Examining how a firm's use of consumer data for price discrimination affect welfare by showing that the structure of consumer demand curves determines whether the data is good or bad, from Maryam Farboodi, Nima Haghpanah, and Ali Shourideh www.nber.org/papers/w34514
Joel Mokyr at the 2011 conference in his honour at Northwestern.
Elated at Joel Mokyr's Nobel Prize! You can find numerous accounts -now multiplying by the minute- of his scholarly contributions. Today I want to celebrate the man and the mentor.
85 million people. It’s hard to forget that the war on terror gave the world more terror. Anyways, if you see someone from Iran these days go easy on them. We didn’t choose this.
that in order to get a hostile entity be incentivized, you have to create costs for them. Unfortunately, at this point it’s hard to see how these attacks - supported by all leaders of the “free” world - even if they lead to a regime change will bring peace, prosperity and democracy for a country of
nuclear program. We are also being bombarded at the behest of a war mongering criminal who seems like soon will be joined by another opportunist. It’s hard to describe the extent of hopelessness that this entails. As far as I can tell, wars don’t bring democracy and peace. The economist in me knows
I don’t know if anyone actually sees this given that I never post but here it goes. If you see Iranians these days be a bit gentler with them. We are going through something horrific. Our nation is in the hand of a few individuals who don’t seem to care about anything other than having a useless
Question for political scientists/economists: obviously trump has in numerous times tried and or successfully violated the role of law. But this is not limited to him. Obama infamously killed a U.S. citizen without due process. So my question is whether these violations are ever quantified.
Hard to argue with Matthias here. Big loss for us and good for Europe.
I realize maybe tit-for-tat is not the right word to use here but say I am a referee and for some idiosyncratic reason i don't like something in a paper. If I am a repeat referee I keep rejecting the paper. The tit-for-tat can happen if the authors learn my identity and use the same strategy on me!
Wouldn’t you want to avoid tit for tat behavior in refereeing?
Statutory or the actual ones paid?
Just so it’s clear, the government wanted to oversee hiring and employment at a *private* institution in order to implement a purity test. When the institution refused, they took away money for life saving research (cancer etc).
That’s some fascist shit.
Oh that! Sure. I read the Atlantic, New Yorker and the Wired. Everywhere else I just follow the headlines. No reason to read the texts!!
I didn’t get the NYT part!?🤔
Happy Norwooz!
Tomorrow is the winter solstice and official start of spring ! Beyond its symbolic significance, it’s a time of cleaning. Let’s hope for this particular cleaning sometime soon (and those in the west who wish to act accordingly)!
Even when they have time, the opponents, they don’t seem to know where to run !!!(schumer)
Yet everyday something new and unbelievable! WTH??!!
Is the logic very different from equilibria involved in Pareto dominated strategies in infinitely repeated games?
there is an obscure old one that Ricky Vohra told us about by Anderson and Nash! I haven’t read it super carefully but it has some very powerful results!
And ignoring any experts’ advice.
While I think invasion of Iraq was worse for the world than trump up to now, I think there is a difference here. That was done within the confines of the democratic institutions - majority U.S. population was behind it, and some experts. What’s happening now is outside of the democratic institutions
Spare a thought for your green-card holding and naturalized colleagues, many of whom are now doing risk-benefit calculations before speaking on anything that could be considered remotely political
My personal opinion is that Hamas is ultimately responsible for all the atrocities committed by Israel. Yet, how can we possibly punish a person for simply stating they are pro Hamas?
The thunderstorm of terrible U.S. government actions continues. Free speech is only applied selectively! I read the coverage of several outlets and it seems like the only crime here is supporting Hamas.
www.reuters.com/world/us/us-...
People on the left might be mad at me for saying this due to her position on abortion but isn't it better if we can have a position that doesn't fit the party line and that does not warrant wanting to punch each other?
That is why I found the fact that someone deemed to be on the very right voted without her politics is something to celebrate. I am sure she got some angry phone calls from the orange man or the genius with the buzzsaw! Maybe something positive to hang on to but maybe too early!
To call myself angry these days whenever I open my browser and I am not reading a math theorem is an understatement! I find it extremely difficult to see anything positive. And I was able to in '17 despite being on the receiving end of the muslim ban!
Many congrats!
I have to admit that while people are quite shocked by the WH events today, to me this is simply just a sign of what this administration is doing. In fact, perhaps it is quite good that Zelensky decided fight back against the bogus claims. To me, we crossed a line when we voted for Russia in the UN!
Never mind!! Very hard to avoid it!!! :-(