(on the other hand leicesterians at the border would invent national chauvinism just to insult adrestians and faerghans so it evens out)
Posts by slotumn🔞 (toxic golden deer stan) (only half joking)
unironically tbh (silver snow the only structurally anti-war route in the game bc it says "war is bad" and doesn't follow it up with "but [good accomplishment])
man i love technology that can get us clean energy and a deterrent
how it feels to be a south korean supporting nuclear development right now
"garreg mach is a safe haven for those who need it"
>open
>terror attacks, assassination attempts, kidnappings
people miss that edelgard's actual political beef with the church is that they did not do this and respected ten elites' descendants too much
fódlan if rhea said "sorry but the crest/relic fetishism and power worship warlordism WILL stop" and did turbo cultural repression on northerners right after war of heroes to ensure infinite adrestian hegemony
#KILLALLNOBLES Mar 6: Violence/Mundane Mar 7: Outlast/Forgotten Mar 8: Power/History
Guidelines to #KillAllNobles -All works must focus on character(s) who is a commoner at start of canon; this includes most characters whose in-game starting class is Commoner -Characters born as commoners who are/were adopted by nobles (ex: Ashe, Yuri), or gain titles later (ex: Byleth) qualify -Former nobles who no longer hold titles at the start of canon (ex: Mercedes, Hanneman) qualify if the work portrays period(s) of their life when they are not nobles (with exception of Constance, who still considers herself nobility and aspires to restore her status) -Characters whose class backgrounds are unknown (ex: Nader) qualify if they are portrayed as commoners in the work -All of above characters qualify even if they are portrayed as class traitors and/or aiding nobility -AUs are allowed as long as it focuses on the above characters and the class difference in canon is reflected in some way -Characters who are nobles at start of canon cannot be the focus; this includes all characters whose in-game starting class is Noble (with exception of Balthus, who faced problems due to his mother being low-class and does not live as a noble at the start of canon for all practical purposes) -Nobles who abdicate, rescind, or otherwise lose titles mid/post-canon do not qualify -Non-Fódlan nobility and royalty (ex: Petra, Shahid, Sreng chiefs) do not qualify -Precursors of canon era nobility (Nemesis, Ten Elites, Wilhelm) do not qualify -Agarthans (aside from Shez) and non-homunculi Nabateans do not qualify, as they predate and/or exist outside of canon era class systems -All of above characters do not qualify even if they are portrayed as class traitors or aiding commoners -AUs where characters are status swapped or otherwise do not reflect the canon class difference in some way are not allowed Anything goes as long as it meets the above criteria and is tagged properly.
Oh boy! Look at what time it is!
It's #KillAllNobles o'clock!
Join us this weekend and let the commoners go wild.
#FE3H #FireEmblemThreeHouses #fandomevent
"oh you've got a dream you want to make a reality? well fuck noble dreams" -the only correct response to the lords
claude doesn't need to be almyran king, he already got to play chessmaster through noble hereditary privileges once. you don't to do it twice go retire with your wife
lysiclaude paired ending is good for the romantic reasons but if you think about it, there's also the benefit of removing two genocide beneficiary nobles from power #darkwoke
basically if anybody had invested seriously in teaching how to do administration and bureaucracy to northerners a few centuries before canon, be that the empire or the northerners themselves, fódlan would probably have been somewhat less cooked,
but adrestians who already developed institutions and bureaucracy and didn't even have relics, yet are also the most likely to take the religion thing seriously bc seiros is /their/ saint, started at 5~6 and backslid to 0 a thousand years later
also i think one of the issues with the church's doctrine is that the "be nice to people and don't abuse crests" was probably aimed at the northerners fresh out of war of heroes and meant to take them from -10 nemesis brain personalist warlordery to 0
stop calling faerghus a conservative ultra religious rigidly hierarchal society, you are giving them too much credit if you assume that they understand seiros orthodoxy or the concept of a stable non-personalist hierarchy that can outlast individual rulers
this isn't really a glaze on dimitri or lambert as much as an indictment on all the blaiddyds from loog up until them. why did the kingdom not conceive of what institutions were up until them
that's right trying to make a functioning government in the kingdom means you have to spend time gathering wartime military intel against people who are supposed to be members of the government
another thing is dimitri saying that faerghus has to take the reforms slower
that's not him being "conservative" that's called "reform in faerghus = civil war because the noble bloc opposed to reform are literal cavemen who refuse the concept of a state to be reformed"
lonato's clearly meant to be emotionally sympathetic/understandable but that doesn't mean he's portrayed as smart or even politically viable as anything beyond a pawn for larger games in-universe, imo mostly bc he's blinded by grief/anger + honor culture brained
that's the normal reaction for a politician and a commander in a war, but the way some ppl talk about it you'd think edelgard and co. got there bc they want to emotionally support lonato or something
ex: edelgard's reaction in scarlet blaze to lonato was not "let's go lonato we're with you! death to the central church!!" it was very clearly "is this bitch stupid? we had a plan about how we were going to coordinate this and he pulls this shit? guess we gotta help him to maintain our brand though"
see 3h is clearly made and sold on a character drama basis but if you disregard that most of the characters are in fact politicians you end up completely misinterpreting many of the scenes
this is like half of history i think
good news: you have acquired new territory
bad news: you have acquired new subjects
dimitri and edelgard upon being forced to deal with each other's former vassals while leicesterians refuse to pay taxes
like no matter how progressive the lords are they're not gonna be able to fix a political culture that looks like this in 5 years while a war is going on,
bsky.app/profile/slot...
my personal opinion is that the likeliness of routes occuring is ss (nobody wins, everything collapses, byleth picks up the pieces)>>vw (leicester militarily wins but fódlan has to restructure radically to interact w/ wider world so not exactly unification under leicester rule) >>>>>>>>>>> cf, am
fódlani warfare
1. give epic speech about reunifying empire/taking back the kingdom/saving the alliance
2. raise the banner and rally thousands towards for the ultimate battle of ultimate destiny
3. lose to a fourth party who wasn't at the battle
fódlani warfare
1. give epic speech about reunifying empire/taking back the kingdom/saving the alliance
2. raise the banner and rally thousands towards for the ultimate battle of ultimate destiny
3. lose to a fourth party who wasn't at the battle