I mean, it *contributes...*
Posts by Omio
"For glory, Garlemaldπ΅"
DON'T ASK ME WHY D:
Decided to do one of the gimmick things that are floating about.
#My9MTGCards #η§γδ½γ£γγγΈγγ―9ζ
soichirow.github.io/my-9-cards-m...
If it lands the follow-up combo, it deserves the win... ...but also it misses out on warm pets, so I'll try to pet it.
I have three archetypes at the same time, all in one class. PF1e.
Yaaaayyyyyy, more sexism stuff crossing my feed.
...can I just go back to being invisible, please? I got the memo that I was unwanted and irrelevant two decades ago, and I still hold that close to heart.
I don't even make enough to be useful.
I, THE GM, WILL ASK YOU FOR YOUR PERCEPTION BEFORE THE GAME STARTS EVEN IN 5E TO SPEED THINGS UP.
I can do math really fast. A bunch of y'all can't.
What's wrong with being cute, huh?
You don't like being appealing?
...that's what I thought. >:3c
A theory I just had *if this is authentic* - OPSEC honeypot tactic?
Depends on some other credibility things - are they saying that they're an active, serving member of the Navy when not streaming? O_o
In that case, they'd need to basically dox themselves the moment that happens.
Ah, okay. Thank you for the distinction.
I coulda swore the orange cheeto with hair called the military in on a couple of protests, and the military didn't move because the conditions for them to mobilize didn't happen.
And now I don't trust search engines to give me accurate results.
Oh.
... :<
[Slithered off elsewhere.]
Cool by me, I just want warmth, most times, and skipping chat for sharing heat is a win-win to me too.
...though I get if you're unsettled by a snek. :<
Sadly, the sexism has absolutely not gone anywhere, and likely won't for a century because society moves slower than people realize.
Shit's rough. ><;
I 'unno, the military seems be used against their own people without clear issue, so resistance was made futile.
You highlight exactly *why* I stand by "we went into trans support too soon" - we went into enabling transitions without fixing the underlying sexism that makes visibility quite one-sided.
We are tired for different reasons, but I fully agree as to why you're tired, champ.
States and Israel have the same problem - their government represents themselves, not their people. Even if the people disapprove of their government, they do not have the tools to rebel.
γγγγΏγπ
γγ―γγο½π
γ―γγγγγγΏγͺγγπ΄
And in case it isn't obvious, I'm way over in Canada. θ
γγγ°γγγ π
I straight-up couldn't decide! D:
As said in an extension-part, the ideas aren't mutually exclusive, either - so both are viable (though introduces a risk of false positives when combined).
Maybe the artist would rather things be discreet? Maybe they'll feel like they built the conversation from showing it from their side? That much said, having both options at once seems "optimal" to me. Options are always better. cx
A fair take, but my background is more "computer science" than "artist" by about the distance between here and the moon, and it implies that the arcade social media is actually being observed by us.
I'd rather take the "the "vandal" will do it again" way than "go social and hope they come forward."
Positive argument for things like eyestrain and seizures.
Negative argument for things like an aversion to turning left, or disliking pineapple on pizza.
SCREAMING THIS FROM THE FUCKING ROOFTOPS
The TotK world's amnesia tells me that Link's involvement in BotW meant nothing.
Story-wise, it made no sense for so many to seemingly *forget* him.