Interestingly, there is good evidence that Rome was actually founded by Romulus in the middle of the seventh century BCE, about 100 years after the traditional date of 753 BCE.
Posts by Caleb Howells
A close examination of the earliest evidence indicates that the traditional date of the Trojan War is several centuries too early: youtu.be/ZYH7VfphjxE?...
This video examines the issue of whether or not there really was a second Gildas in sixth century Britain:
youtu.be/nY9UDRQRHrs
When did King Arthur really live? This video examines what the evidence really shows and dispels common misconceptions that place him much too early in the stream of time: youtu.be/92VTAihHGKY?...
It’s commonly said that Roman Britain ended in 410, but is that really true? This video takes a look: youtu.be/ZrbmKvPK-WA?...
Was England already English before the Anglo-Saxons arrived? This video takes a look at this intriguing theory: youtu.be/IZI8hQ7BYcA?...
This video investigates the claim that King Arthur was not actually a king in the earliest records:
youtu.be/L0qziBwUm00
This video examines the issue of whether or not King Mark from the Arthurian legends really existed: youtu.be/TuFuDYiyO9w?...
This video examines the generally forgotten second Saint Patrick of the early medieval period: youtu.be/y3y0SMZULyc?...
This video examines the theory that Merlin can be identified with the historical Bishop Dubricius of medieval Wales: youtu.be/FA4mVjhkMGc?...
This video examines the claim that the Trojan War is mentioned in Bronze Age Hittite records: youtu.be/QEz7qUEqAlc?...
What he said about its location is actually incredibly consistent with Minoan Crete, along with various other details (some of them very specific) in his account of Atlantis.
This video examines the evidence for an Irish kingdom in medieval Britain that has generally been overlooked: youtu.be/2JTWdqN4vrs?...
This video examines the question of whether Homer or Hesiod was the first Greek poet:
youtu.be/21AMdIytROs?...
This article examines the theory that the real King Arthur was actually Arthwys ap Mar from the kingdom of Elmet: www.thecollector.com/was-king-art...
This video examines further evidence that the historical King Arthur was actually Athrwys ap Meurig by looking at how their family members match: youtu.be/GAFXZZnsDws?...
It does, yes. But the context of the discussion is: In the earliest version of the story of the Sword in the Stone, is it the same as Excalibur, or was it only later that they were combined into one sword?
Hence, an account that doesn’t mention the Sword in the Stone doesn’t come into it.
Indeed, but that doesn’t mention the Sword in the Stone at all.
This video looks into the supposed connection between Atlantis, the Eye of the Sahara, and King Atlas of Mauretania: youtu.be/b3F9jJ3XSgY?...
“And it was the same swerde
that he toke oute of the ston; and the letteres that were write on the swerde seide
that the right name was cleped Escaliboure.”
And yes, I can indeed show you the source itself. Here’s a link to the Prose Merlin, the earliest surviving version of the tale:
metseditions.org/read/lbP7YY4...
The relevant quote:
What do you mean? Wikipedia has the correct information.
It is only in the Post-Vulgate Cycle that the Sword in the Stone is made separate from Excalibur.
Already on it: youtu.be/r0jpba09m4I?...
I explain in that video, the earliest surviving version of the Sword in the Stone tale is the Prose Merlin, a version of Robert de Boron’s mostly lost Merlin poem (possibly also written by Robert himself). In that source, the sword is identified as Excalibur.
Your second fact, which is the pertinent one to this discussion, is incorrect. In the earliest version of the tale of the Sword in the Stone, it is identical to Excalibur. It is only later that they are separated into two different swords.
Yes, Excalibur the sword is mentioned (as Caliburn and Caledfwlch) before the story of the Sword in the Stone appears.
However, in the earliest version of the story of the Sword in the Stone, it is identified as Excalibur. It is not a separate sword.
It’s actually the other way around. The earliest version of the legend has Excalibur and the Sword in the Stone as the same sword, and then later versions split them into two different swords.
This video examines the legendary family members of King Arthur and shows how they can be identified as historical figures from a real dynasty in medieval Wales: youtu.be/NqKumMDaqgk?...
This video examines the true history of the ancient kings of Athens, which is profoundly different from what the traditional story claims: youtu.be/4ibu8uLDies?...
This video looks at yet more evidence that the real King Arthur can be identified as Athrwys ap Meurig of Gwent: youtu.be/USYC8D2mUKI?...