Advertisement ยท 728 ร— 90

Posts by Lux ๐Ÿคท๐Ÿปโ€โ™€๏ธ Alptraum

I want free computer

47 minutes ago 2 0 1 0

Ideally a sapphic who wants to marry me

57 minutes ago 10 0 1 0

Not to do a Girl Boss but when will a woman run Apple

57 minutes ago 9 0 2 0
Preview
a man wearing a wig and a white shirt has his mouth open Alt: Hugh Laurie as Prince George
1 hour ago 4 0 1 0

Ugh

1 hour ago 1 0 0 0
32
The King
November 1814
Early in November 1814 Mr Norrell was honoured by a visit from some very noble gentlemen - an earl, a duke and two baronets - who came, they said, to speak to him upon a matter of the utmost delicacy and were so discreet themselves that half an hour after they had begun talking Mr Norrell was still entirely ignorant of what they wished him to do.
It emerged that, elevated as these gentlemen were, they were the representatives of one still greater - the Duke of York - and they had come to speak to Mr Norrell about the madness of the King. The King's sons had recently paid a visit to their father and had been very shocked by his sad condition; and, though all of them were selfish and some of them were dissolute and none of them were much given to making sacrifices of any sort, they had all told each other how they would give any amount of money and cut off any number of limbs to make the King a little more comfortable.
But, just as the King's children quarrelled amongst themselves as to which doctor their father should have, so they now quarrelled as to whether or not a magician should attend the King. Chief in opposition to the idea was the Prince Regent. Many years before, during the life of the great Mr Pitt, the King had suffered a severe bout of madness and the Prince had ruled in his place, but then the King had recovered and the Prince had found his powers and privileges stripped away from him. Of all the tiresome situations in the world,

32 The King November 1814 Early in November 1814 Mr Norrell was honoured by a visit from some very noble gentlemen - an earl, a duke and two baronets - who came, they said, to speak to him upon a matter of the utmost delicacy and were so discreet themselves that half an hour after they had begun talking Mr Norrell was still entirely ignorant of what they wished him to do. It emerged that, elevated as these gentlemen were, they were the representatives of one still greater - the Duke of York - and they had come to speak to Mr Norrell about the madness of the King. The King's sons had recently paid a visit to their father and had been very shocked by his sad condition; and, though all of them were selfish and some of them were dissolute and none of them were much given to making sacrifices of any sort, they had all told each other how they would give any amount of money and cut off any number of limbs to make the King a little more comfortable. But, just as the King's children quarrelled amongst themselves as to which doctor their father should have, so they now quarrelled as to whether or not a magician should attend the King. Chief in opposition to the idea was the Prince Regent. Many years before, during the life of the great Mr Pitt, the King had suffered a severe bout of madness and the Prince had ruled in his place, but then the King had recovered and the Prince had found his powers and privileges stripped away from him. Of all the tiresome situations in the world,

Visions of Hugh Laurie dancing in my head

1 hour ago 5 1 1 0

Israel nominally โ€œwonโ€ the war that initially inspired that flag soโ€ฆ is it about Iran now? What is happening.

1 hour ago 8 0 0 0

Thereโ€™s someone on my block who still has an Israeli flag declaring ื‘ื™ื—ื“ ื ื ืฆื— (Together we will win) and I just donโ€™t even know what that means in April 2026

1 hour ago 16 0 3 0

Yeah the more I think through this the more I'm realizing that when people talk about "vulnerability" I hear "giving other people the power to hurt me" and I have been so severely fucked over by so many people that I simply have no interest in doing that, lol

3 hours ago 7 0 1 0
Advertisement

And, IDK, maybe other people define vulnerability differently? But to me it is definitionally a matter of making myself less safe, and I simply will not do that in most spaces anymore. It doesn't go well!

3 hours ago 8 0 1 0

... when I saw Louis CK at my gym ... I wanna say eight years ago? โ€” were moments I deeply regretted later on because of the ways they put me at risk. When I disclose personal stuff these days, it's usually after a lot of consideration as to how it impacts my safety.

3 hours ago 4 0 1 0

That may sound weird coming from someone who openly talks about mental illness and sexuality and whatever, but I'm actually way more guarded than you probably realize! Some of the rare times I have actually gotten publicly vulnerable in recent memory โ€” like live tweeting the anxiety I had...

3 hours ago 5 0 1 0

I used to make myself extremely vulnerable as a matter of course and it got weaponized against me and now I simply do not do that shit anymore ๐Ÿคท๐Ÿปโ€โ™€๏ธ

3 hours ago 8 0 1 0

Been finding myself in spaces where people talk about vulnerability with an almost religious fervor and I'm not really sure what to make of it

3 hours ago 10 1 2 0

People get deeply offended by the idea that someone might make a statement in public and choose to limit how they engage with others about that statement which... IDK man, people are weird.

3 hours ago 3 0 1 0

I think it's a modified version of 1, and that people feel an entitlement to posters in a way that's not unlike the entitlement they feel to celebrities. There's this idea that if you put yourself out in the public in any way you have suddenly voided your boundaries and it is... pretty gross!

3 hours ago 2 0 1 0
Advertisement

Exactly

3 hours ago 1 0 1 0

I don't even know that one, I'm pissy because I used to hang out with OG Onion people who were actually funny

3 hours ago 7 0 0 0

โ€œTheyโ€ is really the author but then also the people who chose to adapt the work into a show

4 hours ago 2 0 0 0

Oh I know

4 hours ago 2 0 1 0

I recognize that other LGBTQ+ people like it, let me remind you that

A) as a community we are not a monolith

B) I am the number one Tim Onion hater

4 hours ago 29 1 4 0

Feels disrespectful to the people who were held back by insurmountable oppression to make it seem like they just didnโ€™t try hard enough

4 hours ago 13 0 1 0

I mean the show is good but I always find stuff like that weird

4 hours ago 10 0 1 0

Iโ€™m very belatedly watching Queenโ€™s Gambit and I feel weird about the fact that they just made up a gender swapped Bobby Fischer character, it feels like it weirdly ignores *why* you didnโ€™t see women prevailing in chess back then even as it tries to tell a story about sexism?

4 hours ago 15 0 4 0
Advertisement

But I guess one way of thinking it is, how would we feel if someone bought, IDK, Nick Fuentesโ€™s website and redid the logo with Jewish symbols? I would not feel like that was some big win against antisemitism myself.

4 hours ago 5 0 1 0

I mean whether or not itโ€™s problematic itโ€™s fucking stupid

4 hours ago 3 0 1 0

Itโ€™s just yet another stupid stunt and I donโ€™t think โ€œwe made the homophobeโ€™s logo gayโ€ is funny or particularly helpful to queer people

4 hours ago 30 1 5 0
The text โ€œInfowars, now 110% more gay.โ€ above a new logo for Infowars with rainbow text and an onion instead of an O

The text โ€œInfowars, now 110% more gay.โ€ above a new logo for Infowars with rainbow text and an onion instead of an O

I hate this

4 hours ago 32 1 3 0
Embroidered flowers and faces

Embroidered flowers and faces

Finally got more 817 red so the flowers are done. Iโ€™m thinking olive branches on the sides and then that will inform if I need to put something in the center.

4 hours ago 9 0 0 0

Like there's a line you have to walk between charming bitch and narcissistic abuser and I think they've repeatedly crossed it without realizing it and I find that weird

5 hours ago 4 0 1 0