Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Mark Blades

Thanks Ben for the thorough writeup. I've led scrutineering at a few counts and while the initial counts by agency staff can have errors, these do get fixed and the AEC staff really do their best to enfranchise votes. Very sad to see votes go informal for mistakes or messy handwriting.. e.g. elderly

10 months ago 1 0 0 0

'Private' health insurance is a market receiving billions in public subsidies. Consumers deserve more transparency over pricing. I spoke to the ABC about these issues here: www.abc.net.au/news/2025-03...

1 year ago 1 0 0 0

Speaking to ABC News Radio shortly about our private health insurance investigation on pricing and policy phoenixing

1 year ago 0 0 0 0

Pretty strong candidate for last preference in my full BTL LegCo ballot..

1 year ago 0 0 0 0

If the Aust Govt does not denounce this immediately, we are complicit in approving ethnic cleansing of a historic level

1 year ago 1145 452 93 24

was great to have this today. great format. needed.

1 year ago 2 0 1 0
Post image

What a pair these headlines make

1 year ago 0 0 0 0

I need to know more about the tea. Sugar? What milk?? How strong???

1 year ago 0 0 0 0
Preview
Insurers hiding soaring increases to top-level health cover | CHOICE CHOICE research discovers some Australians are paying more than three times the headline premium increase for top-grade hospital insurance.

6. Insurers have continued this practice since our report. Yes, costs are up. Yes, risk rating is hard. But insurance companies should be transparent about their increases. Especially when your product is subsidised to $7 billion a year.

Our Feb report:
www.choice.com.au/money/insura...

1 year ago 0 0 0 0
Advertisement

5. As the Ombudsman notes, this impact restricts consumer choice as a consumer which may want to move funds will have to pay much higher prices. Consumers unhappy with their existing fund may feel compelled to stay 'loyal' as once they leave that old policy they can't come back.

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

4. Some of these increases were absurd: the Ombudsman found in one example a 21% price increase in the 'new' compared to the previous policy. These are not immediately reflected in the annual premium approval process on which the rebate % is determined. This is a giant loophole.

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

3. Insurers are restricted to increasing the prices of existing policies once a year in an approval process with the government, however this phoenix practice allows insurers to double-dip the price increases for new customers.

1 year ago 1 0 1 0

2. The phoenix practice is simple: insurers can close off an existing product and the next day introduce a 'new' product which is virtually identical with a new name and a much higher premium.

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

1. Earlier this year a CHOICE investigation found product phoenixing in health insurance was rampant. Today, the Ombudsman has released a report confirming this practice and how it undermines consumer choice.

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

I vibechecked my Roman Empire today: here's 5 things it taught me about Ohio B2B sales.

1 year ago 1 0 0 0