a) Saka has much better underlyings and contributes with end product.
b) I meant PL npg considering Sesko doesn't even play in Europe.
What does Gyokeres contribute if nothing shows up on even his underlying stats? Respectfully, "I was Team Sesko" has nothing to do with this conversation
Through an adaptation period, people still contribute a lot outside of the end product. Sesko has the same number of npg as Gyokeres even though he would have taken “years” to adapt
Using the cog analogy, he just looks like a rusty cog. The team doing very well is a testament to the 10 other players imo. Not saying we are carrying him but we are oretty close to that
I thought the big difference between him and Sesko was that he would hit the ground running right from the beginning
Also, look at the goals against Villa and some of the moves where Saka/Timber puts in the cross and it's almost always Odegaard delivering the pass at the right moment. Not an assist but definitely a pivotal pass
Yet the graph shows something else, maybe the eye test is aiding confirmation bias?
Every four years I think
I remember so many good European clubs being interested in him last year, damn
Love how this fraud tries to use semantics to frame every single contentious decision to ensure PGMOL looks good, but ends up making it much worse
GOLAÇO ATLE MADRID
Atl. Madrid 1-0 Betis
⚽ Julián Álvarez
🅰️ -
🏆 La Liga
Oh no
I am very curious who this guy is
Fair enough! Re: Cala, I initially thought he would be our answer to Gvardiol, but honestly, I agree that his wide defending leaves a lot to be desired which is why I am a bit hesitant to see how that translates to CB
Mostly in the camp for selling 🥝 but tbf a second choice LCB is never supposed to that guy for us. Do think that we can make more than what we paid for him tho
I do feel like even the smartest of accounts become snarky and outright rude when they have an opinion about arsenal
The Chelsea writers especially feel like they are basically mouthpieces for the owners lol
“Jesus is useless” that’s just not true. But he got injured in early January. We had the whole month.
What part of calling for attackers in every presser in January seems like “not prioritising strengthening the attack”?
Im ngl the recent Arsecast Extra pissed me off because Gunnerblog has brought this point up multiple times over the last two years while not wanting to talk about any context at all
Agree so hard with the first sentence. Even if we had Ollie Watkins, I think we score the 3 we needed. I don’t have an opinion on the second sentence
Uh oh, I can see the trolls coming. TBH Arteta could do much better for a question like that
Idek how that Tonali foul was not a penalty. This has been a generational shit performance.
The number of times they showed the replay, I was worried this was gonna be another VAR farce
I agree, I think Kai and the No 9 is going to be a devastating force against the mid-blocks
Honestly, that's where I am, too. Willing to put this season down to bad injury luck that has been the downfall of the team as a whole
Well, that's an overreaction
Red card and Leipzig are shocking. Sorry but Ekitike is definitely not it
And also in general Leipzig are shocking this season. So his stats should be looked at from that context
Dude, unfortunately, you can only judge production at age 25. Your idea of Neto was the wolves version which ran into open spaces and had a few highlights. Martinelli is better but nothing I say will ever change your mind. Cheers
