extract granular and validated data on about 100,000 articles published in over 150 political science journals from 2010 to 2024. We show that fewer than 2% of articles that rely on statistical methods report null-only findings in their abstracts, while over 90% of papers highlight significant results. To put these findings in perspective, we develop and calibrate a simple model of publication bias. Across a range of plausible assumptions, we find that statistically significant results are estimated to be one to two orders of magnitude more likely to enter the published record than null results. Leveraging metadata extracted from individual articles, we show that the pattern of strong SoS holds across subfields, journals, methods, and time periods. However, a few factors such as pre-registration and randomized experiments correlate with greater acceptance of null results. We conclude by discussing implications for the field and the potential of our new dataset for investigating other questions about political science.
I have a new paper. We look at ~all stats articles in political science post-2010 & show that 94% have abstracts that claim to reject a null. Only 2% present only null results. This is hard to explain unless the research process has a filter that only lets rejections through.
The CPS 2025 November monthly data are now available on IPUMS CPS 🎉 CPS data collection and processing were among the many U.S. government programs and services interrupted by the October 1-November 12, 2025 U.S. government shutdown. Learn more: blog.popdata.org/2025-u-s-gov...
1/ The BLS has published an FAQ about the November Current Population Survey (CPS data).
bls.gov/cps/methods/...
(Recall, in his press conference Powell mentioned "technical" issues with some November surveys.)
NextGenPop scholars at Cornell in 2023
NextGenPop scholars at the University of Wisconsin Madison in 2022
NextGenPop is a 2-week, in-person, on-campus summer experience for undergrads aiming to increase the diversity of the population field and nurture the next generation of scholars. The summer 2026 session will be hosted by the University of Minnesota! Application deadline February 5. buff.ly/IO6P52W
Sorry, one more follow up. My colleague recommended that you use the California county population estimates by race/ethnicity, which will include all California counties. dof.ca.gov/forecasting/...
There are a few more things you might try. Email us at ipums@umn.edu.
IPUMS NHGIS search result page for county geographic level + Hispanic Origin topics. A short list of search results for the 2023 ACS is shown.
IPUMS NHGIS (www.nhgis.org) would get you this for 2023 and 2024 is coming soon.
The newest NHIS data are now available through IPUMS!
I should note that this is just one of several dozen calls for comment about health data that have come out over the past week. You can find a running list here:
federaldataforum.prb.org/discussion/c...
Check out this blog post describing our hands-on IAPHS workshop from fall 2024 featuring the NHIS LMF data harmonized by IPUMS. @ipums.bsky.social
A screen shot of the National Couples' Health and Time Study webiste at DSDR, with the language "This repository is under review for potential modification in compliance with Administration directives." at the top circled in red.
I just noticed that NCHAT's @icpsr.bsky.social website has a new disclaimer "This repository is under review for potential modification in compliance with Administration directives." I am not sure what this means, but I wanted to let everyone know.
That's amazing, what a great outcome!
I've always thought Jessica Ho's piece on the contribution of opioid overdoses to the education gradient in life expectancy was a clever way of getting around imperfect mortality data by combining data from two different sources. link.springer.com/article/10.1...
🌟Please share this great funding opportunity! 🌟Apply by 1/24/25 for IRP's National Dissertation Award For Research On Poverty And Economic Mobility 2025–2026. For more info on this $25,000 award & to view an informational webinar, visit: www.irp.wisc.edu/national-dis...
Exercises using the IPUMS DHS data: www.idhsdata.org/idhs/exercis...
Check out the IPUMS Global Health annual research award winners for 2018-2023 www.ipums.org/impact/ipums...
Plans to link the 1950 full count to HRS, WLS, NSHAP, and Kaiser's ACT are documented here: assets.ipums.org/_files/ipums...
