ml-gsai.github.io/LLaDA-demo/

Large Language Diffusion Models

Is er nog íémand bekommerd om de gevaren van AI? Op de AI-veiligheidconferentie was niemand bezig met de gevaren van AI. Alles was pr en machtsstrijd. Het doet Vincent Ginis denken aan de film Don’t look up.

Toen Don’t look up uitkwam bedacht ik hoe de metafoor tot vervelens toe misbruikt zou worden in opiniestukken. Ik keek neer op mijn toekomstige zelf.

Is er nog íémand bekommerd om de gevaren van AI? www.standaard.be/cnt/dmf20250...

If humanity goes down, let it at least be with poetry—not with 'OpenAI o5 (high),' but with a name the people chose. Something dignified. Something noble.

Like Chatty McChatface.

🤲

The people who are not particularly surprised by recent developments in AI are by and large saying AGI could be soon. The people confidently saying AGI won’t be soon are the same people who kept being very surprised by advancements over the past years.

Hoe gaan we om met technologie die ons intellectueel voorbijstreeft? Onderzoekers probeerden vragen te bedenken die AI niet kan beantwoorden. Viel dat even tegen. AI houdt ons een spiegel voor.

Academics worldwide worked to create questions no state-of-the-art AI could answer in Humanity's Last Exam.

But the real story isn’t just the questions that got in—it’s the ones that didn’t. Crafting problems that truly push AI is getting harder, and that says a lot about where we are.

When A.I. Passes This Test, Look Out The creators of a new test called “Humanity’s Last Exam” argue we may soon lose the ability to create tests hard enough for A.I. models.

It is 2025, and I vaguely remember the time when it was still possible to come up with questions that could baffle state-of-the-art LLMs.

Of course, I’m joking. I don’t really remember.